Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Now Question Cost of Inauguration
Yahoo.com news ^ | By WILL LESTER, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 01/13/2005 7:20:49 PM PST by alessandrofiaschi

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last
To: texasflower

No dear.

Nowhere did I suggest we "poll" the military. Reread my posts. I pointed out that someone had quoted their military friends saying the Inauguration party was a positive thing.


141 posted on 01/14/2005 3:17:30 PM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

They didn't complain when Clinton held his party. This is a celebration of our Democracy.


142 posted on 01/14/2005 3:18:32 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texasflower

I guess my name "Recovering Ex Hippie" just evokes such an emotional reaction its hard to read my posts with detachment.
Get over it., or ask David Horowitz what it means.


143 posted on 01/14/2005 3:21:49 PM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888

Well, outside of the fact that most of the funding is private - lets cut to the chase about WHY we have the inaugurations. This is fund raising. This is where the party cash flow starts happening. The GOP, NRCC and NRSC need the cash flow. I haven't checked this yet but I'm pretty sure that there will be more inaugural parties this year than any other. And you better believe the President is going to be pressing some flesh and making appearances at most of them. This has little to do with real celebrating and has everything to with keeping the machine well greased.


144 posted on 01/14/2005 3:25:36 PM PST by stacytec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Money spent to counter MSM bias in election = $200 million

Cost of inauguration = $40 million

Pissing off liberals by partying hardy = Priceless!

145 posted on 01/14/2005 3:28:31 PM PST by N. Theknow (Twang your magic twangy Froggie! Hiyakids hiya hiya hiya! I'llbegood I'llbegood I'llbegood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: texasflower
Besides the money the government is only paying for security.

What part of that is so hard for you to understand? The party is paid for by private donations.

I'm not talking about the parties. I am talking about the extravagant parade with grandstands etc.

My tax dollars are paying for those elaborate arrangements and the security involved in securing the route. Anything beyond the security required for the White House grounds should come from private donations. If funds to pay for the extra security isn't paid up front from private donations then the parade shouldn't be held.

146 posted on 01/14/2005 3:34:30 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
Pissing off liberals by partying hardy = Priceless!

Exactly.

It's not like the Clinton's used their Inaugural money to feed the homeless.

147 posted on 01/14/2005 3:35:42 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (All we have to decide is what to do with the crap that we are given...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Don't fret about it too much. Republicans say they're for smaller government but they are a little less socialist than the Dems.


148 posted on 01/14/2005 3:38:24 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

I am with you. I was so disgusted in 2000 that the Dems robbed Bush of his winning celebration. Again, this past year he was robbed by the media and Kerry when they refused to call Ohio and Kerry delayed his concession speech. I say spend what it takes. The grander the better and screw the Dems. If the cost of inauguration should be reduced or traditions changed it should be decided in advance of the election. Seems to me money becomes a factor only when the Republicans are doing the spending. MoveOn could spend all they wanted to but 527's were bad! Pardon Me?


149 posted on 01/14/2005 3:49:23 PM PST by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: texasflower
17.5 million that we will have to pay is not very much money in the overall scheme of things.

Conservatives used to consider 17.5 million of my tax dollars to be a lot of money to spend. I guess Republicans aren't really as conservative as they claim to be. Maybe I've been wasting my votes and contributions for all these years.

This is a historic event, whether you want to think so or not.

This is the swearing in of the Nations CEO for the next four years. That does not rate wasting 17.5 million dollars of my hard earned tax dollars for something that is nonproductive. George Washington must be rolling in his grave.

You are in the minority.

If being fiscally Conservative is no longer part of the GOP then I'm in the wrong party. But I think you're the one who is in the minority. I hope a lot more people call their Congress critters and demand a cap on the cost of the Inaugurations. Anything over $500,000 is wasteful.

150 posted on 01/14/2005 3:49:26 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: stacytec
Well, outside of the fact that most of the funding is private - lets cut to the chase about WHY we have the inaugurations. This is fund raising. This is where the party cash flow starts happening. The GOP, NRCC and NRSC need the cash flow. I haven't checked this yet but I'm pretty sure that there will be more inaugural parties this year than any other. And you better believe the President is going to be pressing some flesh and making appearances at most of them. This has little to do with real celebrating and has everything to with keeping the machine well greased.

And my tax dollars should be used to pay for fund raising events? I don't think that's even legal.

151 posted on 01/14/2005 3:53:40 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Happygal

I posted a correction but I haven't seen it.

Thanks for noticing my flub [more than a mistake]

Frannie


152 posted on 01/14/2005 4:08:52 PM PST by frannie (I REPEAT --THE TRUTH WILL SET US ALL FREE--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Will Lester. A liberal masquerading as an objective journalist. See, AP does have an agenda and its liberal journalists have opinions like every one else but they think the American people are too stupid to notice what they're doing, that they miss the blatant bias in opinion pieces dressed up as straightforward news stories. As for the issue at hand - so what? The Inauguration is being paid for with privately raised funds. Its one event in our nation's history in which NOT a single dollar of hard-earned taxpayers' money is being spent. Libs are seething with hatred, rage and bile at President Bush and to them its also illegitimate to have a public function in which there's no stealing from the taxpayers' wallets. And they can't be happy about a unique event which happens only in America. A peaceful assumption or re-assumption of power is rare across this world. We've been doing it successfully in America for two centuries. The Left is so psychotically worked up about President Bush that it can't be happy for the American people, for our country or for our President. They still don't get it why they lost. Go figure.


153 posted on 01/14/2005 4:23:02 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mickie
I would have great respect for the President if he scaled down the balls and festivities in a time of war and natural disasters.

Implying that you WON'T have respect for him if he doesn't? Get real. It's just parties. If the government isn't paying for them, what does it matter to you? Besides, he's not staying up late at any of them. He and Laura went back to the White House just after midnight last time.

The parties are for those who supported the President, and they have every right to celebrate without wet blankets being thrown on them by folks who, for the most part, didn't want the President to win anyway.

154 posted on 01/14/2005 4:23:54 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Its horrible to liberals there should be a coming out party for Bush. That's what has them shouting til they're blue in the face. I love it!


155 posted on 01/14/2005 4:27:02 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shubi

They complain about American goodness. I was worried they might catch on. I'm glad to see nothing's changed. **How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Democrats**


156 posted on 01/14/2005 4:28:31 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Poser

Uh huh. You can bet you wouldn't hear a peep out of them about the cost of a Kerry Inauguration. Instead the legacy media would be blaring - "Its time to have a grand ball!"


157 posted on 01/14/2005 4:29:41 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Oh that? Its chump change. Its not like the money to protect our President is being wasted. Even the libs are not complaining about the public expenses portion of the Inaugural. Now THAT's funny!


158 posted on 01/14/2005 4:31:13 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

President Bush should agree and since DC loves making laws they should pass a new one. From here on out the people of America shall not celebrate the election of a new President in any manner that exceeds the price of a tailgate party at a football game (Professional or college game of course).

We should stop having "balls" and make the limp wristed pantie wearing sodomite loving liberals have one big picnic on the Whitehouse lawn. BYO of course.


159 posted on 01/14/2005 4:32:25 PM PST by winodog (I am gonna stop calling them liberals. They are humanists. Liberal is actually a good word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJL

Confiscate all that money and spend it one of the libs' pet projects. There, I feel so much better already. <sarcasm


160 posted on 01/14/2005 4:33:00 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson