[OKSooner]

Maybe nuclear bombs set off in the tsunami just as it's approaching shore to disperse it and vaporize the water into the atmosphere?

That might work.

[Quix]

If the goal were saving lives on the shore, it would be rather counter productive!

And, would probably take a lot of tactical nukes hitting the water in a line at precisely the right point and timing.

Sounds like another unrealistic wild fantasy, to me.

[downtoliberalism]

Maybe nuclear bombs set off in the tsunami just as it's approaching shore to disperse it and vaporize the water into the atmosphere?
---

This tsunami was 600 miles wide. Does a nuclear bomb consume 600 miles?

[FatherofFive]

"Maybe nuclear bombs set off in the tsunami just as it's approaching shore to disperse it and vaporize the water into the atmosphere?
That might work."

Too funny! People talked about using nuclear devices to stop hurricanes, as well. The lack of basic scientific knowledge is mind-numbing.

[Poohbah]

Maybe nuclear bombs set off in the tsunami just as it's approaching shore to disperse it and vaporize the water into the atmosphere?

And if you blow the timing, you get a radioactive tsunami hitting the shore.