Posted on 03/05/2005 7:02:36 AM PST by EllenMarie
I've just received a brochure from Congressman Steny Hoyer (D-MD) announcing Town Hall Meetings. This brochure includes the following quote:
"In response to the administration's plan to partially privatize Social Security, I have put together this guide to answer questions about what this privatization plan will mean to you and your retirement. I have serious reservations about this plan..."
Question: Under the Clinton administration, Social Security was taxed. Did Congressman Hoyer for or against this taxation?
While I can't cite you the actual vote to means test social security benefits...he's a Dem, so I'd say that's a pretty safe assumption..
Ah yes, Steny from Maryland, where taxpayers are about to fund a new, experimental species of sex education. Students will be instructed on the correct placement of condoms on cucumbers.
A majority of parents support using the seedless variety of cucumber, a minority prefer bananas, gourds were ruled out as too seasonal, although longer lasting.
Most Maryland residents support a higher level of taxation so that all students from ages 3 to 18 can participate. Teachers anticipate that a fully funded program will enable them to achieve optimal dexterity in this vital intellectual pursuit.
The initial tax on 50% of benefits, under certain circumstances, was passed during the Reagan presidency.
In 1993, during the Clinton presidency, the amount of benefits subject to taxation was raised to 85%. In neither case were the conditions that made benefits taxable indexed to inflation. Thus, every year, more and more people are finding their SS benefits taxed.
The 1993 action was on the OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT OF 1993.
NO REPUBLICAN IN THE HOUSE OR SENATE VOTED FOR IT.
The vote in the House was:
Roll Call 406 - 8/5/93 - 218 to 216 (AND YES, STENEY HOYER VOTED "AYE")
Vote No.247 - 86/6/93 - 50 to 50 - VP Al Gore broke the tie.
C-SPAN telecast one of Hoyer's town hall meetings and it was the most disgusting piece of crap that I've ever seen.
Remembering that nobody is recommending unlimited investment in individual stocks, etc., I found it especially galling when Hoyer answered a particular question.
A woman asked if private accounts would be "risky" and Hoyer shot back "Ever hear of a company called Enron".
I would have liked to slap his smarmy mouth for that one.
And the rest was no better.
Thanks. I knew the answer to the question. I just needed some specifics.
totally agree.
how did non contributing immigrants become able to partake?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.