Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/14/2005 12:50:33 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: SJackson
Good riddance.
2 posted on 01/14/2005 12:53:46 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
5 posted on 01/14/2005 12:58:51 PM PST by SJackson ( Bush is as free as a bird, He is only accountable to history and God, Ra'anan Gissin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

What a disloyal schmuck. Imagine doing this to the CEO of a company where you are employed and expecting to get away with it.


6 posted on 01/14/2005 12:59:13 PM PST by peyton randolph (CAIR supports TROP terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"Differences of opinion are something you as a citizen and I as a citizen should value in your government,'' Armitage said . . .

At least as long as it's a Dim Commie Traitor expressing the difference in opinion...

7 posted on 01/14/2005 1:00:19 PM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
One would think that on multiple occasions both Powell and Armitage have had sufficient face time with the president to acquaint him with their opinions and views. If that's the case, then why use the media? Public channels of communication in such a case are for those who do not have sufficient access to other means.
8 posted on 01/14/2005 1:00:40 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

So explains why the State Dept is inept and ineffective.


10 posted on 01/14/2005 1:02:56 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

< ...in an interview with National Public Radio's "Morning Edition''.. >

Says it all.

Excuse me, but who was it that was whining just last week that Bush only has "yes men" around him?


11 posted on 01/14/2005 1:03:11 PM PST by GOP_Proud (Those who proclaim tolerance have the least for my views.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

The effrontery is breathtaking.


12 posted on 01/14/2005 1:03:33 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"You don't want a government that sees everything the same way,'' Armitage said."

No. It would be antithetical to a dim witted, State Dept. bureaucrat that a single, effective Foreign Policy be enunciated to our allies and foes alike. Who's State Dept. does this guy work for, France's? IMO A real A$$ and I better not see him getting a Medal of Freedom Award soon!

18 posted on 01/14/2005 1:10:10 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Weren't they the perfect fit for State.


20 posted on 01/14/2005 1:12:45 PM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Stinkin' rat finks! Won't miss 'em.


22 posted on 01/14/2005 1:18:56 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
so the state department is admitting that they set their own policy agenda instead of implementing the president's like they are supposed to
and the irony is that united nations wannabee bureaucracy will and is getting away with it
28 posted on 01/14/2005 1:55:43 PM PST by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
I thought George Bush was elected President. I didn't even know that Armitage and Powell were on the ballot!

This is another data point on the meaning of a team player. When an issue is on the table, that is the time to present all points of view. However, once a decision has been made, it is back stabbing to take your point of view public and try to undermine the decision that was made.

I guess I'm not surprised at this admission from those involved.
29 posted on 01/14/2005 1:56:15 PM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Powell and Armitage, whose friendship was forged decades ago, share foreign policy views that are distinctly more moderate than those of Bush and other key presidential advisers. They also made far more use of media interviews and speeches to promote U.S. foreign policy than their predecessors.

I will be glad to hear no more of Mr. Armitage's "media interviews and speeches."

30 posted on 01/14/2005 2:06:49 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
It's not easy to have staff and subordinates that resist everything you want them to do like Powell had. (Yes, in the media's Bizarro World Powell's situation is morphed into Bush's).

The media desperately tried to invent a gulf, and obviously still won't give up the attempt. Considering how dramatically the president changed foreign policy after 9/11 Powell was a loyal subordinate of historical terms at the State Dept.

32 posted on 01/14/2005 2:21:47 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Glad colin powell is gone. I cannot wait until Condeleeza Rice cleans house.


34 posted on 01/14/2005 2:30:31 PM PST by Paul_Denton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

"I'd rather be feckless than relevant."


37 posted on 01/14/2005 3:04:03 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

I always knew he sucked BUMP!!


39 posted on 01/14/2005 3:41:18 PM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Just out of curiosity, isn't the State Department under the Executive branch of government?


40 posted on 01/14/2005 3:42:50 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

But you don't want a bunch of loose cannons running around State, making foreign policy, either.


43 posted on 01/14/2005 3:46:34 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson