Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
let customers pick the channels they want rather than buy fixed-price packages

I agree with the concept. Two-thirds of the cable channels are subsidized junk anyway. If people got to choose their line-up, most of those would go under. I would much rather pay for 25 good watchable channels than have to weed through the 70 I get.

The concept would force people into digital. I'm not sure the concept could work with analog, but with digital, channel selections can easily be entered via computer. I would bet the more popular channels would be higher cost. I doubt FX or Spike or Lifetime or SciFI would be available for the same rate as Golf or House & Garden or Travel.
2 posted on 03/07/2005 3:45:25 PM PST by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy; antoninartaud
I agree with the concept. Two-thirds of the cable channels are subsidized junk anyway. If people got to choose their line-up, most of those would go under. I would much rather pay for 25 good watchable channels than have to weed through the 70 I get.

Could you two possibly be missing the point of the article?

14 posted on 03/07/2005 8:29:41 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson