Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear Submarine Runs Aground South of Guam
The Associated Press ^ | Jan 8, 2005 | The Associated Press

Posted on 01/08/2005 3:19:47 AM PST by Jet Jaguar

HONOLULU (AP) - A nuclear submarine ran aground about 350 miles south of Guam, injuring several sailors, one of them critically, the Navy said.

There were no reports of damage to the USS San Francisco's reactor plant, which was operating normally, the Navy said.

Jon Yoshishige, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Fleet based at Pearl Harbor, said the Friday afternoon incident is under investigation and the 360-foot submarine was headed back to its home port in Guam.

Details on the sailors' injuries were not immediately available. The sub has a crew of 137, officials said.

Military and Coast Guard aircraft from Guam were en route to monitor the submarine and assist if needed, the Navy said.

Guam is a U.S. territory about 3,700 miles southwest of Hawaii.

---

On the Net:

U.S. Pacific Fleet: http://www.cpf.navy.mil

AP-ES-01-08-05 0343EST


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: guam; shipwreck; silentservice; ssn711; submarine; usn; usssanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,101-1,102 next last
To: Rebelbase; Doohickey; fastattacksailor

Sonat sphere itself is flooded, lost at least two, maybe 4 of the 6 main ballast tanks forward.

The fwd hull on a 688 is usually "up" at almost a 8-10 degree slant, with about 1/5 of the GRP sonat dome exposed - all of that is underwater in this picture.

Look at a photo of a "normal" 688 floating: you'll see an amazing difference.


901 posted on 01/10/2005 5:49:05 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies]

To: All

My son called last night about 1:30 am MST and said the sub made it into Port.
This was a bad collision and a traumatic experience for them all. They are lucky to be alive.


902 posted on 01/10/2005 5:50:33 AM PST by nmrancher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies]

To: SS Guy

I had the pleasure of meeting CAPT Ned Beach once. We had touched briefly on the subject of THRESHER and he was irritated by the way the Navy had renamed the class.

He thought it to be a slap at those on eternal patrol THRESHER and a way of 'erasing' history.

Ever read "The THRESHER Disaster"? Her Reactor Control Officer, LCDR McCoole (then a LT) was pretty outspoken on the shabby work done on her at Portsmouth. McCoole was a Mustang, an IC man that was an ITC(SS) aboard NAUTILUS than was commissioned.

He was critical of the workmanship in THRESHER to the brass right after her accident, as a result his career was shot to hell.


903 posted on 01/10/2005 5:52:15 AM PST by fastattacksailor (The US without the UN is like not having your mother-in-law with you on your honeymoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Yeah, she took a beating---trimmed down pretty far forward would be an understatement.


904 posted on 01/10/2005 5:55:41 AM PST by fastattacksailor (The US without the UN is like not having your mother-in-law with you on your honeymoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 901 | View Replies]

To: nmrancher

An answer to prayer. I'm so glad and relieved your son is o.k. and he was able to give you a call.


905 posted on 01/10/2005 6:05:51 AM PST by Lakeside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

To: nmrancher

Luck and in no small measure the training and dedication of your son and the rest of San Fran's crew. Prayers to all.


906 posted on 01/10/2005 6:12:00 AM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

To: All

Although I am no longer a submariner officially, I'm still a submariner at heart, and that heart goes out to my shipmates on the San Fran. I served with a sonarman who transferred over to the San Fran as she was leaving for Guam.

A few weeks before that happened, there was another death on that boat. An FT died in his sleep while underway. They found him in his rack when he didn't report for watch. Almost like that boat has a curse on it or something.

God bless the men of the San Francisco. God bless the men of the Silent Service.


907 posted on 01/10/2005 6:16:25 AM PST by Hostel (You can find all of this information on the net. GOD BLESS GOOGLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

To: Hostel

AMEN STS2/SS USS Glenard P. Lipscomb


908 posted on 01/10/2005 6:19:44 AM PST by bmwcyle (Washington DC RINO Hunting Guide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies]

To: Hostel
Although I am no longer a submariner officially...

There are no expiration dates on Dolphins!! Are you a member of USSVI? (United States Submarine Veterans, Inc) If not go to www.ussvi.org and join up, join over 11,000 of your shipmates. We have a national convention each year, there is the American Submariner Magazine that comes with the membership and most important, the fellowship and brotherhood. Be with and talk to guys who understand what you've done and where you have been.

End lecture.

SS Guy
909 posted on 01/10/2005 6:52:11 AM PST by SS Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; Doohickey
The fwd hull on a 688 is usually "up" at almost a 8-10 degree slant, with about 1/5 of the GRP sonat dome exposed - all of that is underwater in this picture. Look at a photo of a "normal" 688 floating: you'll see an amazing difference.

Stock photos

USS San Fransico

Compare the stock 688 photos with the USS SF and compare the freeboard. That sub is hurtin'.

910 posted on 01/10/2005 7:06:05 AM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 901 | View Replies]

To: fastattacksailor
"Ever read "The THRESHER Disaster"? Her Reactor Control Officer, LCDR McCoole (then a LT) was pretty outspoken on the shabby work done on her at Portsmouth."

Yes, I remember very well all of the heat the yardbirds took over the Thresher and the subsequent "investigations" that took place and all of the finger-pointing because of the "poor workmanship."

911 posted on 01/10/2005 7:22:32 AM PST by El Gran Salseron ( The replies by this poster are meant for self-amusement only. Read at your own risk. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 903 | View Replies]

To: jriemer

She's so far out of trim there nearly isn't any freeboard.

The damage must be unreal.

Kudos for getting her home, for sure. They sure had their hands full.


912 posted on 01/10/2005 7:25:16 AM PST by fastattacksailor (The US without the UN is like not having your mother-in-law with you on your honeymoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies]

To: El Gran Salseron

A friend of the family was a yardbird at EB when THRESHER went for permanent repair following her damage by a tug at Port Canveral. He said the same thing about all the problems THRESHER had with PNSY workmanship. I felt that he was being honest, but wasn't sure how much rivalry between EB and PNSY figured into it.


913 posted on 01/10/2005 7:30:56 AM PST by fastattacksailor (The US without the UN is like not having your mother-in-law with you on your honeymoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 911 | View Replies]

To: fastattacksailor
When I was at new construction at EB there was no love lost between Portsmouth and EB, though there were a few problems at EB as well. We had one major incident of sabotage when a major wire way was completely cut through very carefully right under a holding strap.

The result of the Thresher sinking was Portsmouth never built another boat. They completed what was on their ways and all the work they got after that was repair after an extensive retraining program.

Rickover was always going through the yard looking at everything. He rode each boat on it's first sea trial. He was aboard for 3 days. Hated officers always had time for the enlisted as long as they knew their stuff. He realized that the crew operated the sub not the officers. He was exacting though.

EB did a good job on us despite the fact that the push was to get the boomers out the door. We were one of only 3 fast boats there and were the oldest design. Sturgeon and Narwhal were the other two. NR-1 was there, too.

Thresher did some remarkable things as a test platform before she sank like being the subject of an intense depth charging to test shock mountings and floating decks.

SS Guy
914 posted on 01/10/2005 7:47:05 AM PST by SS Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies]

To: fastattacksailor

The damage must be unreal.


Yes. The collision was to the bow and the outer hull is heavily damaged. My son said they had to run it with the nose slightly down. You'll have to excuse my ignorance about the parts of a boat; I was Army and a draftee at that.

My son said everybody worked very hard getting her back to port. He worked 33 hours before grabbing a few winks and then somebody dropped something on the deck above his rack and he jumped out of his rack before he realized that they were running on the surface and very slow.

Thank God the crew survived to be able to tell this story.
God bless the soul of the sailor who died and may his family find peace of mind.

Gotta run; ranch work to do; will be back in a few hours.


915 posted on 01/10/2005 7:57:22 AM PST by nmrancher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 912 | View Replies]

To: nmrancher

You have nothing to apologise for---I'm glad that your son is OK. Please be sure to let him know that he and his shipmates are VERY much in all our prayers. Their hard work bringing SAN FRANCISCO home makes all submariners proud of them.

G-D bless!

FAS


916 posted on 01/10/2005 8:36:49 AM PST by fastattacksailor (The US without the UN is like not having your mother-in-law with you on your honeymoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey; judicial meanz

This is appropriate:

Almighty, Everlasting God,
the Protector of all those who put their trust in Thee:
hear our prayers in behalf of Thy servants
who sail their vessels beneath the seas.
We beseech Thee to keep in Thy sustaining care
all who are in submarines,
that they may be delivered
from the hidden dangers of the deep.
Grant them courage,
and a devotion to fulfill their duties,
that they may better serve Thee and their native land.
Though acquainted with the depths of the ocean,
deliver them from the depths of despair
and the dark hours of the absence of friendliness
and grant them a good ship's spirit.
Bless all their kindred and loved ones
from whom they are separated.
When they surface their ships,
may they praise Thee for Thou art there
as well as in the deep.
Fill them with Thy Spirit
that they may be sure in their reckonings,
unwavering in duty,
high in purpose,
and upholding the honor of their nation.

Amen
the submariner's prayer - author unknown


917 posted on 01/10/2005 8:51:47 AM PST by HipShot ("Remember the first rule of gunfighting... have a gun." --Colonel Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 891 | View Replies]

To: dakine

It depends on the results of the investigation. If it is determined there were no obstructions mapped in the area and there was no way the incident could have been anticipated, the officer's career will not be adversely affected. Even so, I imagine he feels awful about it happening. My prayers and thoughts are with all of them.


918 posted on 01/10/2005 8:56:26 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SS Guy
The result of the Thresher sinking was Portsmouth never built another boat. They completed what was on their ways and all the work they got after that was repair after an extensive retraining program.

IIRC, there were some severe (union) labor problems while the Thresher was being built. I'd heard from a couple sources that the loss was caused by a valve stem being cut most of the way through.

919 posted on 01/10/2005 8:57:13 AM PST by null and void (I refuse to live my life as if someone, somewhere will be offended if I laugh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

That picture is amazing.

The forward MBT's must be barely operational. 688's sit really high forward. I can tell by the snorkel mast being bumped and the bubbly wake forward that they must have the LP blower on the tanks continuously.

These guys just proved American seamanship is the best in world. It must have been a super hard job to get that boat in port.

Hats off to every one of them, and God bless the casualties of this tragedy.


920 posted on 01/10/2005 9:01:58 AM PST by judicial meanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,101-1,102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson