Posted on 2/23/2005, 6:58:52 AM by Jim Robinson
Edited on 2/23/2005, 7:03:31 AM by Jim Robinson. [history]
ON THE DAY Mayor Martin O'Malley denounced rumors he had had an extramarital affair - rumors that became public when a state employee and longtime aide to Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich was discovered spreading them on the Internet [B/S, the rumors broke on the Sun's own website as admitted in this very column]...
~snip~
Reporters and editors have been doing their jobs. They had been pursuing rumors and tips about O'Malley but could not confirm them. Because The Sun does not report unsubstantiated rumors [ROFLMAO] in the news pages, no matter who or what the subject is, no article about the O'Malley rumors was ever published.
~snip~
Because anonymous figures [aka sleazy Democrat moles] can use Web sites to make accusations that can destroy reputations and careers, a newspaper cannot allow competitive pressures or any other reason to lower its standards [ROFLMAO again]. Although some might question this, The Sun takes these standards very seriously [I've got a bridge I can sell you].
~snip~
Steffen's most damaging comments came in e-mail exchanges with MD4BUSH, the username of a Web site member who, Nitkin reports, could be a Democratic operative or even an O'Malley ally. Nitkin points out that minutes after The Washington Post broke the Steffen story on its Web site, "MD4BUSH gathered all exchanges from NCPAC [Steffen's username] and posted them in a convenient place on the Web site." This indicates prior knowledge of the content and timing of the Post story [NoSS].
Reporters call it "rumor patrol," and chasing leads in pursuit of what is fact and what is not can consume a significant amount of their time. The search is worth it, however, if their efforts bring facts to light or lay rumors to rest.
Thanks Todd ;)
Spill the beans Jim.... Who is MD4Bush?
competitive?? The networks don't compete, they have the same stories with the same spin. I fail to see how a one-newspaper town report could feel, 'competitive pressure'.
Teddy Kennedy under the influence
Bump for the road and check back in the morn'.
Paul Moore's column appears Sundays...
in the comics section, no doubt. This is hysterical.
Dan Rather and Mary Mapes' love child.
bump
Ted Kennedy under the influence is a threat, juat a minor threat, but not to anybody in Maryland, he no longer drives here in MD :-)
Jim, you shouldn't have snipped the next part:
Substantiated rumors, however, we're all about. And all it takes to substantiate a rumor is one Democrat's word. Unless it would attack a Democrat. In that case, we'll need sworn testimony, even though that's not enough, really, because everyone knows that people can lie under oath about sex and it's okay, everyone does it.
Okay, they didn't REALLY say that...but it was so easy to put into their mouths.
LOL, Dan and Mary do have a bone to pick with FR :-)
LOL
Maybe it's Maureen Dowd coming out of the closet.
Without the facts they can spin things to include the GOP in the blame.
Why hasn't MD4Bush been banned?? I can still look up the name and get all of their posts to come up.
Jim is holding all the cards :-)
But they don't want the facts and they haven't sent you a subpoena,have they?
So everyone can read his posts for themselves.
I sure do wish they'd force Jim to show his cards!
Who's Todd?
Geez, keep it down; I can hear you laughing from over here.
BTW, did you want to borrow this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.