Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Rummy say THAT?
Fox News Channel | 12/24/04 9:56 AM PST | Null and Void

Posted on 12/24/2004 10:02:37 AM PST by null and void

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: DoughtyOne

I agree with you. No doubt the news media and the Democrats would have made political hay of it, but I believe the American people would understand that it might be necessary to shoot down a plane rather than have terrorists crash it into a city, killing all the passengers anyway and taking thousands more lives as well.

At the time, I thought that if it had to be shot down, they should have just said so, instead of covering it up like a clinton. Now I'm not so sure, after having watched for the past four years the way the Democrats and the gutterspawn in the media use such tragedies for political purposes.


61 posted on 12/24/2004 11:16:12 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

link?


62 posted on 12/24/2004 11:16:29 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Much ado about NOTHING!


63 posted on 12/24/2004 11:17:43 AM PST by Reagan Man ("America has spoken")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I agree with the points you made. With regard to the last one, it's clear that one party has this nation's best interests at heart, most of the time. The other is just flat out anti-American with regard to just about every issue in it's zeal to regain power. And I might add, anti-Christian as well to the list.


64 posted on 12/24/2004 11:20:06 AM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I can't remember where I read it, but one of the accounts I read of this incident stated that Flight 93 had been ordered shot down, but there were no armed military aircraft in the vicinity that could intercept the flight. A training flight of unarmed USAF fighters were racing to intercept Flight 93 when it was brought down by the passengers. If the passengers had not brought the flight down, these USAF pilots were prepared to crash their planes into Flight 93 in order to prevent the highjackers from carrying out their attack on what was believed to be either the White House or the Capitol Building.


65 posted on 12/24/2004 11:25:01 AM PST by DJ Taylor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Is your day that unexciting?


66 posted on 12/24/2004 11:28:59 AM PST by verity (The Liberal Media is America's Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deetes
Fox news alert. we were watching it here at work, when we heard him state "shot the airplane down over Pennsylvania.."
It may have been that he "misspoke", but either way he said it.
67 posted on 12/24/2004 11:30:37 AM PST by firehunter (We deserve what we put up with...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Did he mention the lizard people?


68 posted on 12/24/2004 11:32:19 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

The transcript is edited.
We ALL heard it here at work, he clearly said
"...SHOT the aircraft down over Pennsylvania..."
You can skip the " tinfoil alert" business.
If he misspoke fine, but he still said it.


69 posted on 12/24/2004 11:34:05 AM PST by firehunter (We deserve what we put up with...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Dave278
Much better, the voices are silent. Now what is our next mission?

/sarcasm

70 posted on 12/24/2004 11:44:33 AM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Never underestimate the power of a cacophony of Cowbells played in unison...It shocks the mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Ah, you invoked the "Red Bird" rule:

Don't Molest
Your Nest

71 posted on 12/24/2004 11:45:29 AM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Ping


72 posted on 12/24/2004 11:51:47 AM PST by VNam68 (Merry Xmas to everyone!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Oh my God! did Rumsfeld say that? This is big! Does anyone else know this? We have to get this out! This will certainly fuel the momentum to get him removed from office.

The Demonrats stole the election for Govenor in WA and we get excited by a slip of the tongue by the most successful and brilliant Secretary of Defense?


73 posted on 12/24/2004 11:52:28 AM PST by dirtymac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firehunter

I can hear Rumsfeld and every other bureaucrat in DC saying:

"Don't say shot, don't say shot, don't ever say the word shot!"


74 posted on 12/24/2004 11:54:53 AM PST by OwnershipSociety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: null and void
i don't know what the odds are for it getting shot down at the same time it was being retaken by Todd Beamer and others but they must REALLY by UP there... i too vote any debris came from flight outside the design envelope
75 posted on 12/24/2004 11:57:45 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©® - Dubya... F**K YEAH!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
At the time, I thought that if it had to be shot down, they should have just said so, instead of covering it up like a clinton. Now I'm not so sure, after having watched for the past four years the way the Democrats and the gutterspawn in the media use such tragedies for political purposes.

Please people, stop it! The airplane was NOT shot down. Do you understand how many people would have to be silenced in order to hide the facts? Consider this point; the F16s return to base in Hampton without some of their munitions. Don't you think somebody would ask what you shot at? Could you keep everyone involved with the aircraft silent? Bull!

Have you read or seen a single report from any of the air traffic controllers at Cleveland or New York Centers who would have vectored the fighters to the location of the United flight? No, because their were no military airplanes near UAL93!

Sometimes things are just as they are reported.

MoodyBlu

76 posted on 12/24/2004 12:04:39 PM PST by MoodyBlu (Still searching for the elusive tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Context was he was telling the troops about the ongoing terrorist threat, enumerating a few incidents. Something like: "the people who hijacked the planes on 9/11 and flew them into the WTC and Pentagon, the people who shot down the flight in PA"

In that context, it's pretty clear that the "people" Rummy was talking about were terrorists. Not our own military, even if we make the assumption that Flight 93 was intercepted and shot down by the US.

If he meant "shot down" by terrorists, that would mean that on 9/11 Osama's minions had an air-to-air capable a/c flying that day (not bloody likely), or engaged Flt. 93 with a surface to air missile (why even bother to hijack the plane in that case?).

My vote is on "misspoke".

77 posted on 12/24/2004 12:28:37 PM PST by Denver Ditdat (Ronald Reagan belongs to the ages now, but we preferred it when he belonged to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Denver Ditdat

FoxNews was showing feeds of Rummy's speeches as early as 5;00 a.m. CST. Rummy gave about 4 or 5 brief 'thank you troops' speeches. Each one was basically the same.

I can accept that he misspoke, this being the last in a near-half-dozen similar speeches he gave today.

Those speeches were more like 'thank you troops talks', rather than formal prepared speeches, too.


78 posted on 12/24/2004 12:35:54 PM PST by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: verity

Yes. Thank God.


79 posted on 12/24/2004 12:39:26 PM PST by null and void (I refuse to live my life as if someone, somewhere will be offended if I laugh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Nope. If he had, I would have mentioned it...


80 posted on 12/24/2004 12:40:02 PM PST by null and void (I refuse to live my life as if someone, somewhere will be offended if I laugh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson