Skip to comments.
"Starving" Education on the 'All You Can Eat' Plan (California)
McClintock Website ^
| January 25
| Tom McClintock
Posted on 01/27/2005 9:34:25 PM PST by AVNevis
State schools superintendent Jack O'Connell this week called for massive tax increases for the public school bureaucracy while issuing a blunt warning to Gov. Schwarzenegger: "Stop starving our schools." Here's how the governor is "starving our schools." According to the Legislative Analyst's Office, the governor's proposed budget provides $9,508 for every pupil in the California public schools. That's $206 per pupil more than last year. That means every classroom of 30 students will receive $6,180 more next year than it did this year - or a total of $285,240 per classroom.
In fact, over the past ten years, total funding for K-12 education has grown 88.4 percent from $32.058 billion in 1995-96 to $60.401 billion as proposed next year. Meanwhile, per pupil funding has grown 59.2 percent from $5,972 in 1995-96 to $9,508. In the same period, the federal CPI has grown 24 percent and the state CPI has grown 25 percent.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: budget; calbudget; caleducation; california; mcclintock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Some great analysis on how Governor Schwarzennegger isn't starving education of it's funding.
1
posted on
01/27/2005 9:34:26 PM PST
by
AVNevis
To: calcowgirl; FairOpinion; Eric Hogue 1380 KTKZ; ElkGroveDan
McClintock PING!
BTW, would anyone have an interest in a formal McClintock PING list?
2
posted on
01/27/2005 9:35:41 PM PST
by
AVNevis
(You are never too young to stand up for America)
To: AVNevis
Sure. This is one guy who actually offers up substance in whatever he says, whether one agrees on not. In short, the guy has gravitas.
3
posted on
01/27/2005 9:39:01 PM PST
by
Torie
To: AVNevis
$9,508 per pupil?
That's considerably more than it costs for a quality private education here.
Actually, it's WAY more.
4
posted on
01/27/2005 9:40:02 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Torie
"This is one guy who actually offers up substance in whatever he says, whether one agrees on not. In short, the guy has gravitas."
Agreed. He is the person that I aspire to be.
5
posted on
01/27/2005 9:40:32 PM PST
by
AVNevis
(You are never too young to stand up for America)
To: bill1952
"$9,508 per pupil?
That's considerably more than it costs for a quality private education here.
Actually, it's WAY more."
I can tell you from personal experience that most of that money never gets within a mile of the classroom.
6
posted on
01/27/2005 9:43:07 PM PST
by
AVNevis
(You are never too young to stand up for America)
To: AVNevis
or a total of $285,240 per classroom
If that is starving, I'd hate to see what bloated is...
7
posted on
01/27/2005 9:44:33 PM PST
by
swilhelm73
(Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
To: AVNevis
On Long Island, it is more like 14K per pupil. California has it cheap.
8
posted on
01/27/2005 9:45:28 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
"On Long Island, it is more like 14K per pupil. California has it cheap."
Actually they are probably about equal when you factor in cost of living.
9
posted on
01/27/2005 9:46:52 PM PST
by
AVNevis
(You are never too young to stand up for America)
To: AVNevis
I thought Arnold cut spending.
To: AVNevis
Nope. Government employees are just very well compensated in those reaches. California beleive it or not is not a cheap place to live. It ain't Arkansas.
11
posted on
01/27/2005 9:52:17 PM PST
by
Torie
To: econ_grad
"I thought Arnold cut spending."
Common misconception. His budget for next years increases spending by 7 Billion dollars. He is merely slowing the rate of spending growth.
12
posted on
01/27/2005 9:52:21 PM PST
by
AVNevis
(You are never too young to stand up for America)
To: AVNevis
Oh, I know!
I think that is well past time to take control of our schools back from the NEA and other socialist groups that have more or less ruined our educational quality and replaced it with a political agenda.
13
posted on
01/27/2005 9:52:31 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: AVNevis
That is all that takes to please rank and file Republicans.
To: Torie
Have your priced housing in SF, LA or San Diego lately? A modest home is 600,000.
To: AVNevis
State schools superintendent Jack O'Connell this week called for massive tax increases And that's okay with the good voters there??
16
posted on
01/27/2005 10:05:36 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
And the taxes on that modest home would be?
17
posted on
01/27/2005 10:06:34 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
Well I actually own property in LA, Orange and Riverside Counties, so I have some vague familiarity with the market.
18
posted on
01/27/2005 10:06:34 PM PST
by
Torie
To: bill1952
About 1.1% of orginal purchase price plus 2% per year increase thereafter typically.
19
posted on
01/27/2005 10:07:50 PM PST
by
Torie
To: bill1952
"And that's okay with the good voters there??"
Nope. That's why the recall was started. However the Democrats learned nothing from it and continue calling for raised taxes.
20
posted on
01/27/2005 10:12:16 PM PST
by
AVNevis
(You are never too young to stand up for America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson