Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boy is aborted 3 times and lives
The Sunday Times (UK) ^ | February 13, 2005 | by Lois Rogers and Sarah-Kate Templeton

Posted on 02/12/2005 7:13:32 PM PST by aculeus

A BABY survived at least three attempts to abort it from the womb and was born alive at 24 weeks old.

The boy was delivered in hospital after his 24- year-old mother changed her mind about wanting the child after feeling it move on the way home from an abortion clinic.

Although the clinic had told her an ultrasound scan had confirmed the child was dead, she went into labour that afternoon and the boy was born alive.

Now two years old and healthy, he is the first long-term abortion survivor to have been born so prematurely. His remarkable entrance into the world is documented in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

The mother had not realised she was going to have a baby until 22 weeks into the pregnancy and felt that she could not cope with a second child. She was given a series of abortion drugs over four days at a private clinic.

After birth the child was rushed to the hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit where he was on a ventilator for 7Å weeks. He fought off several life-threatening infections and suffered from severe lung disease for his first six months. He was allowed home after seven months of treatment.

Dr Paul Clarke, one of the report’s authors and the baby’s doctor at Hope hospital in Salford, Greater Manchester, said: “This mother went through extreme hardship waiting to see if her baby was going to make it. She was told to expect him to die so many times. I am full of admiration for her.”

The attempted abortions had been carried out at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service’s Blackdown clinic in Leamington Spa, Warwickshire.

Clarke reveals that paediatricians often intervene to save babies who have survived abortions.

He writes: “Late abortion raises serious practical, ethical and professional concerns. The dilemma of being telephoned about an infant born showing signs of life following termination of pregnancy is one that many paediatricians have faced. If viable, and resuscitated, those infants who survive may suffer significant illness.”

The paper calls for a review of late abortions at private clinics where there are no staff qualified to give emergency treatment if babies are born alive.

Ann Furedi, chief executive of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, said: “It sounds highly unusual. Usually we would keep a woman at the clinic until she delivered the foetus. When women are having a late medical abortion they are normally attended in the clinic by nursing staff with specialist midwifery training.

“It would never be the case that a woman would be discharged with the expectation that she would deliver at home.”

Copyright 2005 Times Newspapers Ltd.


TOPICS: Extended News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionsurvivor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2005 7:13:32 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Send this to Hillary Clinton. She can write a letter to the boy telling him he shouldn't have been born if only she could "fix healthcare".


2 posted on 02/12/2005 7:18:16 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Mighty fine health case system they got over there.


3 posted on 02/12/2005 7:20:01 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

care, that is.


4 posted on 02/12/2005 7:20:16 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

BTTT!


5 posted on 02/12/2005 7:20:43 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
So is the mother going to sue?
6 posted on 02/12/2005 7:23:38 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
The dilemma of being telephoned about an infant born showing signs of life following termination of pregnancy is one that many paediatricians have faced.

Is this true? How many babies have survived?

7 posted on 02/12/2005 7:23:50 PM PST by wallcrawlr (www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

The boy sounds like a fighter to me. Hope his mother named him Winston.


8 posted on 02/12/2005 7:24:52 PM PST by auboy (Saying and doing are often miles apart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Somebody explain how you can get 20 years in a federal pen for terminating an Eagle fetus (messing with their eggs), but nothing for terminating a human fetus.
9 posted on 02/12/2005 7:25:23 PM PST by Lokibob (All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

So in the UK they send women home with dead babies inside them(??)


10 posted on 02/12/2005 7:28:01 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
“It would never be the case that a woman would be discharged with the expectation that she would deliver at home.”

I get the feeling the nursing staff would make sure there would be no survivor.

11 posted on 02/12/2005 7:29:15 PM PST by sonofagun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

What world do I live in? Who could do such a thing in the first place? Hasn't anyone ever heard of adoption? Once again I ask, what world do I live in?


12 posted on 02/12/2005 7:30:18 PM PST by mhuye (Quit Crucifying the Messiah again and again with this Mother Mary nonsense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

The body ejects the dead child just as it would in a natural miscarriage.


13 posted on 02/12/2005 7:31:15 PM PST by Free and Armed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Abortion MURDERS a living child.


14 posted on 02/12/2005 7:36:15 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
"Clarke reveals that paediatricians often intervene to save babies who have survived abortions."

Well, isn't that big of them? < sarcasm >

"If viable, and resuscitated, those infants who survive may suffer significant illness.”

And there should be a heavy enough burden of guilt to go around for both mother and doctor abortion practitioner in knowing that the responsibility for the suffering of these little ones rests squarely on THEIR shoulders. Of course, instead of doing the right thing and turning away from this evil, the socialists will probably use it as "evidence" to justify terminating children after they are born.

15 posted on 02/12/2005 7:38:31 PM PST by sweetliberty (Blind stupidity or blind loyalty is still blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free and Armed
The body ejects the dead child just as it would in a natural miscarriage.

I find it amazing that any society would sanction such a horrifying spectacle as the mother must witness in the aftermath of such an event.

16 posted on 02/12/2005 7:39:39 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
The baby was born "alive" at 24 weeks. How ironic, considering that in the UK the cut off for abortion on demand is exactly 24 weeks.
17 posted on 02/12/2005 7:42:29 PM PST by two134711
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob

***Somebody explain how you can get 20 years in a federal pen for terminating an Eagle fetus (messing with their eggs), but nothing for terminating a human fetus.***

Ohhh, EXCELLENT!


18 posted on 02/12/2005 7:44:27 PM PST by kitkat (Our Founding Fathers are PROUD of Pres. George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Wow. Every aspect of this is just incredible. How will she ever face that son?


19 posted on 02/12/2005 7:52:02 PM PST by A knight without armor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

This is one seriously mixed up mother. She goes for an abortion, changes her mind, feels the baby stirring, goes back again, gets the abortion drugs, goes home, delivers the baby, and rushes it to a hospital neonatal unit. Now, as far as I can understand this article, the baby is home again, now two years old, with the same mother who tried to abort him.

I sure hope she doesn't change her mind again.


20 posted on 02/12/2005 7:52:38 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson