"Seven percent of American women who do not use contraception account for 53 percent of all unintended pregnancies," Clinton saidyet not ONE single word as to WHO that 7% are or what SHE plans to do to get their mind right!!!
Posted on 02/13/2005 7:33:53 AM PST by Libloather
yada, yada, yada...What a meaningless wish... There were tighter races in other states (PA for example) where demomcrats won, so if less than 60,000 of those democrats had voted republican it would have been a massive landslide for Bush, so what is their point???
And that's why abortion is a good thing.
Without Roe vs. Wade there would have been enough democrats to easily win the last 2 elections.
So9
I've already tested her sincerity. She's lying. How do I know? Her lips were moving.
She'll say absolutely anything to further herself and her goals. She can never be trusted. Never.
So secret, in fact that your Mom or Dad may not know that you're crying in a doctor's office because SOMEONE told you abortion was the best way!!
but the plurality vote across the country was what - about 3 million more for Bush - and Feinstein wants to eliminate the electoral college. (Do the dems talk to each other LOL)
This mantra of 'only 60,000 votes is just another example of how they think the American people are stupid
And without Roe v. Wade there would be more workers per retiree and Social Security might not be the mess it is. There's no telling how many new businesses or maybe even whole industries that simply never materialized due to abortion.
"If just 60,000 more people in Ohio had voted Democratic, McAuliffe ruefully notes, he'd be picking up orders from President Kerry and heading for a new job as ambassador to Great Britain. A tweak here, a TV ad there, and the Democrats are back in business."
Gee Terri. When the fraud in Wisconsin is uncovered and when those 105% voting records in Dem districts are corrected, we have a, a, oh my, we have a LANDSLIDE!!!
"Seven percent of American women who do not use contraception account for 53 percent of all unintended pregnancies," Clinton saidyet not ONE single word as to WHO that 7% are or what SHE plans to do to get their mind right!!!
Sorry,the day when Hillary recognizes that her husbands actions with Monica went a long way to cheapen and introduce young people to sex,then her words will mean something.
"Perhaps Clinton's offer was just posturing."
D'ya think? This is about abortion, but the only way the demonrats will win the presidency, House, and Senate back is to apply the same principle across the board, to wit: "Oh yeah, I understand your position. But let's compromise, you come a little MY way, and we'll settle. OK?" The fence sitters will buy it like candy.
Thus we lose incrementally rather than all at once.
We're better off if people that stupid don't breed.
We're better off if anyone stupid enough to get an abortion doesn't breed.
SO9
In other words, it would have been easier to try to steal the election. We would have had another fiasco like what they tried to get away with in Florida.....They is what the rats were striving for. Fortunately, the gentlemen in charge of the voting in Ohio even though a democrat, was an almost extinct rarity in the DNC, honest.
"They were taken to a government-controlled health clinic, told to disrobe ... (and) examined by a government doctor with a ... secret police officer watching."
"Hillary, honey... have you seen muh passport larely? I'm thinkin' of takin' me a li'l ol' trip down t'thet 'Romania' place..."
If you mean Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell....he is a Republican and running for Governor in 2006.
"Who would more than likely get an abortion - a liberal or a conservative?"
The issue of getting an abortion is not so black and white as you want to make it out to be.
... several decades too late:
What does she think a party platform is, and how do you represent both, you can't. She's gettin' her advice from Bubba, go to the right and talk about praying....yeah...that's the ticket.
So what's your solution? Women being forced to have babies they don't want? Women offering up unwanted babies to orphanges (sp?) that will have to take care of them, placing the burden on all taxpayers?
What's wrong with administering medication (birth control) that makes contraception impossible?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.