Skip to comments.
THE BEST PICTURE: WHY NO CHRISTIANS NEED APPLY
CATHOLIC EXCHANGE ^
| 2/25/05
| JAMES BEMIS
Posted on 02/25/2005 11:22:14 AM PST by jbemis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: kellynla
Today's Hollyweird crowd hates Catholicism... Hollywood hates God!
To: jbemis
23
posted on
02/25/2005 12:01:11 PM PST
by
ColoCdn
(Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
To: FreedomSurge
If Hollywood nominated THE PASSION it would be seen as a slap to the Jewish community.Not nominating could be seen as a slap to the Christian community.
24
posted on
02/25/2005 12:02:12 PM PST
by
ladyjane
To: frogjerk
You'd be surprised at the number of clowns in LA wearing a cross around their neck and they wouldn't know where the nearest church was if you gave them a map! LOL
And the same goes for the Jews with the star of David... Most of the young Jews in the "industry" haven't seen the inside of a synagogue since their bar mitzvah! LOL
Yep, it's all just accessories to these morons...
25
posted on
02/25/2005 12:02:39 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: jbemis
The author needs to understand that since the Passion is not in English it doesn't qualify for best picture. Since it is not in any language currently spoken on the planet, it doesn't qualify as a foreign film.
Why does everyone have to go into spasms when their favorite film isn't nominated. Big whoo. Most of the Best Pictures of the past 20 years really sucked.
26
posted on
02/25/2005 12:05:27 PM PST
by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(I don't support gay male prostitutes, beating up people in strip bars or poor grammar.)
To: jbemis
The Passion was one of the best movies I have ever seen.
To fail to acknowlege that brings shame to the awards themselves.
27
posted on
02/25/2005 12:05:53 PM PST
by
Mr. K
(this space for rent)
To: ex-snook
"Well OK if all you saw was just 'a guy'."
Yep. Just an actor, like I see jsut about every movie. Sorry - I just wasn't blown away by watching Jesus get beaten and killed.
28
posted on
02/25/2005 12:19:20 PM PST
by
Blzbba
(Don't hate the player - hate the game!)
To: Mr. K
Let's face it, the people who select the winners don't get the Passion much less the movie which depicts it.
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Since it is not in any language currently spoken on the planet, it doesn't qualify as a foreign film. Aramaic survives as a spoken language in small communities in Syria, Iraq, Turkey and Iran. Aramaic Language. Do not know how dissimiliar it is to Biblical Aramaic (the Aramaic used in the film?).
Vatican City uses Latin to some degree, no? But I wasn't sure if the film used a Classical Latin pronunciation or not--it sounded different, but didn't necessarily sound like Church Latin either.
My guess is the film is predominantly "Aramaic", but it is in fact bilingual. For the academy to discriminate against a polylingual, mostly dead language film, is the height of intolerance.
To: nonsporting
For the academy to discriminate against a polylingual, mostly dead language film, is the height of intolerance. It didn't meet the criteria. It's not intolerant, it's the rules. Movies don't have to win Oscars to be popular movies, usually the Oscar movies are boring.
31
posted on
02/25/2005 2:14:23 PM PST
by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(I don't support gay male prostitutes, beating up people in strip bars or poor grammar.)
To: nonsporting
....'For the academy to discriminate against a polylingual, mostly dead language film, is the height of intolerance.'....
Why is this the height of intolerance? Polylingual, mostly dead language speakers, are probably one of the smallest groups on earth, and I haven't heard any of them complain.
32
posted on
02/25/2005 2:15:58 PM PST
by
stuartcr
To: Darkwolf377
I disagree.
Now days Hollywood rarely makes a great movie unless it is by mistake.
People must be really bored with life to shell out $8 to $12 dollars on wasted film.
How many more stinkers like the Folkers or other tripe, will these unimaginative left wingers put out.
I see better Made For TV movies on Lifetime.
I got talked into putting in cable and taking the various movie channels.
That did not last long as I did not want my children using any of those Hollywood actors as role models.
Takes a fairly dumbed down person to like most of what Hollywood puts out.
33
posted on
02/25/2005 2:21:18 PM PST
by
OKIEDOC
(LL THE)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
It didn't meet the criteria. It's not intolerant, it's the rules. Movies don't have to win Oscars to be popular movies, usually the Oscar movies are boring. Wasn't my sarcasm obvious?
To: stuartcr
Why is this the height of intolerance? Polylingual, mostly dead language speakers, are probably one of the smallest groups on earth, and I haven't heard any of them complain. Someone must represent "them." They probably don't have TV, and definitely don't have access to the internet.
To: nonsporting
How would we know if they are offended and feel the need for representation? Maybe they like their anonymity..
36
posted on
02/25/2005 2:34:28 PM PST
by
stuartcr
To: jbemis
FINDING NEVERLAND, a story about Peter Pan creator J. M. Barrie, is a thin but rewarding film, featuring an excellent performance by Johnny Depp the first role Ive seen in which he doesnt grossly overact. Another highlight is the extraordinary performance by Freddie Highmore as a member of the family that inspires Barrie to write Peter Pan. NEVERLAND is an enjoyable and touching movie, but ultimately is rather insubstantial.I would never categorize Johnny Depp as an overactor. He just isn't. His portrayal of the Jack Sparrow in PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN was meant to be over the top and he was brilliant. Finding Neverland was a beautiful movie and I recommend it to everyone.
37
posted on
02/25/2005 2:37:23 PM PST
by
Hildy
To: OKIEDOC
"Takes a fairly dumbed down person to like most of what Hollywood puts out."
OK. What's this got to do with my post about Scorsese?
38
posted on
02/25/2005 3:09:31 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Condi Rice: Yeaaahhh, baybee! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350654/posts)
To: stuartcr
How would we know if they are offended and feel the need for representation? Maybe they like their anonymity.. We can ask them.
As to their anonymity: Some linguist(s) must have payed them recent visits, and identified their spoken language. They probably couldn't care less about the Acadamy. However, they might want know there is now a film made in their native language. They may have trouble with the Latin, and subtitles may need to be translated into Aramaic. I don't recall that menu option.
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Another point they need to consider: only the top 5 vote getters in the preliminary voting qualify for the final ballot. For all we know, "Passion" could have made the top 10 in the preliminary voting.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson