Posted on 03/14/2005 7:15:38 PM PST by twas
WASHINGTON - The leaders of Canada, Mexico and the United States will discuss a plan to beef up continental security and speed up movement across their borders when they meet next week.
A report calls for the creation of a common economic and security community by the end of the decade. The document's proposals would try to create a secure perimeter around the continent, while making it easier for people and goods to move across the shared borders.
The proposals contained in the report are expected to be a part of the discussions when Prime Minister Paul Martin and Mexican President Vicente Fox meet with U.S. President George W. Bush at his ranch in Crawford, Texas.
The report was jointly sponsored by the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations.
Among its chief recommendations:
Unified visa and refugee regulations.
Joint inspection of container traffic at ports.
An integrated terror watch list.
Biometric border passes to allow freer movement at borders and customs sites.
Joint energy and natural resources strategies.
A strategy to stimulate Mexican economic development.
If the three leaders manage to agree in principle to some of the report's recommendations, further discussions would be required to hammer out the details.
Greater continental integration could be opposed in all three countries. A North American economic community could make some Canadians nervous about the country's sovereignty.
Mexicans could worry about a U.S. grab of natural resources.
Some Americans, on the other hand, could be concerned about their partners' commitment to continental security.
The task force that prepared the report was chaired by former deputy prime minister John Manley, former Mexican finance minister Pedro Aspe and former Massachusetts governor William Weld.
You've got that right!
I too, smell the stench of Bohemian Grove where politicians, businessmen, and foreign bigwigs meet and perform occult rituals to the granite owl of Molech while wearing black and red robes and God only knows what else they do.
Since the secretive, and I think conspiratorial, Council on Foreign Relations is holding the talks you can bet that its to further its aim of destroying the United States as a sovereign nation and forcing us into first a regional and ultimately a world government.
There's more than enough to go around.
We are so DOOMED!! Bush is one of
the BIGGEST globalists I've ever seen. I KNEW he was going to go for open borders when I saw that he was meeting with Martin and Fox.
You deserve a lot of credit for bumping it 57 times, almost half the total.
Confidentially, I am concerned that the others are not pulling their weight.
Happy2BMe only bumped it 16 times; JanetGreen only bumped 10 times. Several others of the usual crowd only bumped 5 times each.
If these individuals had been doing their share, this thread could easily have gone to 300 replies.
We won't even defend our own borders - why waste time discussing defending the continent?
isthisnickcool wrote:
CanaAmeXico?
Count me out.
______________________________________
'The United States of AmerXiCan'.
Does have a certain ring to it though..
=======================
I see you are somewhat of an accountant - a mathmetician perhaps - good with numbers maybe.
Add this one up:
Now we're screwed.
United States of the North America?
Late bump
Don't care much for sovreignity then do you? I don't think it would be "interesting" at all to merge with Mexico. Corruption, crime, drugs, disease is not what we want more of. The only people to benefit are the financial and political elites and they really don't give a crap about the rest of us.
"The sh*t is bubbling to the surface now, ladies and gentlemen...read carefully and understand what is going on."
In bygone times on this forum if you mentioned CFR you got buried under tinfoil-hat alerts. My how times have changed.
Proposed concept behind NAFTA in 1979 Reagan himself was a dreamer, capable of imagining a world without trade barriers. In announcing his presidential candidacy in Nov. 1979, he had proposed a North American accord in which commerce & people would move freely across the borders of Canada & Mexico. This idea, largely overlooked or dismissed as a campaign gimmick in the US, rankled nationalist sensibilities in the neighboring nations. But Reagan was serious in his proposal. Though he traveled only once outside the North American continent during his first 57 years, he was neither insular nor isolationist. California has windows to the world in Asia, and Reagan thought of the US as a Pacific power as well as an Atlantic one. He also had a Californians consciousness of Mexico and an actors appreciation of Canadians, who are well-represented in the film community. The dream of a North American accord would drive the successful pursuit of a US-Canadian free trade agreement and a future-oriented framework trade agreement with Mexico Source: [X-ref immigration] The Role of a Lifetime, p. 461 Jul 2, 1991
I pose this question to you then:
What will become of the Constitution of The United States of America once America merges into the new, bilateral nation you and other open-border lobbyists proponents are fighting for?
Where did I ever say it was to become a bi-lateral nation. I haven't.
JMO, I would rather follow the vision of Ronald Reagan, than Pat Buchanan.
==================
Please pass that sentiment as convincingly as possible to President George W. Bush. A revisit to his roots would do him good.
George W. Bush is following in Ronald Reagan's footsteps.
Oh, really.
Oh, really
He granted real amnesty to them in 1986. I'm not here to get in a shouting match with you, I will let Ronald Reagan's vision stand for itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.