Hillary Clinton's Popularity Up in State, Even Among Republicans

NY Times ^ | 2/22/05 | RAYMOND HERNANDEZ

[SlightOfTongue]

Not to worry. Our conservative base or the bluedog left voters aren't stupid enough to fall for the "Lipstick on the pig" scenario.

We'd better shore up the voter fraud however, or anything is possible.

[neverdem]

FReepmail me if you want on or off my New York ping list.

I don't have time to read the whole thread.

With Chuck winning 71 percent last November, I wouldn't discount the story because it's from the Times.

With pubbies like this we're doomed!

[tioga]

No one called me for my opinion. NEVER would I vote for her, even in a poll........

[xm177e2]

there is nothing family value ish about being gay if children are involved

So what? All I said was there there are plenty of things family value ish that do not conflict with gay rights (because they don't involve gays at all).

[Vision]

You wouldn't want to make a sizable side bet on that would you? Hmmm?

You've taken my quote of out context. If Hillary becomes a real hawk on the border, and Bush stays his course...I might be open to a financial wager...

[Deetes]

LOL

[neverdem]

John Kerry almost managed to lose a Democratic Senate seat in 1996 in Massachusetts, the most liberal state in the country. He's a lousy politician. Always has been.

So how come he ran unopposed by the pubbies in 2002? Did you inspect the pubbies to ensure that they were castrated?

[neverdem]

Anyone who believes this article needs to wake up, this is the NY Timew writing this. Half the staff is gay.

Do you deny the senior senator from NY won by 71 percent last November? I don't want to say his name.

[LauraleeBraswell]

Hillary hasn't done anything for New York State.

Ask New Yorkers about Schumer. Schumer is much more popular. I would give him an approval rating over Hillary.

We're all on Hillary watch. This week she went to Iraq and came out with a brand new stance, that we need to stay in Iraq because leaving would give the insurgency the the upper hand. Thank you so much Hillary for stating the obvious, But what about last year when she said that women in Iraq were better off under Saddam than the US intervention?
And that all they had to do was stay out of Saddam's way. NO Hillary, women were not better off. By the Way while in Iraq she met with US soldiers. When one soldier was asked whether or not he would vote for Senator Clinton, his response was "Negative"

[John Lenin]

How many New Squares do you think it took to get to 71% ?

[LibertarianInExile]

You keep on imagining that wedge issues won't split the party...but it's not about splitting the party. It's about attracting the middle and turning out the base. The Republicans turned out their base better than the Rats last time, and pulled more middle votes. And next time, we don't know that will happen. The Clintons got elected to 8 years in the White House, no matter how much vitriol this website and the rest of the right wing poured out, because the Clintons are very good at what they do, and Republicans in their blindness did not nominate a candidate who could appeal to the middle or energize the base.

Your premature declaration of victory is typical of the crowd that thought Dole was a wonderful candidate. You gloss over problems, refusing to prepare and preferring to keep your head up your crack, sticking it out only to spout insults at anyone who says the GOP is remotely wrong on anything. That willful ignorance is how a loser like Dole got nominated. That's how Dole lost against the weakest Rat nominee since Bryan.

I anticipated more smartass remarks which just ignored my comments, but thought optimistically. Not surprisingly, I got the smartass remarks. Unlike you, I learn from experience and criticism instead of ignoring it. I shouldn't have bothered, then, and don't worry about me bothering with your posts in the future. You've convinced me of that with the pages of sanctimonious blathering about Buchanan and Dobbs which you posted. I attempted to respond to your initial insulting little screed without being too harsh, but your continuing pride in your willful ignorance, er, "wisdom," is proof I shouldn't bother. Goodbye.

"A change of opinions is almost unknown in an elderly military man." - G.K. Chesterton

[neverdem]

How many New Squares do you think it took to get to 71% ?

LOL!

I believe it is a combination of three things. Many folks have had it and left NY. Those who left are being replaced with idiots. The RINOs in NY are so bad we have our own Conservative Party.

In NYC, I recently heard that 4 out 10 residents were born in another country.

The following pdf link shows annual population growth by state. NY State is 6th from last for the period 1970 - 2002.

http://niip.wsu.edu/unitedstates/comuspdf/pdcPopus.pdf

[John Lenin]

I have no faith in election totals anymore, W didn't come to CA once to campaign though he did spend a lot money on TV adds. It might be better to fix the immigration policies than do what we are doing now. I have no faith in the RATS, who knows what they will do if they lose anymore elections.

[Cold Heat]

Must have hit a real nerve with the Dobbs comments.

Too bad. Libertines are so easy to infuriate. I have a lot of experience.

BTW, I never did like Dole and new he was a bust. Never have understood why they anointed him. As to the rest, (and I don't give a squat what you think of me, but I do have a opinion of you).....I think you are wrong.

This election will be different. The Dems are going to split as well.

Who ever splits less, will win.

[PhilDragoo]

[ntnychik]

Hillary getting popular??

Don't even start with me. To think we may be the launching pad for the nightmare of '08 gives me a migraine.

[potlatch]

They've got to start their propaganda early!

[MeekOneGOP]

Hillary sittin' on her Throne. What a hoot!

[Pagey]

A "Gee, I missed this dogbarf of an article too" BUMP!