Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers: Hands off blogs (FR mentioned)
CNET ^ | March 14, 2005 | Reuters

Posted on 03/14/2005 7:45:11 PM PST by mdittmar

Bloggers should enjoy traditional press freedoms and not face regulation as political groups, lawmakers and online journalists said Friday.

In separate letters, Democratic lawmakers and Internet commentators urged the Federal Election Commission to make sure that political Web sites that serve as focal points for political discussion, such as Wonkette.com and Freerepublic.com, don't have to comply with campaign-finance rules.

"Curtailing blogs and other online publications will dampen the impact of new voices in the political process and will do a disservice to the millions of voters who rely on the Web for original, insightful political commentary," said the Online Coalition, a group of bloggers and online activists.

Fourteen members of the House of Representatives said blogs foster a welcome diversity of viewpoints.

"This 'democratization' of the media is a welcome development in this era of media consolidation and a corresponding lack of diversity of views in traditional media outlets," said the group, which consists of thirteen Democrats and one Republican.

The FEC ruled in 2002 that Internet activities do not count as "coordinated political activity" and thus don't have to comply with laws that regulate money in politics.

But a U.S. judge struck down that ruling as too broad last year, and the FEC is scheduled to consider it later this month.

If the FEC determines that blogs are in fact political organizations, they could face fines if they work too closely with political campaigns by, for example, reprinting their press releases.

FEC spokesman Bob Biersack said the commission would try to craft its new rule as narrowly as possible.

"The Commission has tried very hard for a long time to be as limited in its regulation of Internet activity as it possibly could, so there's no reason to assume that that basic orientation doesn't continue," he said.


TOPICS: Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; campaignfinance; cfr; cfr2; commies; fec; firstamendment; freespeech; internet; mccain; weblogs; williamwallace; wonkette
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: mdittmar
1) The NAACP is far worse and it pays no taxes and/or fines.
2) The first Amendment guarantees this right for us.
3) The cannot stop us, we would just change the forum discussion to a label of chat rooms.
4) The backlash would destroy political careers and they know it, so it wont happen.
5) FR doesn't ask its members or nonmembers to give donations that would be transfered to either political party. The only donations I know of are related to FR's existence as a forum or to help sponsor those of us who wish to demonstrate which could be for or against either party depending on the topic at hand. On some occasions I have seen personal requests for donations too that have more to do with law than the politics that maybe involved.
6) FR hasn't been recognized as a official advocate group for either party or recognized as such with any 527 group to my knowledge. 7) FR covers many topics on what is happening in the world from sports to general support for out troops in service, the political topics are just a part of the whole website which means there isn't a complete political agenda related to the website to justify it as a 527.
41 posted on 03/15/2005 5:20:45 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288

As I stated, it was my opinion, not a fact. But if I hadn't found FR in the last few days of the campaign...I wouldn't have even voted (Note I live in a highly Dem. area). FR was the only place I found sufficient facts to back up my own observations.


42 posted on 03/15/2005 5:23:50 AM PST by EBH (Mom said, "Don't believe everything you read in the paper.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
I think it is time to challenge MSM in court to pull their rights. They are no longer the press.
43 posted on 03/15/2005 5:26:15 AM PST by bmwcyle (Washington DC RINO Hunting Guide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Most of the political campaign material that is posted on Free Republic is Left-wing material since that is the material that we attack and chew to bits. :-)

True, I find I'm much better informed on the activities of the left from reading FreeRepublic than the lefties I know who claim allegiance to NPR... still they've got all the bumperstickers. ;-)

44 posted on 03/15/2005 6:17:13 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Amazing. Liberals in favor of free speech. I am absolutely flabbergasted. Gobsmacked, even.


45 posted on 03/15/2005 6:24:48 AM PST by Lazamataz (Cleverly Arranging 1's And 0's Since 11110111011...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66; mdittmar
This wouldn't affect FR, since it's not a blog.....

Maybe not your definition of a blog....but it can easily be defined as such.

* There's a time-stamp on each post. That's a log.

* It's on the web. It's a web-log.

It's a blog with thousands of posters instead of the two or three of iraqthemodel.com.

Don't try to hide behind a definition for protection from a law-grab. There's a section in each law called "definition" and they can write whatever they want in there.

FR is a blog.

46 posted on 03/15/2005 6:32:29 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name
FR is a blog.
47 posted on 03/15/2005 6:35:03 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

You have to watch this left-handed 'no law' laws.

They recently passed a 'no tax' law for interent... except voice over IP.

This was in fact NOT a 'no tax' law, but actually the FIRST TAX law for internet. Next they exempt sales tax (exempt from the 'no tax' law, i mean)... then they exempt something else..

It is easier to pass a law sying 'no taxes' (when that is what everyone wants) and then start to slowly 'exempt' things from the law you just passed.

Remember- the INCOME TAX law (consitutional ammendment) was passed as a tax on 1/2 of 1% of all income over $1million. Back in 1917 (I think that is when it was) very few people made that much- but the door was then open, and look what we have now.


48 posted on 03/15/2005 6:59:34 AM PST by Mr. K (I plan put my "Run Hillary Run" bumper sticker on the front of my car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Correct - it is called free speech.


49 posted on 03/15/2005 7:42:48 AM PST by Libertina (Hey temporary Governor Christine Gregoire - don't get too comfortable in that mansion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Just the "progressives" making up rules to keep the obviously dying mainstream media hanging onto the sinking raft.


50 posted on 03/15/2005 7:44:56 AM PST by Libertina (Hey temporary Governor Christine Gregoire - don't get too comfortable in that mansion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

There is a reason why we have the right to bear arms you know.


51 posted on 03/15/2005 11:11:57 PM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson