Posted on 01/26/2005 4:43:08 PM PST by scripter
Yet some freepers will tell us it's no big deal to show a video of popular cartoon characters about how "we are family" and at the same time teach from of a pro-homosexual teachers guide.
In addition to that, this video teaches children that even if someone makes them uncomfortable they are ok, it's ok to be different. It's putting children even more at risk of abuse, attempting to make them more trusting. After parents work so hard to teach them not to talk to strangers, etc etc.
Wrong. We are all born with the natural desire to eat food. It is inborn and normal. But some peolpe who suffer from mental disease choose to eat other things. It is natural and normal for all people to desire sexual relations with someone of the opposite sex (if they desire relations at all, some have abnormally low testosterone levels and are thusly eunichs in practice). Some people who have a mental disease called SAD desire to have different sexual relations (beastiality, necrophilia etc fall into this same category, mental illness)
Men and women are innately different.
Yes. Mentally healthy men desire women and mentally healthy women desire men.
I don’t refute that for many homosexuals it IS a choice. I also don’t refute that by creating an environment that embraces homosexuality we create homosexuals. Look at the man-hating culture that has been promoted for the past 30 years.
True 'homosexuals' are made, not born. (for all it is a choice)
Then look at the numbers, there are far more Lesbians than Gay men.
Apples and organges to a degree. While some lesbians result from the same causes as male SADs, some are openly lesbian simply becasue they hate men and once you eliminate men you're stuck with only women. In fact most lesbian activits openly state that they are that way because they choose to be that way
also have a friend Nathan who is gay. I’ve known Nathan since I was 5 and I swear to you that from the time we were younger he was always feminine. He never fit in with “the boys” preferring girls instead. Nathan didn’t come out until after high school (but we all knew he was gay).
Perfect case study. You all assumed he was SAD and probably treated him as such. Due to his not quite as masculine characteristics as others he likely suffered much teasing from his peers (self-fulfilling prophecy) and (from your later post) he had no relationship with his father.
Excellent candidate for recruitment. The last question is, When did he have his first SAD experience and how much older was the guy who molested him. I'll bet at least 11 yeasr older when Nathan was 14 or younger
Some people are just born GAY. Not all, not every gay individual, but I promise you that some people are just GAY.
No one is born with SAD. There is no genetic or hormonal component to the disease.
Forgot to address reply 83 to you, too -- sorry!
You have absolutely no proof of that other than your silly “intuition” I guess. Oh, and your irrefutable anecdotal evidence of Nathan the effeminate boy, of course if that were proof ALL effeminate boys grow up to be “gay” right? But then your “sometimes” it’s a choice claptrap comes into effect? I’m confused.
I gave you a link to what happens when androgen production is in imbalance. John O correctly pointed out that you can’t measure hormone levels of a corpse to determine if it were homosexual or not. Yet you hang on to the notion that homosexuality is induced by hormones OR chemicals? (What chemicals would those be?) And as usual, you perversion justificators usually have a “friend” who is gay and that’s enough to defend his honor with the usual proof “the earth is flat”.
BTW, we're all born heterosexual...paraphilic disorder is what changes that. To say some people are born with paraphilic disorder is to say some people are born attracted to animals. You've lost your mind.
At first I thought the headline said "Curricula may influence brain masturbation in teens"
After reading the article, maybe that's what it should have said.
I agree that homosexuality is curable. For some homosexual individuals there must be some sort of chemical/hormonal imbalance.
Maybe you should go back and read the article again. This is explained very thoroughly.
It should also be at THEIR expense and employers or taxpayers shouldn't have to PAY for that choice (which we do.)
interesting. ping worthy?
Public schools ping
that would be "mandatory OPT IN"
I do not believe that. I believe depression is a learned response also to the environment....granted, diet, lack of minerals, vitamins have more of an effect but getting depressed about things IS normal, BUT one has to learn how to deal with the situations in a way where they don't dwell on it for days, etc.
Agreed. I shouldn't have to pay for someone ele's decadent lifestyle.
We are trying to pass "mandatory opt In" in the legislature. This means a parent would have to opt in via a permission slip, or the child cannot attend. This would be much more effective, and harder for GLSEN to get around.
Indeed opt-in would be best. But the foes of opt-in are legion - GLSEN, the NEA, and as you mention, the ACLU are just a few examples.
The ACLU is pushing this on the schools, even filing lawsuits if schools don't enforce GLSEN's teaching to ALL students.
The NEA's and ACLU's homosexual caucuses are staunch supporters of GLSEN, and the NEA even awarded Mr Jennings the NEA's human rights "creative leadership" award ( documented here ).
It's all part of the ruse.
Thanks: Check this out too...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1329982/posts
BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.