Skip to comments.
Local rancher awarded $600,000 in battle with green group (SW AZ)
NogalesInternational.com ^
| Jan. 27, 2005
| George C. McQueen
Posted on 01/30/2005 1:05:20 PM PST by madfly
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
A federal district court "ruled the FWS could not obtain 'regulatory jurisdiction' unless the species, in fact, existed. Re-reading your comments, and then the article, I came across this gem:
and Sonoran chub, a small fish endemic to the Sonoran Desert.
Speaking as a lay person, this smells like a fish tale to me.
I mean, really. Fish? In a desert? /grin
Cheers!
21
posted on
01/30/2005 4:35:47 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: madfly
To: madfly
Way to go!
Score one for the good guys & Gals
23
posted on
01/30/2005 5:39:26 PM PST
by
utahguy
(Ya gotta kill it before you grill it: Ted Nugent)
To: madfly
'Cattle have been grazing on the Montana Allotment for 300 years.'
Hmmm? 300 years? 1705-2005? That quite a long time? Cattle has been grazing there since 1705? I wonder if the rancher is not doing some misleading himself?
24
posted on
01/30/2005 6:05:10 PM PST
by
rawhide
To: madfly
This is *exactly* the way to disarm these yammering leftists: Make them pay to yammer.
One of the old guys in my gun club, years ago, was constantly agitating for gun owners' organizations to start *suing* the media and anyone else who defamed us. After initially thinking he was just litigation-crazy, I started realizing where he was headed.
25
posted on
01/30/2005 7:01:00 PM PST
by
fire_eye
(Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
To: rawhide
He didn't say that his cattle had been there for 300 years. The spanish first settled that area around 1630.
26
posted on
01/30/2005 7:39:59 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
To: Emmett McCarthy
"Now, the question is: will he be able to collect it?" He's been fighting this for almost 5 years; do you think he lacks the tenacity? The enviro-nazi group has deep pockets (mostly filled by tax dollars)
27
posted on
01/30/2005 7:46:31 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
To: tertiary01
"They sued the Forest Service!! and will be entitled to reimbursement." No, in fact, if the feds are sharp they will get reimbursement from the watermellons for filing a false case.
28
posted on
01/30/2005 7:50:33 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
To: Emmett McCarthy
"Now, the question is: will he be able to collect it?" Standard M.O. for these groups is to close up shop and reopen under a new name. They do this for lots of reasons including avoiding the law. I would not be surprised if the same happens here.
29
posted on
01/30/2005 7:56:38 PM PST
by
Mad Dawgg
(French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
To: editor-surveyor
Rush was just talking about this last week. He maintained that the reason there are so many environmental groups suing the government over various environmental issues is due to the fact that they are entitled reimbursement for the costs of the lawsuits, win or lose.
This evidently was written into the Title that authorizes the EPA thus making it a virtual lawyer employment act and leading to the out-of-control proliferation of environmental activist groups.
To: farmfriend
31
posted on
01/31/2005 3:03:39 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson