Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abigail Adams
Fifty years ago, women didn't generally work outside the home. Should we go back to that as "normal"?

Yes.

Well, we'd lose almost half of our workforce if we did.

Wages would then increase.

616 posted on 01/03/2005 6:58:24 PM PST by don-o (Stop Freeploading. Do the right thing and become a Monthly Donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies ]


To: don-o

I am not a fem-bot. But I do not want to be told that as a woman, my only contribution to society is to breed.

Some women have brilliant minds, special skills, wonderful ideas. And it would be a shame if we returned to the days were women were relegated to the kitchen and nursery.

Certainly there is something to be said for a woman staying at home with young children, if it is possible and if she wants to. But that doesn't mean she can't have a rewarding career if she wants one.

This is the twenty-first century, is it not?

I'm still waiting for someone to explain how not having kids is selfish.

Obviously, I feel strongly about this topic because we have decided not to have kids. If women's only value to society is to breed, and I'm not breeding, then I guess my life is worthless. (sarcasm off)


622 posted on 01/03/2005 9:09:56 PM PST by Abigail Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]

To: don-o
Wages would then increase.

Lump of labor fallacy.

623 posted on 01/03/2005 9:15:19 PM PST by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson