Posted on 03/14/2005 9:55:00 AM PST by srm913
How about "The Cost of Peace in our Time"?
6 million Jews
20 million Russians
2 million Cambodians
200,000 Kurds
2 million Rwandans
The list goes on.
I remember how stupid i thought liberals were when their main complaint about Rush Limbaugh was "he's fat".
And now the tables are turned.
ROFLMAO!!!
Geez, how I miss Al Capp.
Geez, we are old. :-)
(takeoff on the moldy oldie, "what's black & white & "read" all over)
HAHAHA! Love it!
ROFL...!!! What a picture!
Shmoo, Shamoo, ahhh shoot !
Shamu is the correct spelling of the killer whale.
bump for laugh material.
Correct. Moore is a self-created Shmuck.
I thought the reference was to the Shmoo's tubbyness.
Where did this one come from?
Michael Moore does this because any mention of his name boosts his income (with the liberal losers being reminded of him yet again---to remind them to go out and buy his books and videos). The ulterior motive is profit. And it feeds his ego, too.
Why do you think Michael Jackson cooked up the whole "I hurt my back" bit in which he showed up for court in his PJs? If MJ really took the advice of his lawyers, he would have changed into more fitting attire. But instead he figures "people will feel sorry for me, being rushed back to court--no time to even change my clothes--after suffering a horrible backache". And people notice him more when he does oddball things...would it have grabbed as much notice if he had donned a suit upon returning to court? It feeds MJs ego...maybe he figures he'll sell some more albums...or at least "get his name in the papers".
Like it isn't already!
By the same token, Moore's "day of protest" calls attention to HIM. Every time it's mentioned on the news,
the fatso gets mentioned with it. More libs buying "Will They Trust Us Again?" or "F-911", etc. Ka-ching!
What's the joke I heard--what do Shamu the Killer Whale and Michael Jackson have in common? They're both black and white and live in an amusement park.
I wonder what Mikey is going to do when he realizes that the NYT just erased all his reasons to hate Bush, by admitting there WAS WMD IN IRAQ in 2003.
The 100,000 figure comes from some neurotic lefty org (can't remember name) that just took a poll of Iraqis asking if they knew anyone who had been killed. They did not bother with the obvious necessity of cross-checking to make sure that they weren't counting the same people over and over. If they bother with that, the figure is more like 15,000.
They did? This I GOTTA see -- can you give me an excerpt or link?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.