Isn't this how the DIMS get their inflated number of votes in the first place?
The only doubts about Ohio are not coming from people who actually live and vote in Ohio.
They're coming from people who aren't even involved in our election process and those people can kiss my butt.
Yup. We all know that Bush was elected by the President of Diebold. I have it on good authority that Diebold put all those Bush bumper stickers you've seen on those vehicles without the owners' permission, too.
And that's the keyword here . . . only left-wing activists and looney-tunes politicians on the fringe (Conyers, Kaptur, etc) are trying to make hay with this. The rest want no part of it.
Somebody was on FNC the other night talking about how flyers were distributed in black neighborhoods saying the Democrat election would be on Nov 3. Of course, he couldn't produce a single flyer, and I'm not sure there's anything illegal about it anyway.
Only in the minds of the whining losers!
As The Eagles would say, "Get over it, get over it..."
This election had no more problems than any other and considering the record turnout that's saying something. AP puts a story out like this every day, same ole crap with a bit of wording change. I'm sick of it. There were some minor gliches, long lines were do to a record turnout, that's it, enough already. They pulled this same crap in Florida 2000, and out of the 100s of supposed instances of voter disenfranchisememt, only 3 people wound up testifying and those three were debunked. Demagouges are just bullsh!^ artist slaesman looking for a customer and I aint buyin
I for one doubt the results. I think that there was an active attempt to steal this election, and for the most part the evil doers succeeded, they stole PA, and WI for sure, and I have little doubt that they also stole Minnesota. Thankfully, their attempts in Ohio failed and we still won.
Clear, irrefutable evidence of institutional racism and deliberate disenfanchisement of minorities.
As we all know, in suburban polling areas there was valet service, latte, no waiting in line and free hors d'oeuvres.
Talk about blaming the victim...the Dims have the unmitigated gall to question the 2004 results?
How about questioning the results evey single election since the rise of Andy Jackson? It's the Dims who have corrupted fully the electoral process in this country.
What a shameless bunch!
Yeah, I doubt Kerry got as many votes as reported. No way, no how.
This happened to me, but just the opposite. I touched Bush on the screen and the final tally showed I voted for Kerry.
So I followed the instructions to cancel out that vote, and went back and changed my vote to Bush.
What exactly is the problem, if they noticed the machine got it wrong and changed it, their vote was not cast for Bush.
And with touch screens, they give you lots of notice of an undervote and you can't overvote on them.
This, to me, is a non-issue, unless you're saying that people are dumb enough to look at the final vote tally shown on a screen and not believe they can change it to whom they want to vote for.
The only people still clinging to this delusion are Left-wing fanatics.
Is it true that the Electorl College votes are cast Monday? If so that ends all the lawsuits and recounts.
Who controls the county governments in the areas of Ohio where voters were allegedly disenfranchised by long lines and other tactics that Jackson claims were designed to keep minorities from voting? Republicans or Democrats?
The socialists, e.g., the democrat party is just trying to destroy confidence in the election system over a protracted period of time. They know that during the next election cycle, they can continue to cast doubt and eventually they can flat out steal the one thing that makes a democracy, the individual vote!
The slow, painful death of journalism in the country began when jouralists decided it was acceptable to use statements like "some say" or "many critics disagree" to introduce an opposing point of view.
These statements are never sourced and mislead by suggesting that there is a legitimate, rational basis for the point. Journalists should always label their sources for such statements. If "some say", give us the names of the "some". If "many critics disagree", give us the names of the critics. Let us be the judge of the value of the point based on who put it forth.
Of course, the sad truth is that the source of the criticism is almost always the network themselves.