Gay-Affirmative Public School Teachers/Curricula May Influence Brain Maturation In Teens

Narth ^

[nicmarlo]

I glanced at this earlier.....I don't know if you pinged me...or I just looked, lol

[nicmarlo]

bookmarked...this would be a keeper

[nicmarlo]

Hey Ed

[EdReform]

huh?

[nicmarlo]

I've been noticing more and more "removals" by a certain website....I've spent most of this evening and much of last looking for info....more and more has disappeared...even from the wayback now...have you heard about/noticed this?

[EdReform]

No, I haven't had time to check - been busy archiving.

[John O]

So, being gay isn't genetic, its indoctrination?

The First Law of Homosexuality:

'Homosexuals' don't reproduce, they recruit

[John O]

The Third Law of Homosexuality:

Any exposure of children to homosexual behavior is child abuse

[longtermmemmory]

big brother leftist is busy rewriting history.

[nicmarlo]

busy rewriting history

indeed, they are.

[John O]

Some people are born with homosexual tendencies. For others it is a choice.

No one is born with tendencies to commit homosexuality. Every 'gay gene' study that has 'found' a genetic link has been debunked. There is no way to tell a corpse was a 'homosexual'

'Homosexuality' more correctly known as Same-sex Attraction Disorder (SAD) is a mental disease. It is curable.

Everyone is born heterosexual, look at biology for a confirmation of this. Man fits together with woman perfectly and productively. No other arrangement works

[odoso]

""So, being gay isn't genetic, its indoctrination?""

It always has been...

[EdReform]

Bump

[EdReform]

Bump & Ping

[Eva]

There was a post a couple of weeks ago about a study that indicated that nearly fify percent (can't remember the exact figure) of all homosexuals admitted to having been sexually molested by an adult male before the age of fourteen and that the average age difference was eleven years. That pretty much says that in a large percent of the cases, homosexuality is learned.

[Grampa Dave]

It is time that we start bringing up two valid points everytime the Gay Activists try to push their Homosexual agenda:

1. The gay life style kills more people everyday. It is the true quagmire of American and the world. The Gay lifestyle is far more dangerous to Americans than the Iraqi situation.

2. The cost of the gay life style is very high re medical treatment. It is a total waste of money until the infected ones die. During the wasteful/expensive Medical treatment time, they continue to have sex and infect others.
http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p=Homosexuals%20should%20pay%20more%20insurance


Homosexuals Should Pay More Insurance

January 20, 2005

---

by Nathan Tabor

---

With the big flap over so-called “gay marriage” temporarily on the back burner — now that their fearless but feckless leader John Kerry has gone down in flames, and with the first government-sanctioned same-sex unions already ending nastily in divorce courts and bitter custody battles — this just might be an opportune moment to discuss some rarely mentioned health problems inherent within the allegedly avant garde homosexual lifestyle.

Some would say it is a known fact that most homosexuals, and especially gay men, are promiscuous. Their rhetoric is carefully crafted to give the impression they are in “committed, caring relationships” while research suggests that the vast majority of gays are neither celibate nor monogamous. (All heterosexuals are not celibate or monogamous either.)

Some may say, so what? Well, the corollary to this homosexual health hypothesis is another proven fact: most sexually active homosexuals simply don’t live a very long time. The heartier they party, it seems, the shorter the time that party lasts.

According to a article entitled “ The Longevity of Homosexuals” in the Omega Journal of Death and Dying, the median age of death from AIDS for homosexual men is 37, and the median age of death from other causes is 42. This does not compare favorably to the ever-increasing average lifespan of the rest of the heterosexual American population.

An analysis conducted at the end of 1997 by the Centers for Disease Control revealed that fully 60 percent of all AIDS cases in the United States are found among homosexual men. This is an amazingly high figure, especially when we consider that homosexuals — contrary to Kinsey's flawed study and fabricated “one-in-ten” myth — constitute only about 1 to 2 percent of our total population.

The conclusion is simple. Homosexual activists say they want equal rights and treatment. Fine. Let’s use their own arguments against them here. Let’s start by having them pay their fair share of the healthcare costs that accompany their lifestyle.

Long-term medical treatment for HIV and AIDS is usually protracted and tremendously expensive. Maybe that’s why gay activists are pushing so hard for spousal benefits for domestic partners of homosexuals — so somebody else, like the government or an employer, will pick up the tab.

“Risky” behavior is called risky for a reason. It means that by doing it, you put your life in danger. It’s really a lot like gambling for high stakes. The more you play, the more you stand to lose. For indulging in this risky behavior, you rightfully SHOULD pay more for both life and health insurance.

This isn’t a religious or even a moral values argument. This is strictly a common sense fiscal argument. You play risky, you pay more. That’s only fair. In fact, if these types of policies aren’t implemented, then health-conscious people are the ones being discriminated against.

You can’t blame the insurance companies for charging more. After all, their likelihood of having to pay out large sums of money on behalf of their gay clients is significantly greater.

Drinking and smoking, for example, are all directly related to dozens of diseases and medical conditions. So insurance companies habitually charge higher premiums. But non-smokers, non-drinkers and those who exercise get better rates than those who don’t practice such healthy lifestyle choices.

What about skydivers, hang gliders, and racecar drivers — do they pay the same life insurance premiums as those who watch birds or collect stamps? Not hardly.

The same logic should be applied to practicing homosexuals. When actuaries and insurance underwriters finally figure out this formula, we may see some instantaneous lifestyle changes.

After all, their risky homosexual behavior is a lifestyle choice, not a destiny. If the proven threat to their health won’t do the trick, maybe the cost to their pocketbooks will.

Nathan Tabor

Copyright © 2005 by Nathan Tabor

[EdReform]

Perhaps the biggest 'cost' of the homosexual life style is the damage done to the souls of the children being indoctrinated.

I agree with your points.

[little jeremiah]

Pinging you all to this article - post #56 - an excellent piece about homosexuals, longevity, AIDS, and the cost of insurance. Not a bit of 'morality' or 'religion' in it.

Just numbers, that anyone will see and agree with. Unless, of course, they're likely to contract AIDS by their behavior.

Let me and DirtyHarryY2K know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.

[EdReform]

Hi madg

[EdReform]

Ping