Skip to comments.
(Ward) Churchill Plans To Speak, No Matter What
News 4 ^
| 2/8/05
| CBS 4 Denver
Posted on 02/08/2005 12:19:11 PM PST by NorCoGOP
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
02/08/2005 12:19:11 PM PST
by
NorCoGOP
To: NorCoGOP
>>>>>>>"They can run security for 40,000 drunken students at a football game," Lane said. "They can run security when Salman Rushdie speaks, they can run security event after event, controversial speaker after controversial speaker, [then] they can run security for Ward Churchill.
They just don't want to run security for Ward Churchill. He's an insignificant jerk who's not worth the expenditure.
2
posted on
02/08/2005 12:21:25 PM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(The Khmer Rouge never captured anybody's doll. - Jonah Goldberg)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: .cnI redruM
4
posted on
02/08/2005 12:25:22 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
To: NorCoGOP
To: UnionCountyYoungRepublican
Pardon my ignorance but what is a JABRONI?
6
posted on
02/08/2005 12:27:41 PM PST
by
drt1
To: drt1
I think it is the machine that smooths the ice out at a hockey rink.
7
posted on
02/08/2005 12:30:05 PM PST
by
mlbford2
("Never wrestle with a pig; you can't win, you just get filthy, and the pig loves it...")
To: wogworld
The only people that will come to his freak show will be a few low life hippie students and a couple of scum bag liberal news media types. But wait until you see the MSM coverage tomorrow! It'll be played like the Second Coming.
8
posted on
02/08/2005 12:30:43 PM PST
by
Bernard Marx
(Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
To: mlbford2
No that's a Zamboni (Sp?)
9
posted on
02/08/2005 12:30:54 PM PST
by
drt1
To: NorCoGOP
Let him speak, as far as I'm concerned, he may as well be sHhrillary's running mate in '08!
10
posted on
02/08/2005 12:32:04 PM PST
by
RushCrush
(If it takes a bloodbath, let's get it over with. No more appeasement. - Reagan)
To: NorCoGOP
"They can run security for 40,000 drunken students at a football game," Lane said. "They can run security when Salman Rushdie speaks, they can run security event after event, controversial speaker after controversial speaker, [then] they can run security for Ward Churchill. People want to see the football game and are willing to pay to do so. Does this prof think he has the right to a university-sponsored venue to spout his hate speech? Is that what his rights are under the First Amendment? The jerk-off shoud read the Constitution - if he knows how to read!
11
posted on
02/08/2005 12:34:12 PM PST
by
Rummyfan
I am always for letting these idiots have their say. The more they open their mouths, the more irrelevant they become. The majority of Americans (and the number is growing) see what the President has accomplished. They see freedom in Afghanistan, Iraq, possibly Palestine, Ukraine and see that the Bush Doctrine is working. The media can't hide, or excuse, these idiots any longer. Let 'em speak!
12
posted on
02/08/2005 12:37:13 PM PST
by
Rocket1968
(No more Daschle - No more Daschle)
To: NorCoGOP
free speech lets us see the idiots coming and that way
we can get out of the infected area.
13
posted on
02/08/2005 12:44:44 PM PST
by
Rakkasan1
(john f'n kerry-the original 'million dollar baby'.)
To: Rocket1968
"The more they open their mouths, the more irrelevant they become."
I agree. We need a word for those who fall into this category. Let's call them the "Irrelevantsia".
14
posted on
02/08/2005 12:46:49 PM PST
by
Buck W.
(How can anyone who works for a living vote democrat?)
To: NorCoGOP
15
posted on
02/08/2005 12:47:13 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
To: NorCoGOP
Officials with the university sited security concernssited?
16
posted on
02/08/2005 12:50:33 PM PST
by
SmithL
(Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?)
To: NorCoGOP
would dearly LOVE to see and hear him speak in the same fashion that Thomas Paine spoke in those days after he published his blasphemous Age of Reason. Would love the
smell of hot tar and chicken feathers,and the sound of a few
well placed fists punctuating the sentiments of those Americans who do NOT agree that the US ought be "out of existance altogether." Those Americans who do not believe we need more 9-11 type attacks.But such dreams are of days that cannot return .My people are destroyed for lack of understanding.
To: RushCrush
Let him speak, as far as I'm concerned, he may as well be sHhrillary's running mate in '08! I agree, I love that this problem with academia is finally getting uncovered.
Imagine how many parents send their children off to college for the first time for that family. Having never been to university themselves, when little Buffy or Jodi come home spouting off all this"elightenment" they pick up. Mom and Dad are, and probably have been, in the past, intimidated. They don't know where this is coming from and they probably do start to question their ability to "think critically".
Now, Mom and Dad are catching on. Some, not all. But it is a good thing, a light is being shone on these vermin. If we can take down academia--we win the war.
18
posted on
02/08/2005 12:53:26 PM PST
by
riri
To: Buck W.
We need a word for those who fall into this category. Let's call them the "Irrelevantsia".
That's a good word. I'll be using that one from now on.
19
posted on
02/08/2005 12:53:55 PM PST
by
wolfpat
(Dum vivimus, vivamus)
To: NorCoGOP
He can certainly speak, but I don't have to listen to his bilge.
20
posted on
02/08/2005 12:55:07 PM PST
by
mhking
(Do not mess with dragons, for thou art crunchy & good with ketchup...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson