Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rehnquist Back at Supreme Court Part Time
Yahoo.com news ^ | Wed Jan 5, 2005 | Gina Holland

Posted on 01/06/2005 12:16:13 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi

WASHINGTON - Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist is back at work part time at the Supreme Court, but there is no word that he is ready to return to the bench. Rehnquist missed about 25 court arguments in November and December while receiving chemotherapy and radiation for thyroid cancer. A Supreme Court spokeswoman said Wednesday that the 80-year-old chief justice returned to the building late last month. "He's been working from both the court and home," spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said. Few details have been released about Rehnquist's condition. The chemotherapy-radiation treatment is common for the aggressive and life-threatening type of thyroid cancer. "It's pleasantly surprising that he is able to come back to work. It implies that the tumor is somewhat under control," said Dr. Kenneth Burman, a thyroid specialist at Washington Hospital Center who is not involved in Rehnquist's treatment. The new information about Rehnquist's work schedule sheds little light on whether his retirement is imminent. The court hasn't had a vacancy in more than a decade, a modern-era record, and Rehnquist had been considered the leading prospect to leave even before his cancer diagnosis in October. The announcement does put to rest speculation that Rehnquist is bedridden, Northwestern University law professor Lawrence Marshall said, and indicates the chief justice, known for his stubbornness, hopes to return to the bench. "It certainly doesn't surprise me that if anyone would fight hard to continue it would be him," Marshall said. "If he's unable to come back and sit routinely in all cases, he'll ultimately decide it's time to go." It is unclear if Rehnquist will preside next week when the court returns from the holidays. He has accepted an invitation swear in President Bush (news - web sites) on Jan. 20. Rehnquist had been away from court since Oct. 22 when he was hospitalized and then underwent a tracheotomy to help him breathe. At the time, Rehnquist said he expected to be back at work in a week. He later had to acknowledge that was unrealistic. Arberg said Rehnquist began coming into the office the week of Dec. 20. She would not say what his working hours are. The justices' comings and goings are little noticed. They arrive at work through an underground garage, escorted in court cars with tinted windows. Their offices are sealed off from the public. Rehnquist, who marks his 33rd anniversary on the court on Friday, reduced his work load during his cancer treatment. He is not participating in decisions from the dozen cases heard in November — in the early days of his treatment — unless the remaining eight justices are deadlocked. He is expected to take part in the December cases, relying on briefs and transcripts of the arguments. The University of Arizona was notified this week that Rehnquist would not be able to teach there this year. He has taught a two-week class at the university for the past decade, usually in February.

On the Net:

Supreme Court: < http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ >


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appointments; bush; justice; rehnquist; scotus; supremecourt; w
For those who think that Hon. Rehnquist will remain vacant... in a hurry. The problem is not only with the CJ, but also with many other seats. Liberal Judge Hon. Stevens is a good example: he is octogenary and he don't believe that any (not liberal) younger jurist could replace him. Do they hope in the mirage of a different majority in 2006? It's an illusion, 'cause we'll be the majority for a long long time!
1 posted on 01/06/2005 12:16:14 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CThomasFan; Libertina; superskunk; presidio9; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; ...

PING


2 posted on 01/06/2005 12:16:36 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

It's always a "part-time" job. He can handle it, I'm sure.


3 posted on 01/06/2005 12:29:13 AM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

The Judicial branch of the govt has gotten way out of hand. They've been doing a little more damage to this country year after year for decades. Now we have a chance to fill both the Supreme Court and subordinate federal courts with good, decent, sensible, patriotic jurists. We cannot let this opportunity pass. We may never see another like it.

We must encourage our senators to use the nuclear option at any hint of a filibuster. There's nothing wrong with doing it, and given this kind of an opportunity, the left certainly would.


4 posted on 01/06/2005 12:31:23 AM PST by superskunk (Quinn's Law: Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: superskunk

Dear great friend, I AGREE with you!


5 posted on 01/06/2005 12:34:18 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Was on my why to bed and noticed I got a ping from you.

Good topic! I couldn't resist putting in my two cents worth.

Anyway, I'm off to bed, my friend. Chat with you tomorrow.
6 posted on 01/06/2005 12:37:42 AM PST by superskunk (Quinn's Law: Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: superskunk

Ok, bye. Chat tomorrow!


7 posted on 01/06/2005 12:38:35 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Dr Dobson and Focus on the Family have other thoughts than Judge Stevens. They will target 6 senators if the Democrats start nonsense. That means that 6 or 7 Democrats could bolt from following the Democratic line to help win re-election.

That would give Republicans 61/62 votes. Also, if any Republican thinks about becoming a temporary Democrat, they will be hammered by Dr. Dobson and Focus on the Family.

8 posted on 01/06/2005 2:08:59 AM PST by topher (In God We Trust -- on the money of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Good News!


9 posted on 01/06/2005 2:09:30 AM PST by topher (In God We Trust -- on the money of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

That's OK but I think that, to beat filibustering, we don't need a new election; simply, we need a reform of Senate rules. Soon!


10 posted on 01/06/2005 2:22:42 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: topher

Thanks!


11 posted on 01/06/2005 2:22:58 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Thanks for the ping!


12 posted on 01/06/2005 10:05:02 AM PST by Alamo-Girl (Please donate monthly to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson