Please summarize Rush re Fineman's bs in this oped.
I can't recall all of the specifics and had just gotten back in my car when I heard part of the discussion but this was one passage that he discussed:
It was not accident that the birth coincided with an identity crisis in the Democratic Party. The ideological energy of the New Deal had faded; Vietnam and various social revolutions of the 60s were tearing it apart. Into the vacuum came the AMMP...
Rush was saying that the social revolutions of the 1960s weren't tearing the Democrat Party apart (he was not explicit in saying it, but it was an internal struggle for power, after all the Democrats pushed us into Vietnam).
He did not continue with the rest of this passage.
I recall that he followed with discussion of:
Still, the notion of a neutral, non-partisan mainstream press was, to me at least, worth holding onto. Now it's pretty much dead, at least as the public sees things
Rush's response was along the lines of "of course you wanted to hold onto it, it pushed liberal propaganda as objective journalism".