Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ForGod'sSake
Actually, I didn't forget.

Our essay writer should do his own research, doncha think?

REYNOLDS v. U.S., 98 U.S. 145 (1878)

You forgot to link your source.

74 posted on 12/16/2004 9:19:21 AM PST by Ready4Freddy (Carpe Sharpei !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Ready4Freddy
Our essay writer should do his own research, doncha think?

Indeed. Accepted facts are not always facts? One has to wonder why the Hugo Black reference is widely accepted as the "first" decision to cite the "separation" language. Thoughts?

REYNOLDS v. U.S., 98 U.S. 145 (1878)

Noted. Thanks for the point(s).

FGS

75 posted on 12/16/2004 9:51:05 AM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Ready4Freddy; ForGod'sSake
Our essay writer should do his own research, doncha think?

When you are done with your straw man arguments (or red herrings, or literacy problems, whatever) you can do a little research (and reading comprehension practice) of your own.

Nobody here (certainly not me) ever said that Hugo Black was the first to use the words "separation of church and state". My point was that the athiests of the ACLU and their Democrat allies have, over the past 25 years, leaned on Black's 1962 use of the phrase. (ENGEL v. VITALE)

Check it out if you wish.
And please read more carefully before you imply that I don't do research.

Anyway, I do appreciate your interest in this topic and I have learned interesting things from your posts. Thanks for reading the essay and for your replies.

Regards,
LH

89 posted on 12/16/2004 4:58:42 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson