Teresa wouldn't let a dirty terrorist touch the upholstery...
Posted on 02/08/2005 10:48:57 PM PST by ainitfunny
That thought was running through my head as well...
Frankly, I just don't give a damn, what happens to these sonovabitches.........as long as it's nothing good.
I'd like to know why Coleman retired and whether he was pushed into retirement because of his own marginal competence in counter-terrorism. He could be an incompetence Clinton appointee who thought the FBI was a country club.
Post #123 should read "He could be an incompetent Clinton appointee..."
I hope you're right about clandestine activities occurring about which we know nothing. The thought also occurs to me that if we torture them, then kill them and bury them, that would solve the problem. Dead men tell no tales.
I actually guffawed, loudly, when I read your post.
Teresa wouldn't let a dirty terrorist touch the upholstery...
I'm not sure, but I thought O'R had her on because it was on the way to a vote.
We need to be contacting our congressfolk to scuttle this one NOW.
Hey!
How are you, pharmamom?
What do you guys have?
(I'm still catching up)
So tell me"Ain't".
Can you source where it says innocents are being dissapeared by us?
I suppose you'd like it if the Marines stopped and Mirandized the terrorists as they picked them up...
Bill O's guest was Congresswoman Jane Harman, House Intelligence Committee, from California. If I can find the transcript of the show somewhere I will post the data to you on this thread.
Yes, this seems like a case of "someone who doesn't like us said it, so it must be true." And, aint's cap lock key appears to be broken.
You better take a chill pill pal.
Then you can tell your story walkin'. Because I don't buy your BS!
"I suppose it never crossed the writer's mind that this administration is less interested in bringing terrorists before a judge than it is in GETTING THE REQUISITE INFO for finding as many of them as we can, and KILLING THEM."
You get it, the writer of this piece doesn't. We are not rounding up these beings in order to reduce crime. We are rounding them up, because this is WAR.
"Your faulty reasoning is that the more heinous and outrageous the crime that is committed,"
Here is your first mistake. THIS IS NOT ABOUT CRIME, IT IS WAR.
It's very effective and does no permanent damage.
"Humane" torture?
The "no torture" bill going through congress needs to be killed immediately. I personally don't care how we extract information from these terrorist thugs and murderers as long as we are getting results.
"</sick-twisted-humor-that-popped-into-my-head-and-probably-shouldn't-be-posted-on-a-public-forum disclaimer ..."
All I can say is that I got a good chuckle out of it.
"What is being reported is NOT BATTLEFIELD related captures but the kidnapping of citizens off the street IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES ALL OVER THE WORLD. People who may have the same name as some "wanted" suspect or simply have a name that some tortured individual gave his torturer to stop the abuse. They are literally kidnapped on their way to work or shopping etc. and then spirited off to be tortured in another nation without any intervening legal niceties to inquire if they are even the person who was being sought. Like the Salem witchhunters, mere accusal is sufficient."
No that is not who is being captured. Those who are being captured are either: 1. shooting at our guys, or 2. we have much evidence that they are who we are hunting for. Notice that we have captured thousands during this war and only 150 have been sent off to other nations. Also, they are not being captured in their own country, it is their own country that they are being returned to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.