EUROPE -- THY NAME IS COWARDICE

Matthias Döpfner, Chief Executive of German publisher Axel Springer AG, has written a blistering attack in the daily WELT against the cowardice of Europe in the face of the Islamic threat.

A few days ago Henryk M. Broder wrote in Welt am Sonntag, "Europe -- your family name is appeasement." It's a phrase you can't get out of your head because it's so terribly true.

Appeasement cost millions of Jews and non-Jews their lives as England and France, allies at the time, negotiated and hesitated too long before they noticed that Hitler had to be fought, not bound to agreements. Appeasement stabilized communism in the Soviet Union and East Germany in that part of Europe where inhuman, suppressive governments were glorified as the ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities. Appeasement crippled Europe when genocide ran rampant in Kosovo and we Europeans debated and debated until the Americans came in and did our work for us. Rather than protecting democracy in the Middle East, European appeasement, camouflaged behind the fuzzy word "equidistance," now countenances suicide bombings in Israel by fundamentalist Palestinians. Appeasement generates a mentality that allows Europe to ignore 300,000 victims of Saddam's torture and machinery and, motivated by the self-righteousness of the peace-movement, to issue bad grades to George Bush. A particularly grotesque form of appeasement is reacting to the escalating violence by Islamic fundamentalists in Holland and elsewhere by suggesting that we should really have a Muslim holiday in Germany.

What else has to happen before the European public and its political leadership get it? There is a sort of crusade underway, an especially perfidious crusade consisting of systematic attacks by fanatic Muslims, focused on civilians and directed against our free, open Western societies. It is a conflict that will most likely last longer than the great military conflicts of the last century -- a conflict conducted by an enemy that cannot be tamed by tolerance and accommodation but only spurred on by such gestures, which will be mistaken for signs of weakness.

Two recent American presidents had the courage needed for anti-appeasement: Reagan and Bush. Reagan ended the Cold War and Bush, supported only by the social democrat Blair acting on moral conviction, recognized the danger in the Islamic fight against democracy. His place in history will have to be evaluated after a number of years have passed.

In the meantime, Europe sits back with charismatic self-confidence in the multicultural corner instead of defending liberal society's values and being an attractive center of power on the same playing field as the true great powers, America and China. On the contrary-we Europeans present ourselves, in contrast to the intolerant, as world champions in tolerance, which even (Germany's Interior Minister) Otto Schily justifiably criticizes. Why? Because we're so moral? I fear it's more because we're so materialistic.

For his policies, Bush risks the fall of the dollar, huge amounts of additional national debt and a massive and persistent burden on the American economy-because everything is at stake.

While the alleged capitalistic robber barons in American know their priorities, we timidly defend our social welfare systems. Stay out of it! It could get expensive. We'd rather discuss the 35-hour workweek or our dental health plan coverage. Or listen to TV pastors preach about "reaching out to murderers." These days, Europe reminds me of an elderly aunt who hides her last pieces of jewelry with shaking hands when she notices a robber has broken into a neighbor's house. Europe, thy name is cowardice.

"All that is necessary for the forces of evil to win in the world is for enough good men to do nothing." -- Edmund Burke

"All that is necessary for the forces of evil to win in the world is for enough good men to do nothing." -- Edmund Burke

Burke was wrong. His quote implies that it is possible to BE a good man, AND YET do nothing. Much as I applaud his intended sentiment- those people who think that they are good men...who just somehow, accidentally, did nothing, "aren't worth the powder to blow them up" as my grandma used to say.

This article is all too true.

I really do think that Europe devoured itself in two world wars and only the garbage DNA is left. Garbage just sits there and stinks.

Liberalism never goes to war to defend itself because it has no principles to defend - it only has undeseerved self righteousness. It's great at the name game, but never gets beyond that. It has ideology, but no ideals. Ideology without ideals is an empty bag of wind.

However, that empty bag of wind is perfectly capable of keeping others from defending themselves. The idealists end up punching an empty bag of wind (the leftwing) and being deflected from confronting the true enemy - Islam.

The article is also right about George Bush. Though much of what he does is quite incomprehensible to me - like his horrendous border amnesty plan.....he does have a view of the larger threat. He saw it from the beginning when he used the word "Crusade." Though he quickly changed vocabulary in order not to be drowned out by the PC crowd, it was an insight into his thinking.

Harry Reid the other day when he proclaimed that the president did not have permission to attack Iran - gave traitorous comfort to our enemy. I'm sure Iran was pleased.

So the bottom line is:

Islam wants to kill us.

The democrats/professives/leftwing....are giving them the knife.

It's true in Europe - it's true here.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.