Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug War Shrinking Bill of Rights
Fox News Network ^ | Jan. 27, 2005 | Radley Balko

Posted on 01/27/2005 3:40:30 PM PST by Wolfie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: thoughtomator

TIA lives on, in various commercial versions and in successor projects. The name was changed. The project is still there. Cisco has a handy page listing some of the neat tools Big Brother uses on you:

http://www.cisco.com/wwl/regaffairs/lawful_intercept/


21 posted on 01/27/2005 4:21:14 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bullseye876
Reality dictates that, for domestic security, we roll up as many smugglers and dealers as possible and incarcerate them.

Reality is that the Drug War creates the drug gangs, just like Prohibition created The Mob. I grew up two towns over from where Capone ruled, and next door to Sam Giancana. The Drug War will give us the next generation of these fine citizens, plus an army of bent cops and pols.

22 posted on 01/27/2005 4:23:59 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
I will never understand why conservatives support federal anti-drug laws.

There's an important subset of 'conservatives' who feel powerless and want to identify with a government that "kicks ass and takes names".

23 posted on 01/27/2005 4:24:41 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bullseye876
1. The WOD was elevated to cabinet level priority in 1989. Has there been any success in curbing supply, demand, or profits to drug traffickers?

2. Which Clause delegates to Congress the power to dictate intrastate drug policies?

24 posted on 01/27/2005 4:25:35 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
several state legislatures have also now considered bills that would mandate ignition interlock devices in every car sold in the state. New Mexico's version of the law would require all drivers to blow into a tube before starting their car, then again every ten minutes while driving. Drivers over the legal limit would not be able to start their cars or, if already on the road, given a window of time to pull over. Onboard computer systems would keep data on each test, which service centers would download once a month or so and send to law enforcement officials for evaluation.

(above excerpt from full article)

This is spine chilling! Even Huxley couldn't have dreamed this up!

I'm gonna get a donkey...

25 posted on 01/27/2005 4:25:40 PM PST by maine-iac7 (...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jammer
Just who's bigger and better armed.

And don't you forget it. :0

26 posted on 01/27/2005 4:27:21 PM PST by verity (The Liberal Media is America's Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Maceman
I will never understand why conservatives support federal anti-drug laws.

Count me out. The federal government has done lots of stupid and awful things but way up at the top are the WOD and the establishment of the Department of Education.

28 posted on 01/27/2005 4:28:23 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eno_

That link implies that there are NO products which use this protocol. Is there something actually in existence that qualifies?


29 posted on 01/27/2005 4:31:39 PM PST by thoughtomator (How do you say Berkeley California in Aramaic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: bullseye876

US society, before we instituted the WoD. None of the rampant drug problems we have now.


31 posted on 01/27/2005 4:32:57 PM PST by thoughtomator (How do you say Berkeley California in Aramaic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: Bean Counter
You won't like his answer, but I would love to be around to watch you ask.

He would have been better off putting his investment money into a probation management business. Those things are gold mines, and unlike credit card companies, they can put one in jail for falling behind on payments. (of course, he will get out fairly quickly; got more fines to pay, ya know!)

33 posted on 01/27/2005 4:35:16 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bullseye876

Why is that?


34 posted on 01/27/2005 4:36:19 PM PST by thoughtomator (How do you say Berkeley California in Aramaic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bullseye876
One of the primary duties of the federal government is to protect the citizens by protecting the borders from unwanted people, animals and things including certain drugs.

"One of these things is not like the other, one of these things just doesn't belong..."

35 posted on 01/27/2005 4:36:58 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bullseye876

Smoking cafes exist all over the Netherlands. I used to commute to Amsterdam for a consulting gig. A pleasant stop on the way to the airport for the flight home. I dare say "air rage" would be rare if passengers roasted a bone instead of tanking up on booze. Pot is the vast majority of illegal drug use, and the rest will make no statistical significant impact on society, if legalized.

The model is Prohibition. We had to get rid of it. SO it will be with the Drug War. Spit on a narc's familiy member if you value freedom. These people are the enemy.

90% of addiction and mortality and morbidity due to drug use is due to alcohol. There is a good case to be made that if pot displaced some alcohol use, there would be fewer prob
lems with addiction in society.


36 posted on 01/27/2005 4:37:03 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

What protocol are you referring to?

I am very familiar with telecom infrastructure LI protocols.


37 posted on 01/27/2005 4:39:04 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Welcome to the PoliceState, Wolfie.

Be prepared to show your papers, and be strip-searched, at any given moment.


38 posted on 01/27/2005 4:41:47 PM PST by lodwick (Integrity has no need of rules. Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonestown

Perhaps the greatest perversion of Supreme Court logic is in the Earls case, in which Thomas declares that high school students must be treated as a class of people, not as individuals.


39 posted on 01/27/2005 4:47:36 PM PST by Ed_in_NJ (Who killed Suzanne Coleman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson