Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry the Nazi: a defence of the idiot prince
London News Review ^ | 1-13-05 | Staff

Posted on 01/13/2005 5:47:48 PM PST by veronica

So, Prince Harry, the nightmheir to the throne, has put his intellectually subnormal foot in it again. Prince William’s half-witted half-brother attended a fancy dress party held by Richard Meade, the triple Olympic gold medallist (1968 & 1972), and his fancy dress consisted of Rommel shirt with a bright red Nazi armband on the sleeve. Oh, and he had a fag on. A veritable tsunami of bad taste.

Harry has been drawing a lot of flack for this gaff. Rabbi Jonathan Guttentag, leader of spiritual leader of the Whitefield Hebrew Congregation in Manchester, described the photo of a swastika-adorned Prince as "a most unfortunate gift to neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers." Michael Howard, leader of the Conservative Party (a fringe British political group), who is himself Jewish, said "I think a lot of people will be disappointed to see that photograph and it will cause a lot of offense."

So far, not a single voice has been raised in support of the plonker's actions. However, we at the London News Review are staunch fans of Harry and are ready and willing to mount a clumsy defence:

Our defence of Prince Harry

1. Prince Harry is sensationally stupid. Seriously, the lad is practically retarded, so it’s appropriate to cut him some slack. It’s a small miracle every time he finds his mouth with his cigarette, so the fact that he would put on a Nazi armband and not think – at any point – that this might possibly be a really really wrong thing to do, is perfectly understandable. Questions must be asked of the people around him: his friends, his carers, his bodyguards. Did no one think to mention to the dribbling moron that maybe the pretty red armband with the funny black squiggle in the middle was maybe best left in the limo? Would you blame a coma victim for wetting the bed? No. So don’t be too harsh on Harry.

2. The theme of the fancy dress party, thrown by famous horseman and friend of Prince Charles, Richarde Meade, was – believe it or not – ‘Colonials and Natives’. Oh lordy. Colonials and Natives? What the **** are these people on? What century are they living in? Colonials and Natives? It beggars belief. Why not ‘Imperialists and Nig Nogs’? Or would that have been bad taste? So anyway, a fair share of the blame for Harry’s outfit must surely go to the imbecilic Richarde Meade and his appalling choice of party theme.*

3. Where did Harry get the armband? Presumably he went for advice to his grandfather, who delightedly threw open his closet doors to reveal rack upon rack of Gestapo jackets stormtrooper boots. Or maybe Prince Philip simply slipped off his dressing gown to reveal his own swastika armband, which he rolled off and pressed lovingly into Harry’s upturned palm. “Now off you go, you young scamp, and have fun.”

4. No one seems to have wondered: perhaps Prince Harry didn’t realize it was a fancy dress party? It’s possible he just came on from a meeting, and didn’t have time to change. In which case it is heartening to see that he has developed an interest in politics. An early brush with fascism didn’t do Ricky Tomlinson any harm, so let’s go easy on Harry: he may well grow out of it, and soften in his politics towards Stalinism instead.

5. Most crucially: this was a fancy dress costume. In this context, the Nazi uniform has become a novelty, a bit of fun. This is surely a good thing. It is wrong to be scared of it: if we let the taboo linger, if we draw an amazed breath when we see Harry sporting the emblem of the Nazi party, then the swastika still has its power. So much better for us to think of it as a daft (yet undeniably stylish) outfit in a fancy dress shop, hanging alongside a wizard’s garb, a policeman’s uniform and a fairy costume. To treat the swastika in this way is not in any way to deny the seriousness and horror of the holocaust, but to remove the last vestiges of power from the Nazis. Little does Harry realize it, but his wearing of the swastika is an important political statement: it is the militant trivialization and belittling of Nazism. Mel Brooks should think about finding a bit part for him in the Producers. I bet he throws a wonderful salute.

¤

*Prince William went in a skin-tight leopard costume with tail and claws: a cleverly diplomatic outfit, although one has to ask what the heir to the throne was doing attending a party which had the theme 'Colonials and Natives'. Might it not have been more politically astute to have feigned a headache, stayed at home and watched a DVD of Zulu Dawn instead?


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: princeharry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Has anyone ever stopped to think that for some people the swastika doesn't symbolize racism and Nazi death dealing, but a proud old way of life that died out in 1945?

Which people would that be?

21 posted on 01/13/2005 6:18:07 PM PST by veronica (Got a script? Go here - http://www.filmmonterey.org/screenwriting.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fo0hzy

Not "springtime for Hitler"?


22 posted on 01/13/2005 6:18:12 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: veronica

WHO SAID THAT?!?!

*looks around*


23 posted on 01/13/2005 6:19:17 PM PST by fo0hzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

However, the swastika does not fit your other analogies. The Swastiks was an Eastern religious symbol of eternal recurrence -- not a part of German culture.

I'm sure most Germans were glad to be rid of it.

However, they still would cling to Mein Herr, Meine Dame, and Strudel, u.s.w.


24 posted on 01/13/2005 6:19:23 PM PST by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fo0hzy

Don't give up your day job.


25 posted on 01/13/2005 6:20:18 PM PST by veronica (Got a script? Go here - http://www.filmmonterey.org/screenwriting.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: conservative cat

Ahhhh... Thanks for clarifying.


26 posted on 01/13/2005 6:21:33 PM PST by Born Conservative (Those who hate you don't win unless you hate them. And then you destroy yourself." Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fo0hzy

"But I think I heard a snicker"

You could have heard me laugh.


27 posted on 01/13/2005 6:22:57 PM PST by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Last word <--- mine!!


28 posted on 01/13/2005 6:24:03 PM PST by fo0hzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I predict that we will soon see Harry touring a former NAZI concentration camp. Where he will have a very amazed look on his face, cry a bit, say he is sorry, then be off to play another day. Eventually, he will do something equally stupid or worse. After which he will have an amazed look on his face, cry a bit, say he is sorry then repeat the process.

Harry is a lucky kid for many reasons. Mainly because he does not have his fathers ears. Or, more accurately, he does not have Charles's ears or his looks. Poor Charles, who is supposedly Harry's father and a man in love with a woman who looks like a horse. Which I guess is OK because Charles looks like a horse too.

The British royal family could all drop dead tomorrow and the world world be no more the worse. In America, I guess we could say the same thing about the Kennedy's. But they don't tend to drop dead. Just out of the sky sometimes.

29 posted on 01/13/2005 6:26:52 PM PST by isthisnickcool (Free Scott Peterson!!! In Iraq. Wearing an "Allah is the Devil" tee shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

30 posted on 01/13/2005 6:27:19 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

31 posted on 01/13/2005 6:28:54 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fo0hzy

ROTFLMAO. Nothing cuts down a dictator like laughing at his sorry a**.


32 posted on 01/13/2005 6:29:18 PM PST by coydog (My bathroom djinn can beat up your bathroom djinn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
To answer your question, and probably one of several to do so:

NO!

A) The swastika itself is not racist etc. It was around far to long before 1933 for that.
B) I served with an ex-SS soldier who was clearly not Nazi and was about the best soldier I knew.
C) A swastika arm band, on a faux nazi uniform, worn by a member of a British royalty imported from (oops) Germany, and considered fitting at a party dedicated to colonialism and the untermunchen, should be grounds for being punted from both the royal family and society at large.

And, finally, "Mein Herr," or "Meine Dame," omits a couple of other "Meins" and "Heils" that carry far more accurate connotation than "sir" and "Madam".

33 posted on 01/13/2005 6:29:47 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Wonder where he got the costume.


34 posted on 01/13/2005 6:30:30 PM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Huh?


35 posted on 01/13/2005 6:31:47 PM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

It's being reported that Harry won't be attending any holocaust memorials.


36 posted on 01/13/2005 6:33:36 PM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: norton

"at a party dedicated to colonialism and the untermunchen"

indeed!

tho' perhaps making fun of the colonial attitude of superiority over the subject peoples??

As history shows, terror bombing of civilians (which came to its ultimate logic in WW II against Dresden, etc.) was invented by the British as a way of keeping the very numerous subject peoples in line -- when there was not enough British blood to do it on the ground man-to-man . . .


37 posted on 01/13/2005 6:35:17 PM PST by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: veronica

38 posted on 01/13/2005 6:36:26 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fo0hzy
I found your dancing Hitler amusing. Though I prefer Moe Howard's more nuanced performance.
39 posted on 01/13/2005 6:37:52 PM PST by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AMDG&BVMH

I think the Swastika was used by the Vikings...


40 posted on 01/13/2005 6:39:43 PM PST by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson