Skip to comments.
Congresswoman Calls on Special Prosecutor to Investigate Gannon's Role in Plame Leak
Office of Louise Slaughter
| Feb. 11, 2005
| Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-NY
Posted on 02/11/2005 10:30:42 AM PST by seamus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
The attacks on Jeff Gannon continue. What evidence does Rep. Slaughter present to even suggest Gannon had anything to do with the Plame leak? I thought it was leaked to Bob Novak.
It's pretty scary when a journalist, or blogger, or any private citizen can prompt members of Congress to call for a criminal investigation just for being pro-Bush.
1
posted on
02/11/2005 10:30:43 AM PST
by
seamus
To: seamus
2
posted on
02/11/2005 10:33:29 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
To: Lazamataz
PING!!!
This goes along with your earlier thread.
To: seamus
Rep. Slaughter, a long-time advocate for media reform and accountability The amazing thing is that people are able to right this kind of stuff without laughing themselves to death.
To: Lazamataz; Miss Marple
They are going to try and tie the Plame/Wilson leak to FR....you just watch.
5
posted on
02/11/2005 10:36:43 AM PST
by
Dog
To: seamus; All
To: seamus
"And just who let Hillary have 900 FBI files?" she was later heard to ask?
(HA!)
7
posted on
02/11/2005 10:38:50 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(this space for rent)
To: vbmoneyspender
oops - right = write. I hope Rep. Slaughter's online accountability brigade doesn't charge me with felonious mispelling of a homonym.
To: seamus
I am Joseph Steffen, and I approved this message.
Joseph Steffen aka ncpac
PO BOX 177 B
Baltimore,MD, 21235
(410) 933-8511
9
posted on
02/11/2005 10:39:17 AM PST
by
G.Mason
(The replies by this poster are meant for self amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
To: Dog
They are going to try and tie the Plame/Wilson leak to FR....you just watch.It's a damned shame that O'MALLEY CHEATS ON HIS WIFE!!!!
10
posted on
02/11/2005 10:45:55 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
To: seamus
It's pretty scary when a journalist, or blogger, or any private citizen can prompt members of Congress to call for a criminal investigation just for being pro-Bush.Scary, but not surprising....
11
posted on
02/11/2005 10:47:15 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: seamus
This really is a 'non-event' which the lame democrats will get no political mileage from. Gannon is as much a 'journalist' as any one of the MSM elites. Even 'if' Gannon did get his hands on some confidential material, this is what MSM elites have been doing for decades. What a bunch of blather.
To: Dog; Lazamataz; Miss Marple; Grampa Dave; Jim Robinson; William McKinley
They are going to try and tie the Plame/Wilson leak to FR....you just watch. People at FR have been posting what was already leaked in the MSM about Plame/Wilson since day one. That story didn't start with us - not by a long shot.
13
posted on
02/11/2005 10:52:37 AM PST
by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: sam_paine
Makes you wonder if the water in DC really has too much lead.
These brown shirts are going after very basic rights: guns and speech. Frightening indeed!
To: Patti_ORiley
Gannon is no worse than Helen Thomas in his ability to toss softballs at the right targets. His crime is simply not being a liberal.
15
posted on
02/11/2005 10:54:00 AM PST
by
Bogey78O
(Hillary Clinton + Fertility pills + Scott Peterson + rowboat = Success)
To: Patti_ORiley
I find it
extremely unlikely that Gannon was anywhere near the Plame stuff. I've spoken to a friend in the White House Press Corps about this, and he said Gannon was basically a fly on the wall. He came in for the breifings, asked his question daily and left. He was not within the inner circle of reporters who get regular chatty access to Bush's flacks, which would be step one of many to gain the trust of getting anything leaked to him.
And at that, this White House doesn't leak anything anyway. If they did, however, Gannon would be the last person who'd get it. If he actually broke a story that embarassed the big boys, McClellan would never hear the end of it. He doesn't need or want that kind of aggravation.
So the idea that Gannon was leaked anything -- least of all the Plame stuff (even by accident) -- is prepostrous.
16
posted on
02/11/2005 10:54:22 AM PST
by
seamus
To: seamus
We now know that 'Jeff Gannon' had access to classified CIA documents that contained the identity of undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame.
Maybe it's my public skool edumaction, but how do they "know" this? Wouldn't the identity of an undercover CIA Op be held in a secret document?
Owl_Eagle
Guns Before Butter.
To: seamus
Memo to Louise: You're being used. But you probably already know that.
18
posted on
02/11/2005 11:00:09 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: seamus
It's ridiculous, preposterous, absurd, and they know it. Maybe it's time for these Dem hacks to ask if any of the documents Sandy Berger stuffed in his socks and smuggled out of the national security archives have anything to do with Plame. <<--insert eye roll smilie here
19
posted on
02/11/2005 11:00:56 AM PST
by
lonevoice
(Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
To: seamus
"Rep. Slaughter, a long-time advocate for media reform and accountability."
As laughable as the UN appointing Cuba to the Human Rights Commission.
Why does Slaughter say "we now know he had access to CIA documents"? Is she baseing this on the crap their spewing over the Daily Kos?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson