Yes. Barr went on the ACLU payroll as a means to influence congressional legislation on privacy issues. By doing so, he adopted the ACLU's position on a right to privacy that only exists from emanating constitutional penumbras created by liberal Supreme Court Justices to justify their decisions that defy the plain intent of the U.S. Constitution.
Or is this one of your pseudo-conservative drive-bys?
I'm sick and tired of people like you assuming that anyone you disagree with who joined Free Republic after you is automatically a liberal. 1. Barr did good work during Clinton's impeachment. 2. He sold out conservative judicial principles when he went on the ACLU payroll. If you want to defend his paid stance in support of nonexistent privacy rights that served as the basis for Roe v. Wade, feel free to do so. Calling me a pseudo-conservative while doing so suggests you're blindly defending Barr based on his congressional work without examining what he has been paid to do by the ACLU.
Assuming that I do the things that you accuse me of on FR makes an ass out of you.
I disagree with you because you're wrong, not because you joined after me. I notice that you refused to address Barr's membership in the ACU, which I believe you had to do, because it weakens your ACLU smear of Barr.
He sold out conservative judicial principles when he went on the ACLU payroll.
That's your opinion. Knowing how the game is played in the Town Of Political Prostitutes, I'll withhold judgement until I uncover further data on what Barr's longterm plan is.