There's a big difference. It will be before a federal judge, who will review the case from the ground up. He or she won't be bound by Judge Greer's factual findings - - instead the federal judge will do a new factual inquiry. A federal court has never reviewed this case. only state appeal courts have - and they've had to defer to Greer's factual "findings" So it will be a whole new ballgame - like starting from the first inning all over again, when it gets into federal court. And the ruling in federal court can be appealed to the federal appeals court - - 11th district, I think it is, in Atlanta. so this gets it away from Greer and his incestuous band of small-time goodoleboys in Pinelles trailer-park county
While this is given a new pair of eyes will the feeding tube be immediately put back in? That is if the new judge agrees to review it? Or must he/she review it first before a decision about the feeding tube is made?