Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McDonald's to pay $8.5 million in trans fat lawsuit (Here we go)
Reuters ^ | 2-12-05 | Adam Tanner

Posted on 02/12/2005 5:54:15 AM PST by SheLion

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb 11 (Reuters) - McDonald's  has agreed to pay $8.5 million to settle a lawsuit over artery-clogging trans fats in its cooking oils, the company said on Friday.

McDonald's said it will donate $7 million to the American Heart Association and spend another $1.5 million to inform the public of its trans fat plans.

The settlement is the result of litigation from a San Francisco area activist who has been seeking to raise public awareness of the health dangers from the trans fatty acids (TFAs) in hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oils.

Trans fats are used in thousands of processed food products, often giving the crunch to French fries, cookies, and cereals.

They are created in processing vegetable oils and have been found to be as unhealthy as pure cholesterol. The latest official U.S. nutrition recommendations suggest limiting their intake.

"McDonald's has reached an agreement to further notify our customers about the status of our ongoing initiative to reduce TFAs in our cooking oil," the company said in a statement.

Stephen Joseph, a lawyer who founded BanTransFats.com, sued McDonald's over complaints the firm did not properly inform the public that it had encountered delays in plans to lessen the trans fats in its cooking oils.

Joseph said his site would receive $7,500, as would another plaintiff in the case.

"McDonald's has been successful in reducing TFA levels in our Chicken McNuggets, Crispy Chicken Sandwich and McChicken Sandwich," the fast food firm said. "McDonald's continues to work hard on our initiative to reduce TFAs in our cooking oil."

British-born Joseph first gained publicity for his cause by suing Kraft Foods  two years ago to highlight the trans fat content of much-beloved Oreo cookies. The company has since moved to remove trans fats from its snack foods.

"While there is a difference of opinion regarding whether McDonald's gave effective notice to its customers that the oil was not changed, McDonald's deserves recognition and credit for having achieved a reduction in the trans fat levels in its chicken products and for working diligently over the last two years to test additional cooking oils," Joseph said in a statement.

Dunkin' Donuts, a unit of Britain's Allied Domecq Plc , and other companies have in recent months introduced new products free of trans fats.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: atkins; courts; fastfood; fattys; frenchfries; lawyers; obesity; sue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last
To: marty60

Lawyers should have to have clown faces tatooed on before they can begin their practice. That way no one will take them too seriously.


61 posted on 02/12/2005 6:49:23 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister
"And who do we complain to because Oreo cookies now taste like poop?"

On behalf of all of us, I want to thank you for being willing to "take one for the team" and perform that particular taste test comparison. You are far, far braver than I. ;-)

62 posted on 02/12/2005 6:50:26 AM PST by Pablo64 ("Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

I agree with you. I don't believe in suing but the food industry really doesn't care what they use as "food" ingredients as long as it is cheap. If people understood that the process to make partially hydrogenated oils is the same process that is used to make plastic then they would think twice about eating the crap.


63 posted on 02/12/2005 6:51:19 AM PST by CajunConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Corporate cowardice.


64 posted on 02/12/2005 6:52:03 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Might try eating just one double meat double cheese at a time:


65 posted on 02/12/2005 6:56:02 AM PST by TexasCowboy (Texan by birth, citizen of Jesusland by the Grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
I find myself cooking and baking at home more and more and eating out less.

You and me both.....and beside tasting better, and being better for you.....it's CHEAPER!!!!!

66 posted on 02/12/2005 6:56:09 AM PST by Gabz (Anti-smoker gnatzies...small minds buzzing in your business..............SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

just lovely...before too long when you order something at a fast food joint the cashier will be required to tell you, "ma'am, you are aware that the choice you made can be very very bad for your health, right? Yes? Ok, I'm going to need you to sign this disclaimer..."


67 posted on 02/12/2005 6:59:27 AM PST by melbell (A Freudian slip is when you mean one thing, and say your mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister
Regarding Oreo cookies, they've finally gotten one on the market that's lo-carb and non-sugar.

What a treat for diabetics! Eating one of those was just like being a kid again.

BTW, to a non-diabetic these are the ones that taste kind of like cardboard I'm sure. So don't eat them!

68 posted on 02/12/2005 7:01:02 AM PST by muawiyah ((how cynical can we sound today))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
"Yes, but obesity doesn't foul the air."

Why is it that secondhand smoke, even outdoors in baseball stadiums, is so objectionable to the cigarette police and fumes from automobile exhaust, which are thousands of times more toxic, don't bother them at all? Every cigarette vigilante I know drives a car.
69 posted on 02/12/2005 7:08:27 AM PST by layman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
Concerning the source of fat that you pack away in your fat cells ~ that's what happens when insulin opens up little gateways in your fat cells and stuffs in the extra sugar not needed by your brain or immediate muscle demand.

You get most of that sugar from the starch you consume. One source of starch is the potato, and just one is going to hurt you more than all the trans-fat you might consume in a week.

A Snickers bar is safer.

Protein may also be converted to sugar as needed by the body. Fortunately the body disposes of any protein consumed in excess of 40% of your caloric intake. That makes the hamburger you get with the French fries relatively safe compared to the bun that wraps it.

Best bet at the fast food joints is to stick to the meat and salads, and until the national chains figure out how to remove both the starch and the transfats in the French fries, just avoid them!

70 posted on 02/12/2005 7:12:12 AM PST by muawiyah ((how cynical can we sound today))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

You will take flack, but I agree with you. The problem with transfat is that there is little way that you know you are eating it. Labels do not always identify it. It can be "partially hydrogenated vegetable oil" or buried in with the other fats.

If you want to avoid them, there is no way if you eat out, since there is no disclosure on a menu. Transfat are bad news. I shifted long ago to butter from margarine, most of which are transfat.


71 posted on 02/12/2005 7:12:26 AM PST by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy

Again, throw away the potatoes, throw away the buns, dump the milkshake, and eat the burgers, with double cheese, in the knowledge that you are getting about as safe a meal at a fast food restaurant as is possible.


72 posted on 02/12/2005 7:15:41 AM PST by muawiyah ((how cynical can we sound today))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

73 posted on 02/12/2005 7:33:18 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyWest; Shooter 2.5; SheLion

I agree the dumping of most transfats is a good idea.

I just don't like seeing it being done by "activists" and trial lawyers just out to line their pockets with multi-million dollar settlements and lawsuits.

If you look deep enough at these suits against fast-food you will find many of the same names as the lawyers who first started attacking the tobacco industry.

John Banzhaf is among them, and has claimed on national television that they are using the same tactics agasint fast-food as they perfected against the tobacco industry. his first case against them was thrown out, but so were the first ones against tobacco.......they will keep suing until they get capitulation from the industry, ala tobacco, or they find a sympathetic (read activist) judge.


74 posted on 02/12/2005 7:35:10 AM PST by Gabz (Anti-smoker gnatzies...small minds buzzing in your business..............SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

No, no, no......., it's the devour the "super size" menu!

Not the defeat of the "super size" menu!


75 posted on 02/12/2005 7:35:34 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9

Everyone,
Say goodbye to Twinkies and EVERY snack other than organically grown fruits and veggies.


76 posted on 02/12/2005 7:37:19 AM PST by Muzzle_em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
and a new law from the state says that lard butts can't eat at buffets, burger joints, or fried anything joints.
77 posted on 02/12/2005 7:39:09 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
Time to go after Big Food and Big Booze. Taking down Big Tobacco showed us the way.

Like the lawyers say; Stop eating, drinking and smoking and you'll be just fine.
78 posted on 02/12/2005 7:39:13 AM PST by RetroWarrior ("We count it death to falter, not to die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; SheLion; Mears; Shooter 2.5; IronJack; All
We smokers can sit back with a smug grin and say, "Tol ya so!!", and we did!
But it's a bitter sweet victory for what we've been saying.

None of this is about health; it's about controlling the lives of every American, and about lining the pockets of every lawyer who can zero in on a method of facilitating that control.

Good grief, people! What happened to personal responsibility?

79 posted on 02/12/2005 7:40:18 AM PST by TexasCowboy (Texan by birth, citizen of Jesusland by the Grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
The elimination of Trans-fat in foods is very good news.

It wasn't that long ago that trans-fatty acids were considered a 'healthful' alternative to Butter. 'Healthy Choice' my ass!
80 posted on 02/12/2005 7:41:34 AM PST by RetroWarrior ("We count it death to falter, not to die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson