Christianity now "hate crime": the bible is "hate speech" subject to seizure

I am neither. But thanks for the attempt to psycho-analyze me.

don't presume to tell me what to do, my obtuse friend. I didn't psychoanalye you but DID point out that which you appear to be from this side of the ether. Referring to "my community" is very common among homos when they are trying to pretend to be something other than a 1.5% neurotic minority. I have seen it from them before, many times & many places. They make the same assumption you just did and profess to speak for a "community" that isn't. They have their own prejudices, heirarchy and social enclaves within their non-communal "community". And, BTW, on what authority do you speak for YOUR community? Isn't that a bit presumptuous? Next, presuming that you're NOT a homo, why the heavy defense of the homo manifesto, trying to dissociate it from homos at large and lay it off one guy? That isn't Michaels Swift's agenda. It has been widely adopted. You should be able to surmise that by simply typing same into a search engine and looking how many times it comes up and where. If you can't see that then you're the one lacking cognitive skills. Whether or not you agree with me is irrelevant. Your faux pas was two-fold: Trying to dissociate the homo agenda from the homofascists and utilizing ad hominems in lieu of substance. You came out swinging in defense of the indefensible & apparently didn't think you'd get called on it as you seem to have some illusion of being an "alpha" in here. That, my friend, is (to borrow from you) "effin brilliant". You need to learn to NOT underestimate your intended adversaries. I addressed the issues, you are STILL dodging them, choosing the leftist's tactics or personal attacks, bluster & feigned indignation in lieu of giving straight answers. So I will ask again: what is the difference between "homo manifesto" and "gay Manifesto", especially when said "manifesto" is being adopted, disseminated, promulgated, legislated & acted upon by the homofascists? How can you factually establish ANY degree of separation? Show me the links to homo websites which decry his ideas and show me the homosexual activists who are NOT trying to foist this garbage off on the normal people out here. If you're correct in your assumptions that should be relatively easy, no?

let me see...since I don't agree with your position, that makes me gay or one who loves them.

Ok then (to quote Ricky Ricardo) "Lucy, you'd better splain" why you jumped in on the LOSER'S side. "'splain" why you tried to downplay the magnitude of the dogma from that & thousands of other similar websites, all of which dogma is currently playing out in America. You have skittered right on by the questions I asked you about that. This is so "left"! When asked a question on which they know they cannot rationally defend their position they feign indignation &/or change the subject.

You really are a piece of work. When someone dares point out your poor reading comprehension skills,

Thank you for acknowledging my craftmanship! On your second topic, Dr. Dictionary, exactly WHAT did I misread?(the silence is going to be deafening) I believe this is the SECOND time you've waltzed right by that question. Too tough for ya? Twice you've tried this gambit without being able to support you opinion. And AGAIN you give me ad hominem (case on point) in lieu of substantiated, cogent argument, yet you feel you have some basis to be offended for my having given you same as payment-in-kind. At least you're consistent in your tactics. Or an I "psychoanalyzing" you again?

you automatically go on the attack and label me a homosexual.

Well there's a factual misstatement. I did give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you may be a homophile:ho·mo·phile adjective 1. advocating homosexual and lesbian rights: supporting the rights of homosexual men and lesbians and appreciating their culture (encarta encyclopedia)

Is that better? Based on your posts on this matter you'd have a hard time detaching yourself from that definition.

Typical ad hominem tactics of a weak minded fool.

ummmm, sweetness; "weak-minded" should be hyphenated & is redundant with "fool". How ironic that you'd stumble on something like that. ;º) That having been said, YOU'RE the one who started with the ad hominems & are still so doing. You STILL haven't addressed the issues. The question was (since it seems to escape you) "aren't the ideas layed out in the homo manifesto playing out RIGHT NOW in America?" Obviously a straight answer is not forthcoming.

You don't even know me. You might want to check with some Freepers who do know me before making such insinuations.

I don't need to know you. I just saw you work product. Matthew 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. You are defending radical homofascism by trying to propound that the "gay manifesto" is NOT the "homo manifesto" & a part of the mainstream homo movement. Homofascism is a cancer eating at our nation & society yet you're pretending that the points in the homo manifesto are not being driven into the body of normal society like rusted nails into the hands of Christ. What more do I need to know about you on this topic and why would I even CARE to?

But you'll have to hang around here a lot longer than 2 months for that, newbie.

Oh WOW! I am cut to the bone by that one! Wowsers!! If you implication that time in a forum mgaically begets wisdom, I'd have to presume your time in grade here to be "today". I'll point out a couple of presumptions under which you're apparently laboring, if I may. Your first is that you're assuming that I was not here before I signed up as a member. You have no clue how long I have been reading Free Republic before joining. Second, you don't need to know a person's history if he's a relative stranger who standing there intentionally insulting and/or threatening you. You may safely presume he's an "alpha hotel" with little chance of error

You can reply if you like but I won't even read it if you do. You aren't worth it.

Yeah you will. Your personality is such that you can't STAND NOT having the last word, even if it is just another as hominem attack. Because I have pointed that out, you may pretend you didn't read this by not writing back, however. That's fine with me as if you DO write back I know that you still won't be addressing the issues. I have seen "you" a thousand times before in other places & times. You will read this & you will battle the compulsion to write back with more insults & threats & more bluster, based on your perceived stature in here but if you do so you know that you'll be revealing a weakness of character. Tough choice, huh? Write if you find it therapeutic. I am sure somebody will read it. It just won't be I because I also know your style. I haven't lived 50+ plus years on this earth without being able to recognize certain character traits. Accordingly, I will shake the dust of you from my feet and move on. I know that only a homphile or another with a light grip on the handlebars of reality could swerve into some of the places you've just gone in propounding your support of those who would defile our great nation, turning into a modern-day sodom.

But I will tell you this. If you ever address me in such a manner here on this forum again, I will take steps with the Admin Moderators sufficient to have you suspended or banned. If you are not clear on the rules of this forum, I'm sure they will be glad to educate you.

OOOOO~~Puleeezzzeee!! You start a fight then run & hide behind the moderator's skirt when you get slapped down. Let me disabuse you of this notion that you are somehow a "victim" here. This is where things went sideways. You started with:

Did you read the entire site or are you deliberately misrepresenting what is at that link?

then when I asnwered and asked you to provide a factual basis for your insulting question, you followed that gem with:

Wipe the spittle from your chin and take it down a notch. You rave sir.

Lest you not recall, you chose to go to a frontal assault in lieu of dialog. "Pickett's Charge" was more effective than your attack & that was a slaughter. You failed to properly assess your liabilities & reaped the reward of precipitousness. You apparently presumed that since I was "new" here that I was "new" and inexperienced in general and you got your feet kicked out from under you as a lesson of the price of underestimating your opponent. IF you can't handle the "down & dirty", don't START the "down & dirty". You had an initial opportunity to address the issues, point by point, & you replied with ad hominems, MORE ad hominems, bluster & have now ratcheted it up to threats. Still you've not provided a scintilla of substance to support your position though. No surprises here. Your character was clearly displayed in your fisrt post to me...

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.