Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Now Question Cost of Inauguration
Yahoo.com news ^ | By WILL LESTER, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 01/13/2005 7:20:49 PM PST by alessandrofiaschi

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-196 next last
To: texasflower

wellllll....

It looks like you just proved my point! It is an issue that it worthy of DISCUSSION and obviously it is being discussed! If its such a slam dunk decision---then why would we even ask our military.


121 posted on 01/14/2005 5:18:08 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

IP ON AP


122 posted on 01/14/2005 5:19:11 AM PST by verity (The Liberal Media is America's Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
"Some Now Question Cost of Inauguration"

Mostly, those on the outside looking in!
Bwahahahaha!

123 posted on 01/14/2005 5:57:00 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texasflower
500,000? What a nutty figure.

That wouldn't even pay for basic security even for a very subdued event.

Where in the world would you come up with such a silly amount?

They're my tax dollars. I see no reason why they should be spent on an elaborate inauguration. It is not necessary for the operation of the country, thus it should be done as inexpensively as possible.

Presidents are elected to be the CEO of America, any CEO of a corporation who spent even $500,000 of stockholders money to celebrate his new position would be looking for a new job very soon.

Presidents are elected to run the country, not to be head of the Royal Family. It's time they started treating our hard-earned tax dollars with respect instead of a slush fund to be used for elaborate parades.

124 posted on 01/14/2005 7:32:46 AM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
**We surely could save many millions.**

You continue to *seemingly* not understand this money is from PRIVATE DONATIONS. Each American has the LIBERTY to spend what and where they want. Period.

So...did you vote in our election?

125 posted on 01/14/2005 8:35:00 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
**Janeane Garofalo's dual kneecap replacement surgery. **

good one!

126 posted on 01/14/2005 8:37:13 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
**Besides, the 40 millions comes from big industries and lobbies, just like it was for Clinton and so on. There is a problem in this system, and the Government should prevent to waste tax money... **

Jeez Louize! You STILL don't get it! The 40 mil comes from PRIVATE DONATIONS. ***I*** donated, along with millions of others. It is my FREEDOM to do so!

Did you vote in our last election? Yes...I'm asking again.

127 posted on 01/14/2005 8:39:05 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
**If its such a slam dunk decision---then why would we even ask our military. **

Why *wouldn't* you want to include our military in this? Did you serve?

128 posted on 01/14/2005 8:41:27 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Apparently these "some" were OK with clinton's spending.

And they seem to be OK with the feds' $2 trillion of annual non-defense spending.


129 posted on 01/14/2005 8:49:37 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Let's look through the archives for his screed against Clintoon's 2nd inaugural, shall we?
130 posted on 01/14/2005 10:45:05 AM PST by Mr. K (all your tagline are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle

You didn't read my original posts?

My comment was that it IS a point of "discussion" as to whether going all out on a celebration of the Inaugural is appropriate at a time of war and war casualties. I was saying that it is OK to have a DISCUSSSION about that. I then pointed out that, in fact, family members HAVE asked their loved ones serving in the military now and many have said "Yes, we want a big celebration." Therefore it WAS an issue of discussion; proving my point that to just have a discussion of this issue is entirely appropriate. ( I will rephrase this: "Why would we ask our military their feelings if we didn't think it was an an issue that we would want to know their feelings on it?")

You have misread that I suggested we "shouldn't " ask our military. And whether I served, or not, has nothing to do with my supporting our military, which I most definitely do!


131 posted on 01/14/2005 11:39:41 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

By the way .. I understand the $40 million being spent on the celebration IS ALL FROM PRIVATE DONATIONS.

So .. your precious public funds are safe.


132 posted on 01/14/2005 11:54:12 AM PST by CyberAnt (Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
My dear:

1) I don't consider public funds precious, but only not-to-waste for a short-lasting event (17,3 millions!).
2) The other 40 millions come from lobbyists, not from common citizens, and even if I wouldn't make anything to prevent this, I judge our system very spoilt.
133 posted on 01/14/2005 12:03:23 PM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

... And have a good day!

Bye.


134 posted on 01/14/2005 12:03:52 PM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

No dear. I don't think we need to ask the military. I was just relaying what my daughter's boyfriend told me.

It was to make a point that the military doesn't have a problem with it. They will be honored at this event and I think they will see this as a positive thing.

I know I do.


135 posted on 01/14/2005 12:57:36 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888

17.5 million that we will have to pay is not very much money in the overall scheme of things.

This is a historic event, whether you want to think so or not.

You are in the minority.


136 posted on 01/14/2005 1:00:05 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888

Besides the money the government is only paying for security.


What part of that is so hard for you to understand? The party is paid for by private donations.


137 posted on 01/14/2005 1:01:51 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

I hope President Bush walks out and lights a victory cigar with a $100 dollar bill.


138 posted on 01/14/2005 1:03:43 PM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle

The recovering hippie misunderstood what I was trying to say.

My daughter's boyfriend say President Bush deserves the biggest blow out in history. And he says the rest of his buddies say the same thing.

I wasn't suggesting we poll the military and then decide. I think you probably understood what I meant.


139 posted on 01/14/2005 1:31:26 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: texasflower

Why is everyone so threatened with a "discussion" of different views? The discussion seemed to bring out some really good reasons why we Should have a big party. If the out come of the discussion is that "yes, its a great idea and here's why", wonderful. Then we get even more positives about why an Inauguration party is meaningful.

No one has yet to address my whole point: A discussion on pros and cons is a good idea and that people can have differing opinions and don't have to get slammed.


140 posted on 01/14/2005 3:14:17 PM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson