Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada 'shuns US missile system'
BBC News World Edition ^ | Wednesday, 23 February, 2005, 12:27 GMT | -

Posted on 02/23/2005 7:02:17 AM PST by Righty_McRight

Officials told Canadian media that Mr Martin would make a formal announcement later this week, when he returns from the Nato summit in Belgium.

He had previously backed participation in the system, designed to detect missiles fired at North America.

A majority of Canadians are opposed to the programme, opinion polls suggest.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airforce; canada; china; defense; freeride; icbm; iran; military; missile; missiledefense; northkorea; nuke; russia; starwars; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
I hate freeloaders! How exactly could a majority of canadians be oposed to a MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM. This reminds me of a story I heard about turkeys. When it rains they'll stare up at the sky until they drown.
1 posted on 02/23/2005 7:02:22 AM PST by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

Those evil Americans trying to protect Canadians from getting hit by nukes. It really just one step away from total occupation and Nazism.


2 posted on 02/23/2005 7:06:01 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

They are following the same argument that Libs made against SDI: it will spur an arms race. It is a specious argument, but that has never stopped liberals before. Also, refusal to defend oneself if a major part of appeasement.


3 posted on 02/23/2005 7:06:58 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Half a league, half a league rode the MSM into the valley of obscurity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Well the wind would blow the fallout south during the winter so I guess we have to defend them. Doom


4 posted on 02/23/2005 7:10:36 AM PST by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

They have become "Al Qanada".


5 posted on 02/23/2005 7:12:15 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

Fine! Let Canada take care of itself. Don't need them, never will!


6 posted on 02/23/2005 7:13:57 AM PST by Spottys Spurs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I wonder if there is a way for us to allow those headed for Canada to get through.


7 posted on 02/23/2005 7:17:31 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy

actually,

I kinda like the idea of the debris from the missles landing on Canada......


8 posted on 02/23/2005 7:25:16 AM PST by Bigs from the North (Michigan: a state surrounded by water; a sea of red with islands of blue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bigs from the North

I like that also. I have a friend of mine in the Army who has been in Alaska for several years now guarding an anti-missle site.


9 posted on 02/23/2005 7:32:36 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

They think that if we're nuked they won't get hit. Oh how wrong they are...


10 posted on 02/23/2005 7:32:36 AM PST by BladeLWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
How exactly could a majority of canadians be oposed to a MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM.

It's called misinformation. We are inundated up here with misinformation, courtesy of the leftist propaganda machine, and few finding out the facts for themselves.
11 posted on 02/23/2005 7:49:49 AM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

My friends back home in Canada almost univerally believe that the missile defense system is both unnecessary and nonfunctioning. Non functioning because they have been told that the technology does not work and the few tests that have worked were stage in such a way to give a positive demonstration. They also believe that it is unneccessary because Canada has no enemies to throw nukes her way and that if the U.S. develops a less agressive and more cooperative foreign policy, hostile nations will be less inclined to pick a fight and if they did, the U.S. could obliterate them. My Canadian friends have been p#ssified by PC.


12 posted on 02/23/2005 7:53:31 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

From what I've heard, the problem is that the radar stations in Canada need to be upgraded for the system protecting the U.S. to work. Without Canada's permission, that won't happen and the system will have a big hole from most northerly missile approaches.


13 posted on 02/23/2005 7:55:43 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
A majority of Canadians are opposed to the programme, opinion polls suggest.

Right, and we know that opinion polls administered by the CBC or Globe and Mail are bound to be fair and accurate. /sarcasm

Martin is a political coward who runs screaming from even the slightest shadow of a problem.

Regards, Ivan

14 posted on 02/23/2005 7:57:51 AM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Sure. Deployment will start an arms race and China will spend itself into the dust bin of history like the Soviet Union did.
HA HA.
Those who say "it can't work", are very poor scientists.


15 posted on 02/23/2005 8:09:40 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

"I find it really very difficult to fathom"
16 posted on 02/23/2005 8:21:53 AM PST by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

I will be delighted when the next election comes in Canada and we won't have to put up with this rubbish from Martin any longer. It is likely that the Conservatives will win, thank God.

Regards, Ivan


17 posted on 02/23/2005 8:23:33 AM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
It is likely that the Conservatives will win,

Cautious optimism at its finest. I find it hard to believe however.

18 posted on 02/23/2005 8:31:18 AM PST by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gumption

This was something I saw in Britain and I see now in Canada - there is a point when a party has been in power too long and the patience of the public just snaps. It happened in 1997 when Britain threw out the Tories. The Canadian Liberals are drowning in far more sleaze and incompetence than the British Tories - my reading of the situation suggests that the public's patience has snapped and they'll throw the blighters out.

Regards, Ivan


19 posted on 02/23/2005 8:35:31 AM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

Mr. Dithers says "No!", and he means it!

Until he slides off into a subtly opposite stance.

He is one pathetic human being.


20 posted on 02/23/2005 8:36:03 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson