Skip to comments.Cosmic Explosion Among the Brightest in Recorded History
Posted on 02/18/2005 12:19:03 PM PST by PatrickHenry
Scientists have detected a flash of light from across the Galaxy so powerful that it bounced off the Moon and lit up the Earth's upper atmosphere. The flash was brighter than anything ever detected from beyond our Solar System and lasted over a tenth of a second. NASA and European satellites and many radio telescopes detected the flash and its aftermath on December 27, 2004. Two science teams report about this event at a special press event today at NASA headquarters.
The scientists said the light came from a "giant flare" on the surface of an exotic neutron star, called a magnetar. The apparent magnitude was brighter than a full moon and all historical star explosions. The light was brightest in the gamma-ray energy range, far more energetic than visible light or X-rays and invisible to our eyes.
Such a close and powerful eruption raises the question of whether an even larger influx of gamma rays, disturbing the atmosphere, was responsible for one of the mass extinctions known to have occurred on Earth hundreds of millions of years ago. Also, if giant flares can be this powerful, then some gamma-ray bursts (thought to be very distant black-hole-forming star explosions) could actually be from neutron star eruptions in nearby galaxies.
NASA's newly launched Swift satellite and the NSF-funded Very Large Array (VLA) were two of many observatories that observed the event, arising from neutron star SGR 1806-20, about 50,000 light years from Earth in the constellation Sagittarius.
"This might be a once-in-a-lifetime event for astronomers, as well as for the neutron star," said Dr. David Palmer of Los Alamos National Laboratory, lead author on a paper describing the Swift observation. "We know of only two other giant flares in the past 35 years, and this December event was one hundred times more powerful."
Dr. Bryan Gaensler of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., is lead author on a report describing the VLA observation, which tracked the ejected material as it flew out into interstellar space. Other key scientific teams are associated with radio telescopes in Australia, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, India and the United States, as well as with NASA's High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI).
A neutron star is the core remains of a star once several times more massive than our Sun. When such stars deplete their nuclear fuel, they explode -- an event called a supernova. The remaining core is dense, fast-spinning, highly magnetic, and only about 15 miles in diameter. Millions of neutron stars fill our Milky Way galaxy.
Scientists have discovered about a dozen ultrahigh-magnetic neutron stars, called magnetars. The magnetic field around a magnetar is about 1,000 trillion gauss, strong enough to strip information from a credit card at a distance halfway to the moon. (Ordinary neutron stars measure a mere trillion gauss; the Earth's magnetic field is about 0.5 gauss.)
Four of these magnetars are also called soft gamma repeaters, or SGRs, because they flare up randomly and release gamma rays. Such episodes release about 10^30 to 10^35 watts for about a second, or up to millions of times more energy than our Sun. For a tenth of a second, the giant flare on SGR 1806-20 unleashed energy at a rate of about 10^40 watts. The total energy produced was more than the Sun emits in 150,000 years.
"The next biggest flare ever seen from any soft gamma repeater was peanuts compared to this incredible December 27 event," said Gaensler. "Had this happened within 10 light years of us, it would have severely damaged our atmosphere. Fortunately, all the magnetars we know of are much farther away than this."
A scientific debate raged in the 1980s over whether gamma-ray bursts were star explosions from beyond our Galaxy or eruptions on nearby neutron stars. By the late 1990s it became clear that gamma-ray bursts did indeed originate very far away and that SGRs were a different phenomenon. But the extraordinary giant flare on SGR 1806-20 reopens the debate, according to Dr. Chryssa Kouveliotou of NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, who took part in both the Swift and VLA analysis.
A sizeable percentage of "short" gamma-ray bursts, less than two seconds, could be SGR flares, she said. These would come from galaxies within about a 100 million light years from Earth. (Long gamma-ray bursts appear to be black-hole-forming star explosions billions of light years away.)
"An answer to the 'short' gamma-ray burst mystery could come any day now that Swift is in orbit", said Swift lead scientist Neil Gehrels. "Swift saw this event after only about a month on the job."
Awaiting the obligatory "It's Bush's fault" post
The Earth equivalence of 21st century American conservatism.
No doubt caused by Global Warming...
I'm all for sending a contingent of Dem Senators and Representatives out there to investigate.
So that's why the waiter refused my credit card. It was the SGR flare and not the poor state of my finances.
I'll "It's Bush's fault".
"It's Bush's fault"
"It's Bush's fault"
Are they saying it was naked eye earth visible?
I need to think back to where I was on December 27.
It was the flash from God's camera...he wants something to remember us by...
It was a Monday, the day after the tsunami...
I registered a couple of pounds heavier on the scales that day. I knew it wasn't me.
We can certainly cast blame for this extraordinary event right at the feet of the VRWC.
I hear John Kerry has a plan for this....
I assume you weren't on duty that night. Or perhaps some young lovely was taking the tour of your control room and you became distracted. Hee hee.
So brighter than anything in all of the last 20 years or so.
...and thankfully we do not see this every day or we would run out of days very quickly as a species!
A severe gamma burst could eradicate all life on earth. Of course, it probably would not be strong enough to kill us all at once, but enough to make us linger for a few days in pain.......
Hey! It's Friday! Think happy thoughts!
Birth Name: Paris Whitney Hilton
Birthdate: February 17, 1981
Birthplace: New York, New York
Occupations: Actor, Writer, Musician, Model
Quote: "That's hot!"
Claim to Fame: Heiress to the Hilton Hotel empire
"The light was brightest in the gamma-ray energy range, far more energetic than visible light or X-rays and invisible to our eyes."
Dr. Banner, paging Dr. Banner...
Right, but it also said "The apparent magnitude was brighter than a full moon"
Inquiring minds want to know!
Wow! You are right. It did not specifically say that none of the spectrum was visible to the naked eye.
I usually nail other people for making these kind of assumptions and you nailed me! Good job!
Now I have to kill you.... 8^>
I had advance warning and played it safe.
At least have the decency to send flowers to my funeral.
The Apparent Magnitude is how bright a star appears to us here on the Earth. The Absolute Magnitude is how bright a star would appear if it were exactly ten parsecs away from the Earth. (Close to 33 light years).
1) Apparent magnitude is usually denoted with a small m and absolute magnitude uses a capital M.
2) The magnitude scale is backwards of what you might think, the larger the number the fainter the object.
It hit here on December 27th. When do you suppose it left "there?"
I'm thinking at least a week, not counting bathroom stops.
We had a full moon on December 26, so it wouldn't have been naked eye noticeable anyway.
About 50,000 years ago. The article says:
... two of many observatories that observed the event, arising from neutron star SGR 1806-20, about 50,000 light years from Earth in the constellation Sagittarius.
I need to think back to where I was on December 27
DAMN! I missed it, I blinked...DO OVER!
Of course, if the universe is only 6,000 years old, that would change my previous answer.
Oh my! I don't think the literal genesis crowd can explain this one, unless, of course, they've found a way to accelerate the speed of light while we weren't paying attention.
Considering it was invisible gamma rays, it's something you'll continue to not see any day.
gamma-ray bursts ping
Oh, the YECs have various "The speed of light has radically changed" theories, actually.
About 50,000 years ago.
Gots to learn to read the thread LOL! Ya beat me to it. :-)
I can handle some questions without help. But even in this case, it's good to have expert support.
It appears this object was only 6 degrees from the sun when the event occurred. The sun was in Sagittarius on December 27. Even if the object may have had a visual magnitude equal to that of the full moon, it is unlikely that few if any people would have noticed it.
Yeah; but if your scientifik theorez kan't tell us what day of the week it wuz there when it left, what good is it?
< /anti-science Luddite mode>
Someone lit a match in the presence of the vast intellectual flatulence of the democrat party.....
So, are you bragging or complaining?
Well, as the initiator of several threads, I've had a great many people posting messages to me saying "Bush did it." I'm beginning to think he's the Intelligent Designer.