Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congresswoman Calls on Special Prosecutor to Investigate Gannon's Role in Plame Leak
Office of Louise Slaughter | Feb. 11, 2005 | Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-NY

Posted on 02/11/2005 10:30:42 AM PST by seamus

Washington, DC - Rep. Louise M. Slaughter (NY-28), Ranking Member of the House Committee on Rules, and Rep. John Conyers (MI-14), Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, called on Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald to investigate the leaking of a classified Central Intelligence Agency memo containing the identity of undercover agent Valerie Plame to a man at the center of the White House Press Briefing Room scandal, "Jeff Gannon."

Rep. Slaughter, a long-time advocate for media reform and accountability, brought this story into the national spotlight days ago when she wrote President Bush asking for an investigation into the issue.

"This matter is growing more serious by the day.  We now know that 'Jeff Gannon' had access to classified CIA documents that contained the identity of undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame.  This is more than an issue of media manipulation by the White House... this is now an issue of national security," said Rep. Slaughter. "What is the White House hiding?  This man, Mr. Gannon, should never have been admitted into the White House briefing room in the first place. Someone let him in day after day. Someone gave him access to classified CIA documents. Someone must answer for this. It is critical that we uncover the exact nature of the relationship between Gannon and this White House," added Slaughter."

In addition, Reps. Slaughter and Conyers wrote W. Ralph Basham, Director of the Secret Service, calling on his office to provide details on the security clearance of day pass holders in the White House briefing room as well as any and all information they can provide on Mr. Gannon.

"White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan was unable to answer these important questions in yesterday's briefing so we hope the Secret Service will be able to fill in the blanks," said Slaughter. "Since the White House has denied any role or responsibility in this matter I hope the Secret Service can shed some light on their procedures for clearing day pass holders to the White House briefing room," continued Slaughter.

The letters follow:

February 10, 2005

Mr. Patrick J. Fitzgerald

United States Attorney

US Attorney's Office

219 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 5000

Chicago, IL 60656

 

Dear Mr. Fitzgerald:

 

We write to ask that you investigate the leak of a classified Central Intelligence Agency memo containing the identity of undercover agent Valerie Plame to James D. Guckert, a member of the White House press corps. It appears that the White House was so focused on smearing the reputation of Ambassador Joseph Wilson, that it knowingly leaked his wife's identity to a Republican activist posing as a journalist.

 

James D. Guckert, who operated under the false name "Jeff Gannon," and may have engaged in criminal activity, had been attending press events at the White House for up to three years. Mr. Guckert reportedly received an internal and classified CIA memo that revealed the identity of Ambassador Joseph Wilson's wife. Because of the extremely sensitive nature of this leak, and its relation to the investigation you are conducting, we believe that you as special counsel are the most appropriate person to conduct the inquiry.

 

Under Department of Justice regulations, a special counsel should investigate when (1) a "criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted," (2) the investigation "by a United States Attorney Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department," and (3) "it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter."1 In the present case all three factors have been met.

 

As has been long discussed, revealing the identity of an undercover agent violates myriad laws. Whoever in the Administration gave Mr. Guckert the memo risked Ms. Plame's very life and must be punished to the full extent of the law.

 

There is a clear conflict of interest in the Administration investigating Mr. Guckert's role in this crime. Mr. Guckert and the White House press operation work together closely to forward the President's policies.

 

First, Mr. Guckert would not be considered a bona fide journalist by his peers in the press corps, as most of his claims to legitimacy have already been discredited. Access to the President and his press corps is highly competitive, and many seasoned journalists have not had the honor of attending the events or enjoying the access Mr. Guckert has. That a person of these dubious qualifications was given such close contact to the President, perhaps in violation of standard security procedures, demonstrates the Administration's affinity for and bias towards Mr. Guckert.

 

Second, Mr. Guckert's questions clearly reiterated the White House's policy, and simply asked for concurrence. Finally, Mr. Guckert's "articles," published by a news front for GOPUSA, track White House talking points word for word.

 

Clearly, Mr. Guckert returned the White House's favor by advancing the President's policies with gusto. With such a close relationship between Mr. Guckert and the White House, the conflict of an administration-led investigation is all too apparent.

 

Finally, the public interest has been thwarted far too long over the leak of Ms. Plame's identity. It has been over a year and a half since Robert Novak published Plame's identity and we are no closer to finding who in the Administration illegally leaked her status as an undercover agent. Having a special counsel immediately follow up this lead is necessary to ensure that those who risk their lives for our country to gather intelligence are fully protected.

 

We look forward to hearing whether you will be following up on this new information, or if you have, what progress you have made.

 

Sincerely,

 

Louise Slaughter
                     John Conyers, Jr.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cia; cialeak; gannon; jeffgannon; josephwilson; lautenberg; plame; slaughter; valerieplane
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
The attacks on Jeff Gannon continue. What evidence does Rep. Slaughter present to even suggest Gannon had anything to do with the Plame leak? I thought it was leaked to Bob Novak.

It's pretty scary when a journalist, or blogger, or any private citizen can prompt members of Congress to call for a criminal investigation just for being pro-Bush.

1 posted on 02/11/2005 10:30:43 AM PST by seamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: seamus

2 posted on 02/11/2005 10:33:29 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
PING!!!

This goes along with your earlier thread.

3 posted on 02/11/2005 10:33:33 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Never play leapfrog with a unicorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamus
Rep. Slaughter, a long-time advocate for media reform and accountability

The amazing thing is that people are able to right this kind of stuff without laughing themselves to death.

4 posted on 02/11/2005 10:36:16 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Miss Marple

They are going to try and tie the Plame/Wilson leak to FR....you just watch.


5 posted on 02/11/2005 10:36:43 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: seamus; All

Is this abuse of power?


6 posted on 02/11/2005 10:38:07 AM PST by Madeleine Ward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamus

"And just who let Hillary have 900 FBI files?" she was later heard to ask?


(HA!)


7 posted on 02/11/2005 10:38:50 AM PST by Mr. K (this space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

oops - right = write. I hope Rep. Slaughter's online accountability brigade doesn't charge me with felonious mispelling of a homonym.


8 posted on 02/11/2005 10:38:55 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: seamus

I am Joseph Steffen, and I approved this message.




Joseph Steffen aka ncpac
PO BOX 177 B
Baltimore,MD, 21235
(410) 933-8511

9 posted on 02/11/2005 10:39:17 AM PST by G.Mason (The replies by this poster are meant for self amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
They are going to try and tie the Plame/Wilson leak to FR....you just watch.

It's a damned shame that O'MALLEY CHEATS ON HIS WIFE!!!!

10 posted on 02/11/2005 10:45:55 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: seamus
It's pretty scary when a journalist, or blogger, or any private citizen can prompt members of Congress to call for a criminal investigation just for being pro-Bush.

Scary, but not surprising....

11 posted on 02/11/2005 10:47:15 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamus
This really is a 'non-event' which the lame democrats will get no political mileage from. Gannon is as much a 'journalist' as any one of the MSM elites. Even 'if' Gannon did get his hands on some confidential material, this is what MSM elites have been doing for decades. What a bunch of blather.
12 posted on 02/11/2005 10:50:11 AM PST by Patti_ORiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog; Lazamataz; Miss Marple; Grampa Dave; Jim Robinson; William McKinley
They are going to try and tie the Plame/Wilson leak to FR....you just watch.

People at FR have been posting what was already leaked in the MSM about Plame/Wilson since day one. That story didn't start with us - not by a long shot.

13 posted on 02/11/2005 10:52:37 AM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Makes you wonder if the water in DC really has too much lead.
These brown shirts are going after very basic rights: guns and speech. Frightening indeed!


14 posted on 02/11/2005 10:53:04 AM PST by pieces of time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Patti_ORiley

Gannon is no worse than Helen Thomas in his ability to toss softballs at the right targets. His crime is simply not being a liberal.


15 posted on 02/11/2005 10:54:00 AM PST by Bogey78O (Hillary Clinton + Fertility pills + Scott Peterson + rowboat = Success)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Patti_ORiley
I find it extremely unlikely that Gannon was anywhere near the Plame stuff. I've spoken to a friend in the White House Press Corps about this, and he said Gannon was basically a fly on the wall. He came in for the breifings, asked his question daily and left. He was not within the inner circle of reporters who get regular chatty access to Bush's flacks, which would be step one of many to gain the trust of getting anything leaked to him.

And at that, this White House doesn't leak anything anyway. If they did, however, Gannon would be the last person who'd get it. If he actually broke a story that embarassed the big boys, McClellan would never hear the end of it. He doesn't need or want that kind of aggravation.

So the idea that Gannon was leaked anything -- least of all the Plame stuff (even by accident) -- is prepostrous.

16 posted on 02/11/2005 10:54:22 AM PST by seamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: seamus

We now know that 'Jeff Gannon' had access to classified CIA documents that contained the identity of undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame.

Maybe it's my public skool edumaction, but how do they "know" this?  Wouldn't the identity of an undercover CIA Op be held in a secret document?

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

17 posted on 02/11/2005 10:59:01 AM PST by End Times Sentinel (I FEEL LIKE I'M IN CRAZYTOWN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamus

Memo to Louise: You're being used. But you probably already know that.


18 posted on 02/11/2005 11:00:09 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamus

It's ridiculous, preposterous, absurd, and they know it. Maybe it's time for these Dem hacks to ask if any of the documents Sandy Berger stuffed in his socks and smuggled out of the national security archives have anything to do with Plame. <<--insert eye roll smilie here


19 posted on 02/11/2005 11:00:56 AM PST by lonevoice (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: seamus

"Rep. Slaughter, a long-time advocate for media reform and accountability."

As laughable as the UN appointing Cuba to the Human Rights Commission.

Why does Slaughter say "we now know he had access to CIA documents"? Is she baseing this on the crap their spewing over the Daily Kos?


20 posted on 02/11/2005 11:01:00 AM PST by Iluvlabs not libs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson