Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim Group Targets Poster Nudity (Britain's slide into dhimmitude continues apace)
The Times [UK] ^ | January 22, 2005 | Nicola Woolcock

Posted on 01/21/2005 5:08:41 PM PST by quidnunc

Activists are getting bolder in a campaign of vandalising adverts that display naked flesh

Billboard adverts featuring partial nudity are being defaced by Muslim activists who are offended by displays of flesh.

The advertising watchdog has confirmed that increasing numbers of posters are being torn down or painted over in predominantly Islamic areas.

A website giving advice on how to vandalise billboards and listing potential targets has been set up by a group calling themselves Muslims Against Advertising (MAAD).

The campaign has gathered momentum since the Advertising Standards Authority banned an underwear advert from being sited near mosques.

Advertisements for perfume, hair dye, bras and television programmes are among those that have been attacked. Photographs of semi-dressed women are the most frequently targeted, with the offending body parts painted over or ripped off.

A poster advertising the Channel 4 programme Desperate Housewives is the most recent target; the images of two scantily-clad actresses have been torn from an East London billboard but three fully-dressed characters were left intact. Adverts bearing Dove’s “Real Women” adverts — six ordinary women pictured in their underwear — were painted over at several locations last year.

MAAD, based in Birmingham, gives an index of defaced adverts in the city, including Levi’s, Wonderbra, PaddyPower, a radio station and a strip club. It says on its website that it believes in “direct action” and “has paint and isn’t afraid to use it”, adding: “There is no longer any need to cringe as you walk past a sleazy poster, we’ll improve it.”

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: eurabia; ukmuslims
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-292 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

To: dAnconia

A very gracious (and completely non-flirtatious) thank you, and oiche mhaith (that's gaelic for g'nite).

*LOL*

This place is great fun of a Friday night, all the same *L*


162 posted on 01/21/2005 8:45:27 PM PST by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Information from a discussion board on the Guardian site

Opium advert reeks of exploitation

... How the new lads will swoon to hear that a woman's best moments are to be found wearing nothing but perfume and six inch gold stilettos, spreadeagled in classic porn star pose, squeezing her breasts in invitation.

The Opium advert is simply another example of a multinational industry using a male fantasy of women's sexuality to sell its product.
...

163 posted on 01/21/2005 8:55:07 PM PST by niki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
per the article:

A poster advertising the Channel 4 programme Desperate Housewives is the most recent target; the images of two scantily-clad actresses have been torn from an East London billboard

per you:

but the issue is whether or not nekkid wimmin pictures are suitible for use in commercial billboards.

Please show me where the article said “nekkid women.”

My point – they are imposing their standards of unacceptability which is considerably short of pornography. Pornography is already banned in Billboards.

It really doesn't matter if the protagonists in this case are Moslems or Jehovah's Witnesses.

Also I don't see Jehovah's Witness tearing down anything or any violence for that matter.

164 posted on 01/21/2005 9:06:41 PM PST by dervish (Europe can go to Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Here there's an implication that you will find sexual satisfaction"

Scantily dressed men and women in ads draw attention to the ads.


165 posted on 01/21/2005 9:19:46 PM PST by philetus (Zell Miller - One of the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: niki

Didn't click your link.

But I only need to smell opium to know it sucks. It's a horrible scent.


166 posted on 01/21/2005 9:25:58 PM PST by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

I wasn't aware those were posted publically. Interesting.


167 posted on 01/21/2005 9:35:13 PM PST by Gondring (They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

they didn't like the poster in the shop windows.
< don't click if you are easily offended >
http://ad-rag.com/179.php


168 posted on 01/22/2005 1:20:43 AM PST by eccl1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

the Nazis thought the jewish books were more perverse and evil than pornography and the judges agreed with them.


169 posted on 01/22/2005 1:36:54 AM PST by eccl1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

I would rather not burn books.


170 posted on 01/22/2005 1:37:28 AM PST by eccl1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: dAnconia

not to mention the equivocaton of these islamists, to Nazarene Christians...


171 posted on 01/22/2005 2:00:44 AM PST by eccl1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
there's a substantial difference between banning religious speech and banning pornography, even light porn.

There is also a substantial difference between "banning" porn and the unlawful destruction of private property, as represented by the billboards and advertisements being destroyed.

I wonder if you recognize the difference?

172 posted on 01/22/2005 2:17:28 AM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Muslim Group Targets Poster Nudity

What, they don't want me posting in the nude now?

173 posted on 01/22/2005 2:31:19 AM PST by Ichneumon (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Sorry I don't think you can blame the spread of AIDS on scantily clad Women.



174 posted on 01/22/2005 2:37:06 AM PST by Selkie (You can argue 'til you're blue in the face, but I'll always be right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

once-great Britain

January 22 2005

Hostily-colonizing and sovereignty-subverting Muslim groups target poster nudity - By Nicola Woolcock


Effective terrorists are getting bolder in a campaign of vandalising adverts that display pictures of unclothed Human Beings


BILLBOARD adverts featuring partial nudity are being vandalized by muslims who effect being offended by facimiles of displays of flesh.

The advertising watchdog has confirmed that increasing numbers of posters are being torn down or painted over in "predominantly-islamic areas." [AKA: Colonies!]



A website giving advice on how to vandalise the private property of others [Billboards] and listing potential targets has been set up by a group calling themselves Muslims Against Advertising (MAAD).

The campaign has gathered momentum since the appeasers at the "advertising 'standards' authority" banned an underwear advert from being sited near mosques.

Advertisements for perfume, hair dye, bras and television programmes are among those that have been attacked.

Photographs of semi-dressed women are the most frequently targeted, with the "offending body parts" painted over or ripped off.

A poster advertising the Channel 4 programme Desperate Housewives is the most recent target; the images of two scantily-clad actresses have been torn from an East London billboard but three fully-dressed characters were left intact. Adverts bearing Dove’s “Real Women” adverts — six ordinary women pictured in their underwear — were painted over at several locations last year.

MAAD, based in Birmingham, gives an index of defaced adverts in the city, including Levi’s, Wonderbra, PaddyPower, a radio station and a strip club. It says on its destruction-of-private-property-inciting website that it believes in “direct action” and “has paint and isn’t afraid to use it”, adding: “There is no longer any need to cringe as you walk past a sleazy poster we’ve vadalized.”

Advice on how to attack posters is also given: “The procedures outlined here are based on our six months’ terroristic experience of executing poster attacks professionally, safely and without injury or arrest.

“A paint roller, a blithe spirit and a balmy night are all you really need.

“After choosing your board, be sure to inspect it both during the day and at night. Take note of all activities in the area. Who is about at 2am? How visible will you be?

“Bring a camera — it’s a good cover for doing anything you’re not supposed to. Check your escape routes.

“For work on larger boards we recommend walkie-talkies . . . the ground crew should monitor oncoming traffic and maintain radio contact with the lookout on the board.”

The ASA told Triumph to remove its advert for Sloggi thongs from a billboard near a mosque in Bury, after complaints and a petition.

One Muslim reportedly complained that it made his wife and daughters look so bloody ugly by comparison he and their brothers considered them “insulting” and to constitute “environmental pollution” -- and so had to honor kill them.

An advert for hair dye, which showed a woman peering into her bikini bottoms, was painted over by terroristic vandals in Luton. A spokesman said the poster would be “extremely offensive” to a Muslim man if he passed it on his way to a few bevvies and a stray bonk at the local.

Another Luton billboard for Marks & Spencer, showing the back of a naked woman, was also defaced.

And a poster in Bradford, featuring the tennis player Anna Kournikova modelling a sports bra, was covered with bodily fluids.

An "advertising 'standards' authority" spokesman said: “There does seem to be more criminal activity.

These acts of terroristic vandalism are criminal offences and private property is being defaced . . . it happens in a lot of "muslim areas" [Colonies] such as Luton, Bradford, Glasgow and Birmingham.

“We encourage terroristic-vandals to contact us and make their complaints known, then we can go through the proper channels in getting an advert taken down if it’s "offensive."

“One area we’re concerned about is causing "religious offence" — the use of religious imagery and also being sensitive to location. If something is offensive in a particular area then the company will normally take it down.

“We’re getting more and more complaints about the inappropriate location of adverts, outside schools or other places of terroristic indoctrination.”

A spokesman for the muslim council of Britain said the ASA’s code of practice made it clear that companies should be sensitive to the location of certain adverts.

He said: “We don’t condone posters being defaced and would always encourage wannabe terroristic vandals to raise their concerns with the asa, so that it is made aware of the strength of feeling. Defacing adverts is hooliganism.”

A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said: “Defacing a poster is a criminal offence but would be dealt with by us only if someone was caught in the act.”

ADVERTS ATTRACT NAKED DISLIKE


PlayStation 2 computer game, America’s 10 Most Wanted, showed a photo of Osama bin Laden next to the words “Go Get ‘Em”


Elida Faberge hair dye pictured a woman looking inside her bikini bottoms and the words: “Keeps hair colour so long you’ll forget your natural one”


Lastminute.com advert showed a photo of a woman’s breasts sprinkled with sand as she lay in dunes and the words “enjoy every lastminute.com”. Complaint upheld this week by asa. [ASS?]


Vodka poster depicting a semi-naked woman was sited near a Bolton mosque. Muslim leaders said the siting was “insensitive”


Publicity posters for the BBC television programme Babyfather, which showed four naked men standing under a shower with their backs to the camera, were daubed with red paint

[This piece "Touched up" by an editor [Terroristic-vandal?] offended by the original -- B A]


175 posted on 01/22/2005 2:48:07 AM PST by Brian Allen (I fly and can therefore be envious of no man -- Per Adua Ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dAnconia

Along with every other right, Muslim women are denied the right to be offended, so it's all about Muslim men...as usual.


176 posted on 01/22/2005 2:53:11 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

Isn't that special. One hopes France is paying attention to Muslim whacko hijinks in Britain because it's just a hop and a skip across the channel to the Louvre and France's national identity. (This was foretold a few months back by a Frenchman's editorial posted here on FR.) The slippery slope is in place, and soon those with means will pull up stakes and leave.


177 posted on 01/22/2005 2:59:29 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Here's one of the pictures referenced in the article that the murderous moonbats find so offensive that it moved them to vandalism.

The horror. The absolute horror.

178 posted on 01/22/2005 3:20:32 AM PST by Jack of all Trades (Still open to the view that Islam is not an insane murder cult, but it's an uphill battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #179 Removed by Moderator

To: quidnunc
Here's where this kind of behavior will lead


180 posted on 01/22/2005 3:40:49 AM PST by Jack of all Trades (Still open to the view that Islam is not an insane murder cult, but it's an uphill battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson