Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To boost party support, strategists tell Democrats to look West
Boston Globe ^ | December 30, 2004 | Susan Milligan

Posted on 12/30/2004 1:19:42 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

WASHINGTON -- Democratic strategists, searching for ways to broaden support, are urging the party to put new emphasis on the West, where they say state and local election results and demographic changes reflect political opportunity in a region long dominated by Republicans.

Party leaders acknowledge that the noncoastal Western states, which voted last month largely for George W. Bush for president, are hardly a Democratic bastion. But population trends are making such states as Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico more fertile territory for a future Democratic presidential contender, and such rock-hard Republican states as Montana and Wyoming are displaying Democratic tendencies, they said.

They note that Bush's aggressive Iraq policies are arousing concern in the traditionally isolationist West, even among longtime Republicans, and that several local environmental initiatives were approved in states where the administration wants to permit drilling for oil and gas and the storage of nuclear waste. An influx of Hispanics has also changed the political composition of several states in the region, making them more hospitable for Democrats.

Southern conservatives in both parties are attracted by social issues such as gay marriage, abortion, and religious values, a mix that made the region tough territory for Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kerry, analysts and party leaders said. But the West's strong independent streak and Hispanic population will give Democrats a fighting chance there in 2006 and 2008, said Simon Rosenberg, president of the New Democrat Network.

''What I believe is going on right now is that Bush's brand of conservatism, which is playing very well among social conservatives, is not playing well among libertarians," said Rosenberg, who is mulling a run for chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee. ''The West has a very different brand of conservatives and liberals than the South."

Environmental issues may also play...

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Colorado; US: Montana; US: Nevada; US: New Mexico; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: 2008; arizona; bushcountry; colorado; democraticparty; dnc; election; environmentalists; kerrydefeat; liberals; montana; nevada; newmexico; politics; westernvote; wyoming

1 posted on 12/30/2004 1:19:43 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Calling Naomi Wolfe! Calling Naomi Wolfe!

Maybe she can "dress" 'em up so they are suitable for public display.


2 posted on 12/30/2004 1:21:47 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Dream on.... the Democrats think California style tax and spend policies will play well in the Rock Mountain West? We're about to find out in the next two years how much Westerners like liberalism.


3 posted on 12/30/2004 1:23:06 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The only reason Wyoming and Montana were closer than usual is because that Constitutional candidate Perouted made a semi-strong showing there...

New Mexico is a weird state, but it wont be close much longer. Arizona wasnt that close and Nevada will widen out again.

We will have to see about Colorado....I am not so sure the analysis is correct on here either...


4 posted on 12/30/2004 1:29:24 AM PST by MikefromOhio (11 days until I can leave Iraq and stop selling hot dogs in Baghdad....and boycotting boycotts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

For some reason libertarians have become stalking horses for the Democrats. I can't explain why Michael Badnarik gets in bed with people he has nothing in common with. But hey if those types think the Democrats have changed, the folks in the Mountain West are in for a rude awakening.


5 posted on 12/30/2004 1:35:56 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I dont know...

while the Democrats seem to be trumpeting how many voters they got this past election, those numbers are not sustainable since the President wont be running. Assuming we dont nominate Jeb, the Anybody But Bush crowd will probably not vote (it was worth 30 million this time around)...

The Democrats are hoping people like Perouted and Badbreath-nik can take away a few million votes combined to make it a race....


6 posted on 12/30/2004 1:43:40 AM PST by MikefromOhio (11 days until I can leave Iraq and stop selling hot dogs in Baghdad....and boycotting boycotts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The Dems are after the independent voters .. they tried it this past election but weren't very successful

(IMO) .. unless there is a Big ticket 3rd party running .. they don't have much of a chance taking votes away from the GOP

The Dems are hoping for another Ross Perot

7 posted on 12/30/2004 1:51:44 AM PST by Mo1 (Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I expect that most here will scoff at this.

But I have been here long enough to see how senator Harry Reid (D-NV) is using his power to reshape Nevada in order to make it more liberal.

Take a look at how much "wilderness area" he keeps making available to his developer friends, who then build more housing to expand the liberal bastion of Las vegas. He is working to raid the other counties water, in order to prevent L.V. from being "built out" before he can use it can to bring his plan to fruition.

Note that L.V. has annexed virtually the entire county, and is now working to make South Lincoln County a L.V. bed-room community.

Once liberal L.V. has enough votes to overwhelm all other counties election preferences Sierra Harry and his liberal allies will move the capitol to L.V., gerrymander the districts, and do their best to make Nevada a new Kalifornia!

Before you scoff, take a look at the recent patterns of growth and development in Nevada, who is behind them, and who is profiting.


8 posted on 12/30/2004 1:55:10 AM PST by Richard-SIA ("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The Dems are after the independent voters ..

Their idea of "trap shooting" is the shooting of pigs out of the sky too.

Take consistent breath's and don't hold even a one because of this professed liberal revelation!

9 posted on 12/30/2004 2:06:04 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA
But I have been here long enough to see how senator Harry Reid (D-NV) is using his power to reshape Nevada in order to make it more liberal.

I agree he is someone to keep an eye on

The man talks out of both sides of his mouth and most folks don't notice

10 posted on 12/30/2004 2:10:49 AM PST by Mo1 (Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The massive increase in our Hispanic population during the Bush years will ensure a permanent conservative majority....

And one plus one equals whatever Karl Rove tells me it does.

11 posted on 12/30/2004 2:12:29 AM PST by dagnabbit (Amnesty is Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
For some reason libertarians have become stalking horses for the Democrats. I can't explain why Michael Badnarik gets in bed with people he has nothing in common with.

The only reason I can figure why Badnarik is acting like this is because it's the only way he can get any "exposure," any attention at all--he saw last election how much attention Nader got, and maybe that's what he wants (never mind that it was very negative, at least from the p.o.v. from the left hehehe). And before Nader, Perot. He apparently even stated several times before the election that he wanted to cost Bush the election and would be advertising heavily in crucial states to that effect. And he parroted the democrat lie about the draft during a televised 3rd party debate at Columbia U., I heard him! The guy is nothing but a troublemaker in my book.

12 posted on 12/30/2004 2:54:28 AM PST by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
while the Democrats seem to be trumpeting how many voters they got this past election, those numbers are not sustainable since the President wont be running. Assuming we dont nominate Jeb, the Anybody But Bush crowd will probably not vote (it was worth 30 million this time around)...

Exactly--anybody who thinks that anything in politics is "static" is crazy. All those voters who voted for Kerry won't necessarily be voting democrat next time around, and the same goes for those who went for Bush. There were some who 'switched' from Gore in 2000 to Bush in 2004, just as there were those who voted for Kerry instead of Bush again.

13 posted on 12/30/2004 2:58:59 AM PST by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Ramsey Clark (a.k.a. Traitorous POS) is defending Saddam and the Rats wonder why they lose elections??? HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!


14 posted on 12/30/2004 5:15:59 AM PST by rickmichaels ("We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American way." - Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
An influx of Hispanics has also changed the political composition of several states in the region, making them more hospitable for Democrats.

This is the only real policy they have, what they're really counting on, all the rest is just window dressing.

15 posted on 12/30/2004 11:14:44 AM PST by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; Howlin; goldstategop; MikeinIraq; Mo1; Richard-SIA; EGPWS; dagnabbit; gop_gene; ..
The West has always been more "progressive" in both ideological directions right and left - spearheading woman's rights and spearheading the the religiously inspired temperance movement. The West is an amalgamation - sort of what used to be called Reagan Democrats. Don't take the West for granted as a "Republican/Conservative" stronghold like we do with the South.
16 posted on 12/30/2004 1:45:01 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Democratic strategists, searching for ways to broaden support, are urging the party to put new emphasis on the West.

The dems will be lucky if they can hang onto Washington and Oregon in 2008!


17 posted on 12/30/2004 3:31:30 PM PST by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson