Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(WA) Bill prohibiting the use of union dues without permission introduced in Senate
Evergreen Freedom Foundation ^ | 2-7-05 | Mike Reitz

Posted on 02/07/2005 2:13:52 PM PST by truth49

OLYMPIA—A bill has been introduced in the Senate that would require labor organizations to account for the use of dues and inform members of the bargaining unit when dues are to be spent for political purposes. Senate Bill 5571 is sponsored by Senators Hewitt, Honeyford, McCaslin, Delvin and Mulliken.

The bill amends RCW 42.17.680(3) and adds a new section to chapter 42.17 of the RCW.

Among its provisions, Senate Bill 5571:

prohibits labor organizations from deducting dues from an employee’s paycheck for political purposes without the written request of the employee; requires public sector unions that collect “representation fees” from non-union employees pursuant to a union security clause to segregate these funds. Agency fees may be expended for the purposes of collective bargaining, but cannot be spent for political purposes without the prior authorization of the employee; requires public sector unions to maintain a separate deposit account for any political expenditures, keep itemized reports of all income and expenditures, and annually file reports with the Public Disclosure Commission; requires unions to notify bargaining unit employees of the intended use of funds within the deposit accounts; and provides a private right of action for any employee whose funds were deducted in violation of the law: recovery of three times the amount deducted or $1,000, whichever is greater, as well as costs and attorney’s fees. “Senate Bill 5711 would require unions to be accountable to the members they represent,” said Michael Reitz, project director for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. “Employees forced to pay union dues as a condition of employment have a right to know how their money is used. No one should be forced to pay for someone else’s political views in order to keep their job.”

Additional Information Senate Bill 5711


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: dues; eff; elections; themostcorruptstate; unions

1 posted on 02/07/2005 2:13:52 PM PST by truth49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truth49

Sweeeeeeeet.... but it won't go anywhere.....


2 posted on 02/07/2005 2:14:31 PM PST by Drango (tag line under repair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

I noticed in the January issue of the union magazine that members can "opt" out and have the portion of their dues that would be used for political purposes returned to them.


3 posted on 02/07/2005 2:20:12 PM PST by buckeye4bush (buckeye4bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

This would be a great bill, but unfortunately it will go over like a fart in church.


4 posted on 02/07/2005 2:23:15 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49
How about a bill that would ban unions?


5 posted on 02/07/2005 2:25:23 PM PST by rdb3 (The wife asked how I slept last night. I said, "How do I know? I was asleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49
This bill would be a start but I agree that it probably won't go anywhere. What really has to happen is for the Unions to get out of campaign finance business altogether as regards the use of Union dues.

These Unions, like any other entity, have the ability to form PACs or other nonprofit political vehicles to which their membership can voluntarily give, if they are so inclined.

I have to think that deducting of a 'Fee' from a Member's wages, a fee that is required as a condition of employment in a Union Shop, and using a portion of that fee for non-Union purposes has got to be something that could be challenged on any number of legal theories.

6 posted on 02/07/2005 2:43:25 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

Didn't the Hatch Amendment already address this?


7 posted on 02/07/2005 4:53:10 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson