Skip to comments.
Report: Schwarzenegger urges GOP left turn
CNN ^
Posted on 12/18/2004 7:32:17 PM PST by jakerobins
Report: Schwarzenegger urges GOP left turn Saturday, December 18, 2004 Posted: 7:34 PM EST (0034 GMT)
Arnold Schwarzenegger
BERLIN, Germany (AP) -- California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger suggested in a German newspaper interview published Saturday that the Republican Party should move "a little to the left," a shift that he said would allow it to pick up new voters.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: ahhnold; arnold; arnoldsarino; calgov; governator; kennedy; leftistrino; leftward; liberal; rino; rinos; schwartzenrino; schwarzenegger; toldyouso; traitors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-85 next last
To: jakerobins
HAHAHAHA
oh.. he was serious?
2
posted on
12/18/2004 7:33:00 PM PST
by
LauraleeBraswell
(Support our troops.........)
To: jakerobins
Seems we did just fine in November without "moving left"
3
posted on
12/18/2004 7:33:55 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: jakerobins
Yeah, sure. Let's have an amendment to allow foreign born to become President. Then we would be like Europe, BARF.
To: jakerobins
He's always been a liberal. Why should anyone be surprised?
When he announced he was running and he said "The children get first grabs on the Treasury" that was it for me as far as I'm concerned.
5
posted on
12/18/2004 7:35:19 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: RWR8189
the suggestion was made by Maria Schwarzenegger
6
posted on
12/18/2004 7:35:31 PM PST
by
kingattax
To: jakerobins
Arnold is dead wrong on this. The last several elections have shown that the U.S. mainstream parade is turning right. If he doesn't like it, he can go lead the gay pride parade in San Francisco.
7
posted on
12/18/2004 7:36:39 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: jakerobins
(R)nold forgot the lesson of the 2004 election and 2003 recall: It's OK to be conservative!
8
posted on
12/18/2004 7:37:51 PM PST
by
AVNevis
(You're never to young to stand up for America.)
To: jakerobins; farmfriend; NormsRevenge; SierraWasp; Grampa Dave; calcowgirl
9
posted on
12/18/2004 7:38:23 PM PST
by
tubebender
(If I had know I would live this long I would have taken better care of myself...)
To: jakerobins
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger suggested in a German newspaper interview published Saturday that the Republican Party should move "a little to the left," a shift that he said would allow it to pick up new voters. Would the jackwits who want to alter the Constitution to accommodate this RINO please step forward now?
10
posted on
12/18/2004 7:41:41 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: RWR8189
"Seems we did just fine in November without "moving left":
Actually, GW was more than accomodating in his four years to the Left. Did not help GOP or GW at all.
They want - WHAT they want - and little 'turns the left' only rewards their patience. . .
11
posted on
12/18/2004 7:42:28 PM PST
by
cricket
(I)
To: -=Wing_0_Walker=-
"Yeah, sure. Let's have an amendment to allow foreign born to become President. Then we would be like Europe, BARF"
Forgotabouthat. . .that is precisely why he trying to loosen up the GOP.
12
posted on
12/18/2004 7:44:27 PM PST
by
cricket
(I)
To: jakerobins
A German publication? Somehow I think something may have been "lost in translation."
13
posted on
12/18/2004 7:46:07 PM PST
by
Hildy
( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
I've been hearing this nonsense for decades. GOP can gain votes by changing its positions. What sense does that make?? Sell our souls to win elections, and have no core convictions? Win just for the sake of winning. I would rather see the party go down to defeat on principle.
14
posted on
12/18/2004 7:48:23 PM PST
by
TNCMAXQ
To: KoRn
"When he announced he was running and he said "The children get first grabs on the Treasury" that was it for me as far as I'm concerned."
I heard that also. Former (Los Angeles) Mayor Dick Riorden, a Republican, said basically that he was going to re-shape the Republican Party once he became governor.
Unfortunately for him, he said it before the Primary, and saw his large lead vanish, before getting trounced.
Maybe Arnold's role models is the Illinois Republican Party, where the Chairman rides on the lead float, during Chicago's Gay Pride Parade.
Like Mr. Riorden, Arnold is about to get his head handed to him by mainstream Republicans. Celebrity-appeal will only get him so far - and not far enough.
15
posted on
12/18/2004 7:50:05 PM PST
by
BobL
To: TNCMAXQ
And not that I would want to put much stock in a poll, but didn't I see one just the other day that showed the GOP with one of its largest advantages ever in party identification? Seems we must be doing something right.
16
posted on
12/18/2004 7:52:17 PM PST
by
mull
To: jakerobins
Sorry Arnie, I don't want those voters. God, he's definitly proving a RINO, but that's Kaliphornication, what to expect?
17
posted on
12/18/2004 7:53:50 PM PST
by
jb6
(Truth = Christ)
To: jakerobins
The only reason Arnold got elected in the first place is that the Republican voters in California were deprived of the opportunity to vote in a primary election because of the machinations of Karl Rove and Gerald Parsky.
Frankly, if Arnold doesn't start doing a better job than he's done so far, it's not clear that he will be re-elected as governor next time around. A lot of people held their noses on the right-to-life issue in hopes that at least he would fix the budget. He has done neither. The stem cell research initiative is an abomination, and he has done nothing to cut spending.
18
posted on
12/18/2004 7:53:59 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: TNCMAXQ
Let the losers come to US on the Right.
This stuff is why I voted for Tom McClintock instead of Arnie. In ADDITION to Arnie's fiscal liberalism.......Baaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh!
19
posted on
12/18/2004 7:54:00 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(REMEMBER THE ALGOREAMO--relentlessly hammer on the TRUTH, like the Dems demand recounts)
To: jakerobins
Thanks for the advice, Arnold.
We move any further to the left, and Hillary's going to be running to our right.
By the way, did Maria give you this gem of wisdom?
20
posted on
12/18/2004 7:56:36 PM PST
by
nj26
To: TNCMAXQ
21
posted on
12/18/2004 8:01:02 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: BobL
The perfect DIM candidate would be a pro life, pro gun rights, and not in your face pro gay candidate. They could do that and be the typical tax and spend liberal and win big. The shame for them is they could NEVER survive a DIM primary campaign.
22
posted on
12/18/2004 8:01:53 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: tubebender
"I would like people to remember me as someone who raised standards, wherever I got involved." he was quoted as saying. Raised standards? What a crock.
To: LauraleeBraswell
24
posted on
12/18/2004 8:03:46 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: calcowgirl
25
posted on
12/18/2004 8:04:58 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: KoRn
"The shame for them is they could NEVER survive a DIM primary campaign."
That kind of candidate may be able to survive a primary in the south - and that kinda scares me. Lucky for us they haven't figured that out yet.
26
posted on
12/18/2004 8:04:58 PM PST
by
BobL
To: BobL
Just shows how extreme they are on social issues, and how they are in big trouble.
27
posted on
12/18/2004 8:06:56 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: nj26
"We move any further to the left, and Hillary's going to be running to our right."
Actually, that is exactly what's she's doing. She's already on the right on terrorism. Now she's getting to Bush's right on immigration (not very hard to do). And notice how she keeps a very, very, low profile on most explosive issues. She's laying low and building up a record, prior to striking.
We really do have to be careful about getting outflanked on the right. After all, that's how Bush-41 got defeated.
28
posted on
12/18/2004 8:11:26 PM PST
by
BobL
To: BobL
Agreed. We need to move to the right, and take a stand on principle. We lose our principles and compromise our values by moving left, and Hillary can run to our ideological right, and we will also be a point of moral equivalency.
29
posted on
12/18/2004 8:13:12 PM PST
by
nj26
To: Prime Choice
Your work highlights what irks me. First they join the republican party, then do everything they can to undermine the platform and turn it into a party that supports dem ideals. If they want to move left, change parties!
To: nj26
Yea, it's insidious, but it did happen to Bush-41.
Consider:
Bush-41 raised taxes.
Bush-41 gave us the Americans with Disabilities Act
Bush-41 renewed, with punishing requirements, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act
Bush-41 gave us the quota bill
Clinton promised a Middle Class Tax Cut.
Clinton promised to end welfare as we know it.
And, if you can believe it, Bush-41 was portrayed as a tool of the extreme Right Wing.
Regardless of the results of Clinton, that's where things stood on election night, 1992. We had been out-flanked by Clinton and the Dems on both the left and the right.
Not an easy thing to do, but Bush-41 let it happen.
31
posted on
12/18/2004 8:19:46 PM PST
by
BobL
To: jakerobins
It took a little while for him to show his true colors but it was inevitable.
32
posted on
12/18/2004 8:25:49 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: jakerobins
AREnold is full of sh*t. Another RINO smell...
33
posted on
12/18/2004 8:27:43 PM PST
by
MN_Mike
(In Pelosi, Kerry and the Blow Fish (Kennedy) We Mis-Trust)
To: calcowgirl
If they want to move left, change parties! AMEN! If they're so hip on supporting Leftist planks, let 'em go to the damned Democrat party!
34
posted on
12/18/2004 8:28:01 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: MN_Mike
Thank an Ahhnold-supporting RINO for this mess. Heck, send 'em a
special Christmas card. Here's a suggested one...
35
posted on
12/18/2004 8:30:09 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: Prime Choice
I have no objection to changing that requirement of native birth.
It's not as if Ahnold is going to be elected anyways.
36
posted on
12/18/2004 8:31:54 PM PST
by
Clypp
To: Clypp
I have no objection to changing that requirement of native birth. One question: no other nation on Earth allows foreign-borns to run for their highest office...so why the hell should the United States -- the world's only remaining superpower -- do such a damned stupid thing?
37
posted on
12/18/2004 8:33:31 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: Clypp
"I have no objection to changing that requirement of native birth. It's not as if Ahnold is going to be elected anyways."
While, that's true, I think you'll find that most people on this site think that 250,000,000 or so native-born Americans is enough to choose from. We're real leery about second-guessing our founding fathers.
38
posted on
12/18/2004 8:36:06 PM PST
by
BobL
To: Prime Choice
The United States has allowed non-American's to be president before. It's still a super power.
39
posted on
12/18/2004 8:36:52 PM PST
by
Clypp
To: jakerobins
"F" him!
Looks like the Kali. citizens voted for Arnie and got Maria Kennedy.
I am SO VERY GLAD Arnie cannot run for prez, it is scary to see how many people vote their emotions over common sense.
40
posted on
12/18/2004 8:39:37 PM PST
by
Richard-SIA
("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
To: Clypp
The United States has allowed non-American's to be president before. Name them and when they served.
41
posted on
12/18/2004 8:42:13 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: BobL
Clinton promised to end welfare as we know it.I don't remember a promise like that....but I do remember that the welfare reform during the time was FORCED onto Clinton by a Republican congress....and the increase in the stock market during that time can be tracked ALMOST TO THE DAY that the Republicans took over the check book in the house!
To: Prime Choice
Chester Arthur, the 21st person to hold the presidency was born 1829 in Dunham Flats, Quebec. He moved to the United States at the age of one.
43
posted on
12/18/2004 8:46:43 PM PST
by
Clypp
To: Taggart_D
"Clinton promised to end welfare as we know it."
"I don't remember a promise like that...."
No - he did, and it was central in his 1992 campaign. After he was elected, he was told by the Dem-controlled Congress, in no uncertain term, that the idea was DOA (not that his heart was ever in it, in the first place).
I was only when, as you noted, the Republicans forced it down his throat did it get to his desk - and was signed (to his credit).
44
posted on
12/18/2004 8:49:39 PM PST
by
BobL
To: Clypp
Chester Arthur, the 21st person to hold the presidency was born 1829 in Dunham Flats, Quebec. He moved to the United States at the age of one. This would be interesting, were it not for Title 8 of the U.S. Code, Section 1401, which defines citizens of the United States at birth as:
- Anyone born inside the United States
- Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
- Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
- Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
- Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
- A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
And it's a bit interesting that Arthur was apparently the last such "foreigner" allowed into our highest office. Sounds like we learned our lesson.
45
posted on
12/18/2004 8:56:33 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
To: Clypp
I have no objection to changing that requirement of native birth.I do.
I also don't think it will ever happen.
46
posted on
12/18/2004 9:05:59 PM PST
by
Col Freeper
(Why Ted Kennedy hates the Bush aircraft landing scene? Imagine Ted in a flight suit!)
To: jakerobins
47
posted on
12/18/2004 9:07:17 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
To: Prime Choice
THAT looks an awful lot like Kool-Aid.
48
posted on
12/18/2004 9:11:56 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(REMEMBER THE ALGOREAMO--relentlessly hammer on the TRUTH, like the Dems demand recounts)
To: Clypp
49
posted on
12/18/2004 9:15:02 PM PST
by
nj26
To: nj26
"White House bio says he was born in Vermont."
Nice job on the research. Looks like there's deception taking place on this thread. Obviously someone wants this amendment real bad.
...and that's precisely what raises my suspicions about the whole thing.
50
posted on
12/18/2004 9:18:42 PM PST
by
BobL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson