Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Some, the Race Remains Far From Over (many Ohio RATS won't let it go)
Yahoo News ^ | 12/12/04 | Sam Howe Verhovek

Posted on 12/12/2004 6:00:15 AM PST by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Perdogg
"However, even if Bush doesn't receive the 20 EV, Bush would still win 266-256."

Sorry to point this out, but unless you have some sort of subtle reasoning that isn't obvious to me, your calculations aren't correct.

The EV is 286-252. If the President had lost Ohio and all of the other states remained unchanged, W would have 266 and sKerry would have 272.

The 20 Ohio votes would not simply disappear.

41 posted on 12/12/2004 8:27:49 AM PST by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator; Liz; Howlin
The Bush campaign was aware that they were fake three weeks before the election.

What I found strange, other than Effin' Kerry winning Iowa after being in third place a day before, was how Big Media picked Ohio to be SO close and important for Effin' Kerry about six months out from the election. New Jersey was supposed to be in play for Dubya. Hawaii popped up at the last minute. But no state had so much attention paid to it like Ohio did. Even Floriduh wasn't paid attention to as much because it was supposed to have had it's problems fixed from the 2000 debacle.

I thought something was fishy from the beginning...

42 posted on 12/12/2004 8:32:23 AM PST by Libloather (Big Media news anchors are as worthless as male nipples...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Columbus Dawg
It seems the "establishment" is trying to stick us with Betty Montgomery.

If the Republican Nominee is Betty Montgomery then I for one will vote for whomever the Democrats nominate.

I would rather have a real Democrat Governor for Ohio rather than a fake Democrat like Betty Montgomery.

If you hate conservatives then you love Betty Montgomery and Vice Versa

Ken Blackwell is My Man.. He is indeed a GREAT AMERICAN!!!


43 posted on 12/12/2004 8:52:34 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JoeV1
No, you misunderstand the process. Once the certified electors votes are sent to Washington, D.C. there is NO stopping the process by outside legal action. There is NO court which may interfere at that point. It is up to the Joint Session of Congress to ascertain the legitimacy of the electors' votes when they are counted.

No other body has any say in the matter, so 'litigation' will stop nothing. Many lawyers seem to forget that the Founding Fathers already thought this one through...


dvwjr
44 posted on 12/12/2004 9:30:16 AM PST by dvwjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
"We cannot live with fraud and stealing."

The pimpster didn't finish.

"We cannot live with fraud and stealing that doesn't go our way"

45 posted on 12/12/2004 9:34:51 AM PST by evad (DUmmie FUnnies and Pookie Toons-the start of a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dvwjr
Thanks for clearing that up.

So this recount effort is all for nothing? Do I understand you correctly that even if the recount finds enough votes to give Kerry the victory it must go to the Congress for a vote before he would actually be declared the winner?
46 posted on 12/12/2004 9:57:31 AM PST by JoeV1 (The Democrats-The unlawful and corrupt leading the uneducated and blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Betty Montgomery has been attorney general of the state. She has been fairly quiet as far as statewide visibility. I don't know whether she is even very conservative or not. If she is a candidate it will be because the party insiders decided it is her turn. Sort of a Bob Dole thing.

Blackwell has of course had a lot of statewide publicity, and in a primary I would think he would be the favorite.


47 posted on 12/12/2004 10:02:03 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If anyone would like to dend the good Mr Arnebeck an email, his addy is arnebeck@aol.com


48 posted on 12/12/2004 10:16:52 AM PST by stm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeV1
You are correct. The recount is for nothing, except to satisfy those minor third-party and 'bitterenders' who want the counting to go on and on and on...

The Ohio Legislature, as do all of the other States in the Union uses the popular vote of the People of the State to allocate its 20 Electoral College votes. The Ohio Legislature determined that it would assign ALL of its alloted Federal Electoral College votes to the winner of the Federal general election held in November of this year. The popular vote totals were certified by the Ohio Secretary of State, Mr. Blackwell and the Bush slate of 20 Ohio Electoral votes for President Bush was chosen and will be voted tommorrow in Columbus, Ohio on Monday December 13th. The Governor of the State of Ohio will authenticate both the Certificates of Ascertainment and Certificates of Votes with his signature and the State Seal. These documents and their certified copies will then be transmitted to the multiple appropriate authorities in Washington, D.C as required by Fedral statute.

Given the problems with the presidential election of 1876 between the winner Hayes(R) and Tilden(D) Federal Statues were enacted which ensured that there would be no contesting of a States electoral votes transmitted to the Federal Capitol if said electors were determined six days prior to their meeting in their State capitol to vote in the Electoral College. This is the so-called 'safe-harbor' provision adopted by the 45th Congress still holds sway today. All Congresses since the 45th are still bound to honor this law, so the Bush slate of electors votes transmitted must be accepted by the 109th Congress in January 2005.

Now if the recount would somehow change the popular vote result, or the Ohio Supreme Court would somehow order that ANOTHER slate of Kerry electors would be sent to the Federal capitol then the 109th Congress would deal with the possible two slates of Ohio electors. The bottom line - the Bush slate would be counted and Bush is determined to have a majority of the elctoral votes and is elected President of the United States.

Here is a source with all the technical details:

Source: 4President.org

Hope this helps,

dvwjr

49 posted on 12/12/2004 10:53:04 AM PST by dvwjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"I can't for the life of me understand why Kerry isn't fighting harder for this."

Because he's not a barking LW moonbat like you

50 posted on 12/12/2004 11:31:04 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Positive

No they would not disappear. Bush has already won them per the safe harbour provision. Kerry cannot win them.


51 posted on 12/12/2004 11:32:32 AM PST by Perdogg (W stands for Winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Dear Ohio Democrats:


52 posted on 12/12/2004 11:33:55 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (“I know a greag deal about the Middle East because I’ve been raising Arabian horses" Patrick Swazey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Positive

Bush has won. The only way the electors would change is both the House and the Senate vote to take the votes away from Bush. If only one the houses were to give the votes to Kerry and the other Bush, the decision would go back to the Governor of Ohio, Taft, a Republican.


53 posted on 12/12/2004 11:38:12 AM PST by Perdogg (W stands for Winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Clifford Arnebeck won't let it go. He can't let it go. Not, he says, while America refuses to recognize that John F. Kerry was elected president Nov. 2.

Have you, Mr. Aenebeck, no conviction for the decision making abilities of your man, the flip flopper Jf'nK?

After all he did concede the election!

Was it a poor decision?

54 posted on 12/12/2004 12:10:18 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvwjr
Thanks for the explanation.

You said "Now if the recount would somehow change the popular vote result, or the Ohio Supreme Court would somehow order that ANOTHER slate of Kerry electors would be sent to the Federal capitol then the 109th Congress would deal with the possible two slates of Ohio electors. The bottom line - the Bush slate would be counted and Bush is determined to have a majority of the electoral votes and is elected President of the United States.<\b>

So even if a recount determined that Kerry won, you say the Congress would still accept the original elctoral vote from Ohio?

55 posted on 12/14/2004 12:53:26 PM PST by JoeV1 (The Democrats-The unlawful and corrupt leading the uneducated and blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JoeV1
Correct. When there is a disputed set of electoral votes (or multiple sets) the Congress goes through their routine. If one Representative and one Senator agree that a particular State's electoral college votes are 'not regularly given' or in dispute, the two Houses immediately go to their respective chambers and vote on which set of electoral votes to accept. If both Houses agree to the same set of electoral votes, then those votes are accepted. If there is disagreement between the Houses of Congress on the status of a multiple set of electors from a State, then the set of electoral votes endorsed by the Governor of the State are those selected.

A State or Federal Court cannot require the Legislature of a State to send another slate of electors, they may be able to force a Secretary of State to supply the forms for another slate of electoral college votes, but if that slate did not vote on December 13th then its legitimacy may be suspect. There is NO way that a Governor may be FORCED to affix his signature upon any Court ordered slate of electors votes, so in the case of Ohio in 2004, the Bush slate will win no matter what happens in the Courts or Congress.

Hope this helps,

dvwjr
56 posted on 12/14/2004 4:08:22 PM PST by dvwjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Because every Ohio Democratic official and party hack knows that Democrats typically steal about 50,000 votes in every Ohio election.

The irony of the 2004 election is that the Democrats (DNC) complained so much so loudly of supposed "Republican fraud" prior to Nov. 2 that it forced the RNC and the GOP watchdogs to launch a massive watchdog effort, which thereby prevented the Democrats from swindling their usual 2 or 3 percent of ADDITIONAL phantom votes from inner cities and union strongholds.

Even with our diligence, there supposedly were some VOTER REGISTRATION PADDING attempts by rabid Dems in liberal cities like Philadelphia, but with the eyes of the nation focusing like a laser on each precinct, McCauliff and the unions could not stack the deck as easily as they've done in the past.

After all, isn't it amazing how votes did not magically appear from after hours polls in St. Louis, or at Indian reservations in Arizona, New Mexico and North Dakota?

Even in states where Kerry won, the margin of victory was much less than in 2004, and I strongly believe it was due to the diligence that Karl Rove and the RNC's small army of lawyers.

For me, the sweet irony of 2004 is that Dems seem to have cut off their own fraudulent foot, I believe, by stirring up claims BEFORE the election about supposed intimidation and ballot irregularities.

57 posted on 12/14/2004 4:36:18 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson