In what way am I "misrepresenting"? IS that NOT the link to Michael Swift's homo manifesto?
Are not the ideas expressed therein consistent with what we're seeing here?All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked.(DONE!) Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.....(DONE!) ....If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.....(DONE, NOT LITERALLY BUT FIGURATIVELY AS IN THIS CASE) Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles (DONE: DOES THE NAME "QUEER EYE FOR THE STRAIGHT GUY" RING A BELL?AND THE FEMALE VERSION OF SAME)....We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing(IN PROCESS. READ:"HOMOPHOBIC", "BREEDER", "FEAR OF"{THEM}"STUPIDLY HETEROSEXUAL{below), "QUEER EYE" ETC......Those who oppose us will be exiled.(DONE: OR JAILED, AS THE CASE MAY BE, FOR "HATE CRIMES")) ....All churches who condemn us will be closed.(NOW ONGOING. CASE ON POINT. GOD'S WORD IS NOW "HATE SPEECH". HOW LONG WILL CHURCHES LAST IF SPEAKING GOD'S WORD IS A FELONY? AND WHATEVER HAPPENED TO PUBLIC PRAYER, THE 10 COMMANDMENTS IN PUBLIC, CHRISTMAS...) Our only gods are handsome young men....All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.(COMING SOON!! TO THE CITY OF "BROTHERLY LOVE")
IS there any part of that which I have misrepresented?
Is there any part of that which HAS NOT become part of our daily lives? Michael Swift and the homos try and dismiss this as a "satire" because if the heteros knew for a moment that this IS THE manifesto and it is playing out just and he predicted, there'd be hell to pay.
...test..
Yes, it is. But you did not call it "Michael Swift's homo manifesto". You called it "the homo manifesto". Do you think that the rantings of Michael Swift represent the views of ALL homosexuals?
If so, do you also think that your rantings represent the views of all on Free Republic?
Take a step back and look at your reply #144. Wipe the spittle from your chin and take it down a notch. You rave sir.
Is there any part of that which HAS NOT become part of our daily lives?
Speaking only for myself and my community...yes. None of it.