Posted on 03/14/2005 3:55:49 PM PST by snowsislander
In a scenario unimaginable 60 years ago at the end of World War II, the former enemies are pooling their efforts and resources for their collective national security
In the coming months, US and Japanese military officers and defense officials will be sitting down in Tokyo, the Pacific Command in Hawaii and Washington to determine ways to put muscle into the swiftly maturing alliance between the US and Japan.
If all goes well, those efforts will produce a joint declaration by US President George W. Bush and Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi next autumn that will reflect the most fundamental and far-reaching revision of the alliance since the US-Japan Security Treaty was rewritten in 1960.
The critical feature: The US and Japan will transform their security bond from one of senior partner-junior partner to one of more nearly equals in policy and strategy, even if the military power of the US still overshadows that of Japan.
Among the vital issues to be worked out, Japanese and US officials say, are:
One, roles and missions, in which Americans and Japanese will decide on a division of labor and which forces will be responsible for what missions, to make best use of those forces and to preclude duplication.
Two, expanded combined operations and training, especially between Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force and the US Army and US Marine Corps. The navies and air forces, which already coordinate many operations, would do more of the same.
Three, sharing intelligence as the Japanese, in particular, strengthen their ability to collect and analyze information and then to meld it with intelligence produced by US services.
Four, revised war plans, a touchy subject that officials are reluctant to discuss in public. A US official said, however: "We continually review our bilateral coordination mechanisms and processes."
Five, moving a US Army corps headquarters to Japan from the US to put it in the region where it would operate and into close proximity to Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force for combined planning, training and operations.
Six, researching and building a combined ballistic missile defense that would be aimed first at the missile threat from North Korea, which fired a missile over Japan in 1998, and then at the longer range threat from China.
All of this is part of US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's plan for a rigorous overhaul of the US military posture in Asia. It calls for dismantling the many-layered command structure in South Korea, consolidating control into a streamlined US headquarters in Japan, reducing US forces in South Korea and giving those that remain a regional rather than a local mission.
When US and Japanese officials began discussing the realignment of US forces in Japan, the US focused on the command element while the Japanese sought to reduce the friction of US bases next to Japanese neighborhoods. Before the negotiations went far, the two sides agreed that they needed basic reassessment of the alliance.
In Japan, Koizumi formed a commission on security led by a prominent business executive, Hiroshi Araki of Tokyo Electric Power. The commission recommended in October last year that Japan forge an "integrated security strategy" through "strategic consultations" with the US.
Then came two declarations in Tokyo and one in Washington that would have been unthinkable five years ago from a Japan that had wrapped itself in a pacifist cocoon after the devastating defeat of World War II.
In December, Koizumi's government published a new defense guideline and a plan to expand Japan's defenses over the next five years. The guideline said: "Japan's defense forces are the ultimate security of its national security."
The guideline further said Japan should "engage in strategic dialogue" with the US to include role-sharing, intelligence exchange, cooperative operations, exchanges of technology and "efforts to make the stationing of US forces in Japan smoother."
Last month, Japan's Foreign Minister Nobutaka Machimura, Defense Minister Yoshinori Ohno, US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice and Rumsfeld met in Washington to approve "common strategic objectives" that called for US and Japanese forces to "maintain the capability to address contingencies affecting the United States and Japan."
Machimura said that the strategic dialogue has three stages: The review of strategic objectives just concluded, an examination of Japanese and US missions and capabilities now started, and scrutiny of US bases in Japan.
Japan and the US have thus come a long way in sixty years. In April 1945, US and Japanese troops were locked in the bloody battle of Okinawa in which 250,000 people, including 150,000 Okinawan civilians, perished. Today, Japanese and US military officers sit side by side poring over maps and tables to figure out how best to deter mutual adversaries in the future.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
ping
It's about time. I wish they would sit down with each other tomorrow not in the coming months. A lotta hell can break loose in the coming months.
US, Japan, Australia and India will become the "NATO" of the East. (S. Korea will join as well)
Note that France and China today are engaged in the largest joint naval exercise ever in a display of force off the coast of Taiwan.
hello china, can you hear us now?
Oh goody..we may get to finally nuke those backstabbing french surrender monkeys.
No big deal. France has a way of turning on it's allies.
LOL......Japan is closely riviling Britain and Austrailia as a greatest ally.......good to hear they are lifting some of their military restrictions.....
Good.
Japan can be a potent ally.
The restructuring of command lines is long overdue.
As proved in Afghanistan and Iraq, Rumsfeld is a master at the concept of "Economy of Force" and using force multipliers to achieve what many cannot wrap their minds around.
Japan as a regional power with appropriate alliances to Australia, Taiwan and Korea to counter China/North Korea and Russia is Brilliant.
Japan may consider that a large increase in their defense spending will boost their economy. They could become a military powerhouse greater than China very quickly.
The Japanese industry is still far more advanced than China. A military program could really propel their technology and high-end production, just as it has done in the US.
Japan would be excellent developing stealth submarines, ICBM's and perhaps cruise missiles.
Now that they have learned the value of freedom and democracy it is time they step to the forefront in its defense.
Liberty exists only by military strength. It is time to welcome japan to the front lines of liberty.
I forgot India and Pakistan
Combined with the others, it is Containment, combined with economic engagement with a very high tech edge
agree with all you said.....now I think they would have to amend their constitution to allow for a bigger military but they can probably sidestep that a bit with their defense force.....as allies along with S. Korea, we would really put the ChiComs at a disadvantage.....like you said, even though the Chinese are politically mature, they are baby steps economically..........
Japan has already been considering changing it's Constitution. It will happen.
I would like to see Japan move up to the $100 billion level per year, instead of the currently budgeted $50 billion. While their domestic arms industry is already going to get a boost for other reasons, I'd like to see Japan's domestic spending add a real spur.
no need to waste a nuke. just show up at Orly airport with a couple of troops of boy scouts and they're gonna give us all their cheese and champaign.
I agree.
If war breaks out it would be awesome to sinke some french ships. F**king backstabbers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.