Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Philippines Should Become The 51st State
www.useless-knowledge.com ^ | Jan. 31, 2005 | Alan Srout

Posted on 02/23/2005 12:50:32 AM PST by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: freepatriot32

this is one of the stupidest "51st state" ideas i've ever heard, reminds me of people who want to make new zealand an australian state (ugh).


21 posted on 02/23/2005 1:39:50 AM PST by music is math
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason

Thank you for your post, and your inadvertent but appreciated re-affirmation of my pride in the nation I was born and raised in.

Despite the efforts of the socialists/communists/new-world-orderists, we Canadian conservatives think that we ARE starting to turn the tide. Only our next two federal elections will tell, but there IS some progress being made.


22 posted on 02/23/2005 1:52:49 AM PST by Don W (The most inhospitable places for free inquiry today are the universities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

yeah I know all about the problems in the Philippines.My fiance is living in illigan city and im planning on going there this year to get married if I can come up with enough money. (I hope this year she is starting to get ticked off its been 5 years and I still havent managedto make it there yet. )But luckily thats pretty far north away from the hot spots.The only thing I would really haveto worry about up there is the branches of the pentegon kidnapping gang and the other main kidnapping for profit gang whos name escapes me at the moment.But I heard from reliable sources that i can grease the right palms and get a gun permit pretty much instantly.So I should be alright for the month or two that I will be up there.


23 posted on 02/23/2005 1:53:46 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/abu_sayyaf.html
The Abu Sayyaf, one of 29 terrorist organizations on the State Department's watchlist, is a militant Islamic group based primarily in the southern Philippine islands of Basilan, Sulu and Tawi-Tawi.
http://www.ict.org.il/inter_ter/orgdet.cfm?orgid=3


24 posted on 02/23/2005 2:01:26 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

No


25 posted on 02/23/2005 2:04:17 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Our problem is too many states, not too few.


26 posted on 02/23/2005 2:09:56 AM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32; sure_fine

No. For all the preceeding reasons.


27 posted on 02/23/2005 2:11:43 AM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

No.

I want western Canada, Greenland, Antarctica and Siberia.
That would be cool :-)


28 posted on 02/23/2005 2:17:26 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

The big drawback to this is that the Fillipinos do not want to be a state of our country. The chance to make that happen was before 1933 and they turned it down then and opted for independence. They are a proud nation and it is highly doubtful they would vote to become a state.


29 posted on 02/23/2005 2:37:18 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ruth A.
What about the Muslim/terrorist issues?

That was my first thought. The Philippines? Why would we want it? What a mess.

30 posted on 02/23/2005 2:39:47 AM PST by BlessedBeGod (George W. Bush -- The Terror of the Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32; 7.62 x 51mm

HELL NO!!.... got enough muslim problems as it is


31 posted on 02/23/2005 2:43:38 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Mabuhay! This is an interesting idea. I'm trying to figure out how it benefits the U.S., though.


32 posted on 02/23/2005 2:49:47 AM PST by gcraig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood
Our problem is too many states, not too few.

How about a trade? They can have (parts of) California.

San Francisco for Boracay. We'll keep Yosemite, and they can keep Manila.

33 posted on 02/23/2005 2:55:20 AM PST by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

<< ... the Philippines is ...located north of Malaysia, Australia and Indonesia in the Pacific Ocean ... >>

Indonesia and Malaysia last time I flew back and forth among them all several thousand times for a living were nowhere near the Pacific Ocean and were essentially West of the Philippines.

And last time I checked, also, [And this despite that it's easy to harbor serious doubts about the left coast, most of the East and Hawaii] every American State was [And likely, whaddyah reckon, as a prerequisite to Statehood?] ... um ... American.

And the Philippines was .... um .... foreign.


34 posted on 02/23/2005 3:11:33 AM PST by Brian Allen (I fly and can therefore be envious of no man -- Per Ardua ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

The best reason I know of to say no to statehood for the Philipines, leaving aside all issues of economics, ethnicity and religion, is simply distance. The Philipines are simply to far away.


35 posted on 02/23/2005 3:21:31 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

The Filipinos who want statehood only want it for what it will bring them. What they would bring the U.S. is a heap of trouble. Forget it, unless we can buy the territory without the Filipinos.


36 posted on 02/23/2005 4:10:31 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

I am in favor of it. I am in favor of any state or country joining the United States or leaving the United States by the will of their people. This would spread freedom and democracy across the globe, but would require a return to a true Republic. Somethign like:

http://www.neoperspectives.com/foundingoftheunitedstates.htm

It would require a return to a Republic because poorer states might join just for our Welfare benefits. This needs to be eliminated.


37 posted on 02/23/2005 4:15:27 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/tsunami_tyranny.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

140 new rats in congress and 6 more rat senators? No thanks.
Don't think so? As soon as this was close to happening the rats would be out there explaining how they could vote themselves a piece of the pie not by working but by voting straight rat. It would be Hawaii times 28!


38 posted on 02/23/2005 5:05:27 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (In dealing with liberals remember When you wrestle with a pig, you both get dirty and he loves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
For what! That place is a RAT hole. Who would want it. The people there may emulate us but they don't respect or like us. Remember the whole thing about our bases there. They couldn't wait to kick us out but then pined over the lose of all that U.S. money that would be leaving with our forces. And let's not forget that scavengers descended on those abandoned bases and stole everything that wasn't nailed to the floor. Let them wallow in poverty. They can prosper using their own resources just like everyone else. U.S. adoption would only mean 80 million more welfare cases and unappreciative mouths to feed. Thanks but no thanks. IMHO.
39 posted on 02/23/2005 5:12:00 AM PST by CONGHUNTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
If we're going to play Adopt-a-Nation, I would like the powers-that-be to consider Monaco.....no welfare to speak of, sunny, nice marinas, an operetta-like monarchy and a great income-producing casino.

I mean, why shop around for third and fourth world orphans when there's better to be had?

Leni

40 posted on 02/23/2005 5:18:45 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson