Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLay Pledges Contempt Charge for Terri Judge
NewsMax ^ | 3/18/05 | Limbacher

Posted on 03/18/2005 4:32:07 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay pledged Friday to hold Florida state judge George Greer in contempt of Congress for ignoring a congressional subpoena for Terri Schiavo's testimony, saying, "No little judge sitting in a state district court in Florida is going to usurp the authority of Congress."

"The Congress will pursue this, if we have to hold him in contempt of Congress," DeLay told radio host Sean Hannity.

Pressed on whether he intended to hold Judge Greer in contempt, the top Republican told Hannity: "Absolutely, absolutely."

"We will do everything to enforce the power and authority of the Congress and no little judge sitting in a state district court in Florida is going to usurp the authority of Congress," he added.

Earlier in the day Judge Greer rebuffed the Schiavo subpoena, telling attorneys in the case, "I have had no cogent reason why the [congressional] committee should intervene." He claimed that the last-minute action on the part of Congress does not nullify years of legal proceedings.

But DeLay told Hannity, "This judge and the Supreme Court of Florida are well known to be liberal judges that have a different worldview and they're imposing their worldview on the law."

The top House leader said that "no sane person" could look at Schiavo and say she's in a persistent vegetative state.

DeLay called a lawyer for Michael Schiavo, who has pressed for years to have his wife starved to death, "the personification of evil."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chooselife; contempt; cultureofdeath; delay; eugenics; impeachgreer; judge; judgegreer; parentsrights; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo; terrischindler; tomdelay; weloveyouterri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 1,081-1,093 next last
To: sinkspur
Should we just ignore the judiciary?

We should ignore amoral cretins that would prefer to starve people to death inorder to obey the letter of the law, and that is for certain. Or else we are no better than Beria and Himmler.

781 posted on 03/18/2005 8:15:52 PM PST by JFK_Lib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
Right, I'll call someone competent.

You wouldn't know competent if it crawled up your ass and ripped your tonsils out.

782 posted on 03/18/2005 8:15:59 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: beandog
So you see you know nothing. In fact, I wouldn't do it if somebody asked me to. I also find that selfish.

I think it is incredibly selfish to hold someone who wants to go for your own twisted self-righteousness. I did what my father asked of me. A dutiful son does.

So9

783 posted on 03/18/2005 8:16:15 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Should the other two branches, when in agreement about a constitutional issue, simply bow down before it?

This is what they have done for decades and as a result they have been led by the nose down lunacy lane.


784 posted on 03/18/2005 8:16:31 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: danmar
We know who Republicans are by their comments. That's why they don't need to make that claim.

You, my friend, are a TROLL.

785 posted on 03/18/2005 8:16:42 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
who did absolutely nothing to save herself when she could have

Such as planning a divorce but only a little too late?

Close only counts in horseshoes and handgrenades.

So9

786 posted on 03/18/2005 8:17:30 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 728 | View Replies]

Comment #787 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog Gone
However, DeLay is smoking crack if he thinks Greer can be held in contempt. There's a major separation of powers issue, not to mention that the judicial branch would the one who would be asked to adjudicate the issue.

It's certainly not an easy thing, but is it impossible, or should it be? Can a judge defy Congress on everything? Does separation of powers only apply in the judiciary's favor? BTW, the Constitution doesn't give the branchs equal powers, ultimately Congress has the big stick, if they choose it.

788 posted on 03/18/2005 8:17:36 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: eccentric
Here is what is bothering me.

This whole case is fraught with misinformation and confusion. The public is all involved, judges, now congress.

To me the central question is that if she did not have her wishes known {I have my doubts that living wills anticipate any and all of the circumstances anyway}, but if she did not, we assume that a spouse is the person who could be a stand in. I trust absolutely my husband to do that. But I trust the husband I am living with now.

So is Michael the husband that she might have trusted, is he the same husband that would logically make these kinds of decisions. All the evidence is that he is not. So his status as the guardian is very iffy in my mind.

If my husband were living another life, with another woman, I would not trust him to make decisions in my interest. That bothers me a lot, that he is the driving force, using the law and assumptions about his dedication to her best interests, assumptions that the law makes, that may be totally wrong. I also have great problems with withholding food and water. I would rather, if that is what is to be done, to have active euthanasia. But nobody can know, really, what this woman would want. And nobody being able to say that with certainty means to me, that the choice should be to preserve life, do therapy and hope for the best. She does not appear to be suffering.
789 posted on 03/18/2005 8:17:38 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies]

To: eccentric
I once posted years ago (on the old MSNBC bulletin boards) that liberalism=death. At the time, I was highly vilified for doing so, but now it appears that I have been vindicated. May God rescue Terri Schiavo.

The point is, if you want to help her, then you must act (God helps them who help themselves). Get it?

790 posted on 03/18/2005 8:17:41 PM PST by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies]

To: Postman

Postman, My husband and I thought the same thing. Anyone who harms a potential witness can be charged with interference and obstruction of justice. We think (non-lawyers, folks) that even if he refused the papers, that knowing they were being issued to cover Terri puts him in the 'contempt' category. Hope so, at any rate.


791 posted on 03/18/2005 8:18:10 PM PST by freecopper01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
The point is... prepared to get starved. A death clan.

You mean a non Roman Catholic non Fundamentalist clan?

So9

792 posted on 03/18/2005 8:19:11 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies]

To: danmar

The states can't get away with denying a federal constitutional right. Congress is jumping in at the right time, when it has become clear that Florida will do nothing.


793 posted on 03/18/2005 8:19:14 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
In the case of Moore, I argued that he should defy what I believe was an unconstitutional and illegal order, but that he should be prepared to accept the consequences of that act.

Greer ignored a congressional subpoena and he should also face the consequences. He is in contempt and should be removed from office.

794 posted on 03/18/2005 8:19:40 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: danmar

Delay is an upstanding Representative. I think he better tone down his power grabbing rhetoric a few notches before it comes back to bite him.


795 posted on 03/18/2005 8:19:41 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (You have a //cuckoo// God given right //Yeeeahrgh!!// to be an //Hello?// atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: harpo11

Most trolls do. I came to this thread to try to find some information.

Sinkspur and Servant's posts are a waste of my time.

I am so sad for Terri...and reading their cruel posts just disgusts me. Which I am quite sure pleases them to no end.

It's a shame.


796 posted on 03/18/2005 8:19:42 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 715 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

A no-respect-for-God-in-any-shape-or-form-clan? If that's what you mean, yes.


797 posted on 03/18/2005 8:19:49 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 792 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

So you think that a spouse should be allowed to starve the other to death if they are incapacitated and have difficulty speaking?


798 posted on 03/18/2005 8:20:51 PM PST by JFK_Lib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 789 | View Replies]

To: Shortstop7

That's why it's best to ignore them.


799 posted on 03/18/2005 8:21:11 PM PST by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 796 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
You wouldn't know competent if it crawled up your ass and ripped your tonsils out.

Why, I do believe that is personal invective.

What happened?
Run out of inteligent things to say?

So9

800 posted on 03/18/2005 8:21:17 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 782 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 1,081-1,093 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson