[Mrs.Nooseman]

Sir,with all due respect, I was not attacking you, nor was I disagreeing with you!

If you read my post carefully you would have seen that I was in agreement with you.

The rest of my rant has to do with you replying To a poster with stupid ,who was only agreeing with post # 3!

You didn't answer why you didn't respond to the original post!

I never attacked you on anything or called you any form of
names or referring to your comprehension and I would appreciate it if you would refrain from it as well.

[HoustonCurmudgeon]

You didn't answer why you didn't respond to the original post!

I read thousands of posts I do not respond to. Many times I read several that make no sense whatever ( I am amazed at the lack of political knowledge in this country and even, sad to say, on this board) and after awhile I just snap. Your friend was my snapping point.

I fail to see what the problem is with which poster I reply to, be it the first who makes the error or the second or third who agree with the error. I truly try to ignore errors as it often causes me to have to type repeated explanations to folks like you and your friend.

I shall at this point just give up and admit that the 14 Congressmen left in Washington on Saturday morning (ESTIMATE NO LINK AVAILABLE) should have gathered in the House so as to prevent me having to explain myself over and over. I assure you I will tear Tom DeLays rear up on Wed. the 30 when I next see him.