To: NormsRevenge
let customers pick the channels they want rather than buy fixed-price packages
I agree with the concept. Two-thirds of the cable channels are subsidized junk anyway. If people got to choose their line-up, most of those would go under. I would much rather pay for 25 good watchable channels than have to weed through the 70 I get.
The concept would force people into digital. I'm not sure the concept could work with analog, but with digital, channel selections can easily be entered via computer. I would bet the more popular channels would be higher cost. I doubt FX or Spike or Lifetime or SciFI would be available for the same rate as Golf or House & Garden or Travel.
2 posted on
03/07/2005 3:45:25 PM PST by
TomGuy
(America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
To: TomGuy; antoninartaud
I agree with the concept. Two-thirds of the cable channels are subsidized junk anyway. If people got to choose their line-up, most of those would go under. I would much rather pay for 25 good watchable channels than have to weed through the 70 I get.
Could you two possibly be missing the point of the article?
14 posted on
03/07/2005 8:29:41 PM PST by
ClintonBeGone
(In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson