>He appears to be in violation of the cohabitation and sodomy laws, although after the Supreme Court decision in Lawrence, those laws are almost certainly unconstitutional.<
Couldn't his cohabitation be considered a conflict of interest, as far as his suitability to make life and death decisions over his legal wife?
Any reasonable woman, married to a man in such an adulterous relationship, would not trust him with her life.
Sure, and that's one of the current avenues of appeal Terri's parents are pursuing. It's a WAY better argument than the religious liberty one which is practically exhausted.