[ainitfunny]

You have become not only fools, but UNAMERICAN fools.

Your faulty reasoning is that the more heinous and outrageous the crime that is committed, the LESS EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO START EXACTING REVENGE UPON SOMEONE, UNTIL YOU ARRIVE AT THE POSITION YOU NOW HOLD THAT MERE ACCUSAL OF A TERRIBLE DEPRAVITY IS SUFFICIENT IN AN OF ITSELF TO EXACT UNLIMITED REVENGE UPON THE ONE ACCUSED.

That kind of thinking led to the "REIGN OF TERROR" and eventually bit Robespierre (it's author)in the butt.(or should I say head?) Grab a history book and get an education about what and where that kind of sentiment leads.

[MindBender26]

Try the Decaf.

[Max Combined]

"the more heinous and outrageous the crime that is committed, the LESS EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO START EXACTING REVENGE UPON SOMEONE"

No, it is you who are the fool and you lack reading comprehension skills. This is not about exacting revenge, it is about extracting intelligence information so that terrorists attacks can be prevented and innocent lives can be saved.

[metesky]

You've been trolling for a long time and it ain't funny.

[piasa]

A. This has nothing to do with revenge.

B. Robespierre attacked his fellow Frenchmen- you're comparing apples to string beans.

C. Robespieere's country was not under attack by foreign Islamofascists. D. Robespierre did not deport invading noncitizens back to their home countries WHERE THEY WOULD HAVE BELONGED, he was putting his fellow Frenchmen under the guillotine in order to remove their little heads. Get a grip.

E. Robespierre did not find his victims in corresponding about and in possession of information about poisoning water supplies, making bombs, etc. He did not find them in possession of materials designed to kill as many people as possible. He did not find them trading videos of people they had decapitated, they were not loudly confessing their intent to slaughter all infidels or proclaiming their loyalty to a religious extremist mass murderer, and so on.

F. If you're comparing the US to France you really do need to take your own advice and spend more time with your head immersed in a history book.

[SpinyNorman]

Your faulty reasoning is that the more heinous and outrageous the crime that is committed, the LESS EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO START EXACTING REVENGE UPON SOMEONE, UNTIL YOU ARRIVE AT THE POSITION YOU NOW HOLD THAT MERE ACCUSAL OF A TERRIBLE DEPRAVITY IS SUFFICIENT IN AN OF ITSELF TO EXACT UNLIMITED REVENGE UPON THE ONE ACCUSED.

Sounds like the definition of "jihad", don't you think?

[adam_az]

I think it be a troll.

[Lady Heron]

While I agree with you if these were American citizens, part of me screams these are not Americans, they are here as enemy combatants sans country, and the dems want us to use the courts against them. Basically they want our hands tied when they should be questioned if they could be if not they should be taken out(yes killed). This is war, and they are here to disrupt and kill Americans.

What happened to spies or saboteurs in every other war? And since they are here without the backing of a country just a religion, even those rules do not apply. We are dealing with a totally new type of combatant, perhaps they should have signed on to the Geneva Convention before starting this war, though no islamic country ever keeps that promise, but at least we would have.

While it is a very dangerous precedent, it is one bound by certain rules, come here to destroy us because of your religion not your country, Geneva does not apply. They knew that coming here, they just thought we were wimps, they know it now if they come.

[mjaneangels@aolcom]

"Your faulty reasoning is that the more heinous and outrageous the crime that is committed,"

Here is your first mistake. THIS IS NOT ABOUT CRIME, IT IS WAR.

[dennisw]

Stifle yourself junior.